Dearman IS “Spiny Norman” Proven FACT!

When the Hampstead children’s disclosure videos first went viral on the internet, many turned to Youtube to listen to their young voices speaking about horrific abuse, depravities of man that children should never know about, horrified we listened.   A few short days later, February 20, 2015, the very first video claiming “It’s a Hoax” came out.  Uploaded by the Youtube account called “Sound Affects” at the time, but has changed it’s name many times since.  The channel is now, most recently been called “Spiny Norman”.  We know it’s the same channel that was created Oct. 30, 2014, after disclosure, yet before the videos went  viral in Feb. 2015, because the URL of the channel hasn’t changed.  It is still “PleiadianReborn


When the first “Hoaxtead: The Hampstead Hoax Exposed” video came out, the channel was called “Sound Affects”



Now let’s see, who IS “Sound Affects?”

Screen shot #1


Screen shot #2


Screen shot #3



Let me explain the importance of these Youtube comments and the video they appear on.  These comments were made by “Dexter S” and “Sound Affects” on the “Hoaxtead: The Hampstead Hoax Exposed” video made by “Sound Affects”,  the very first channel to make a video calling the Hampstead cover up a “HOAX”.


Link:  (Expand video section)


The relevance of the comments about “illegal videos of MY children to the internet” on the first video titled “Hoaxtead: The Hampstead Hoax Exposed”, so soon after the children’s disclosure videos went viral, is that most parents don’t have “illegal” videos of their children.  In fact, at the time of the making of this video, it was NOT illegal to post their disclosures, Mrs. Justice Anna Pauffley’s Approved Judgment of March 19, 2015, in a London, U.K., Family Court did that.  None the less, “Sound Affects”, the channel owner, called the Hampstead children “MY children”.  And here in this video, he calls his children liars…



“Sound Affects” has since been changed to it’s recent name “Spiny Norman”, yet the URL still says “/PleiadianReborn/about” (link archived here)



Here, in comments “Spiny Norman” says this video is the first use of the term “Hoaxtead” and this was the first “Anti-Hoax about the Hampstead case” video, where the comment, “posting illegal videos of MY CHILDREN to the internet” appeared.




While commenting on a recent video, I asked Spiny Norman about the “posting illegal videos of MY CHILDREN to the internet” comment directly…here’s how that went…





So the ILLEGAL videos “Spiny Norman” was speaking of, WERE in FACT videos of A & G and he called them “my children”  Proven fact, Spiny Norman IS DEARMAN.

Here’s the archived link to those comments


THEN on top of alllll of that, “Spiny Norman” PULLS alllll of his comments from the thread!  Bingo!


Full admission….and this completely changes the conversation…if not MUCH more!

The link to the video where these comments were found is

And again, archived at

This was Dearman’s response on Hoaxtead Research


Spiny speaks about his “hypothetical” children, what a LIAR!  Why did you pull your comments Dearman???? 


Recently, on Hoaxtead Research celebrating their publications two year anniversary, El Coyote writes, “Scarlet, who coined the word “Hoaxtead”, led off with a jaw-dropping 1,000+ posts in our first four months….”


So did “Scarlet Scoop” coin the phrase on 2 May, 2015?  or did “Sound Affects”/”Spiny Norman” coin the phrase on 20 Feb., 2015?  A mere difference of 2.5 months or was it the same person coining the phrase.  Is “Scarlet Scoop” also “Spiny Norman”?  Interesting points to question….



The “Spiny Norman” video says it  was produced by “AA Productions”, their channel logo:


And on Feb. 20th,  “Sound Affects” declares the case “DISMISSED” but it was NOT.


In fact, almost all of “Spiny Norman’s videos say “Case Closed”


And “Game Over”


Some new screen shots from “Google Hoaxtead” on Youtube, shows that ‘Google Hoaxtead” is “Spiny Norman” and “Liza Radley”.  There is also a comment that Maggs Shaw O’Neill joined the Hoaxtead ‘team’….interesting.


We especially liked these comments from the above screen capture:




Maggs Shaw O’Neill…..from the Hollie Greig Cover Up….Friends with ‘alleged’ Hollie abuser Sylvia Anne Major….is involved with “Hoaxtead Research”  BOOM!


The blog created to defend the alleged abusers, “Hoaxtead Research” on WordPress was created.  “Fact-finding to refute the ‘scurrilous’ allegations, support the Hampstead community and expose the hoaxers” (“hoaxers”, people like me who believe the children’s testimonies, police interviews and that the retractions were grossly coerced)  It is a place where the devil dwells…


And we here at #BelieveTheChildren have been on the case since February 2015, taking screen shots of our opposition and keeping up with all that happens for two years as well



 Here is an excellent video by “SuperEarther” featuring some of our screen shots!

 “Spiny Norman” IS Mr. Dearman, if he publishes anything, it is in CONTEMPT OF COURT and PREJUDICIAL to a FAIR TRIAL!  Screen capture all comments and posts made by “Spiny Norman” when you see them, the link.







“Pallas Athena” IS Nikki Wyrd PROOF


If you’ve ever caught yourself reading the dreadful blog Hoaxtead Research, then you may have noticed an account commenting called “Pallas Athena”




This blog, Hoaxtead Research is out to discredit, dox and intimidate anyone who speaks out for the Hampstead children or ritual child sexual abuse in general, along with “Pallas Athena’s” help.  Because, you know, the Hampstead case is supposedly a hoax, according to them.


When I published my post about Julian Vayne posting on Hoaxtead Research as “James Hind”/”Satanicviews” I received some comments from “PallasAthenaNike” disputing the fact that Julian was posting as “James Hind”/”Satanicviews and she most definitely WAS NOT NIKKI WYRD….



When someone comments on a WordPress blog, the administrator receives an email from WordPress for approval.  Along with the email comes information about the sender’s email address and IP address.


“Pallas Athena’s” email address was, so NATURALLY I looked it up on google…simple to do really…here are the results


PallasAthenaNike (Nikki) on DeviantArt


So PallasAthenaNike’s profile on Deviant Art shows that indeed it is Nikki.  There were no other profiles for PallasAthenaNike on Google.  This was the only one.  I double-checked on Spokeo just to make sure it’s the same email address that I was given by WordPress, it matched.


The first is Gravatar for WordPress profiles and the second for Deviant Art-MATCH!!!

WordPress also gave me the IP address….but I’ll keep that to myself, thank you very much.


So, now that it is established that Pallas Athena is Nikki Wyrd and that Nikki Wyrd LIED about being Pallas Athena, she is completely discredited.  She didn’t just lie once, this was perpetually talked about and brought up on Hoaxtead who still contend that Pallas Athena is NOT Nikki Wyrd.  If they are all able to lie about this small detail, what else are they lying about?  Pretty much EVERYTHING!  

Sooooo, who IS Nikki Wyrd?  Oh. My. Goodness.

In my post about Julian Vayne/James Hind/Satanicviews I showed that Mr. Vayne was a prominent member of the Illuminates of Thanateros 

So is his partner, Nikki Wyrd (pronounced Weird, born Nicola Ward)


So she’s a witch?  A satanic cult leader?  Why the hell is a satanic witch telling us that there is no satanic ritual abuse in Hampstead???  She lied about who she was and she’s lying about the Hampstead case as well.

She’s not just a satanic witch, oh no, that would be too easy….

Witch on DMT

DMT is an iconic substance; one of the central ingredients of the magical potion ayahuasca, fuel for the entrancing soliloquies of Terence McKenna and the beautiful art of Pablo Amaringo. This powerful psychedelic was also the one that the fabulous Nikki Wyrd was injected with at the winter solstice last year – for science!
A satanic witch on drugs…NICE!!!   And it’s not just for science, she promotes it everywhere she goes.  She’s a schedule 1 drug user and pusher-in-chief.
Now, don’t think that I’m some uptight church-lady christian….I think psychedelics have a place in the human experience, before having children I enjoyed mushrooms with my husband…put upon this planet for man and animal alike to enjoy…I see evidence of deer and squirrels eating them in the woods around my family’s home.  I don’t disagree that there is use for certain ailments that psychedelics can help alleviate.  And because I’ve taken mushrooms, I know my mind, I know it’s strength and I cannot judge anyone who chooses to ingest other mind-altering substances, so I do not.  HOWEVER, many, many times on Hoaxtead Research have admins and commentors judged those of us campaigning for the children who do drugs, so I find it extremely hypocritical of them all to engage in such judgmental bullshit to make themselves appear superior.  One example would be the way Rupert Quaintence was harassed about his pot smoking on video…

Lol, I love this video Nikki, every time I watch it I crack up….you’ll see why in a sec

<p><a href=”″>Nikki Wyrd – Psychedelics as a Tool for Directing Cognition to Enhance Embodied Awareness of the Kinship of All Life.</a> from <a href=””>Breaking Convention</a> on <a href=””>Vimeo</a&gt;.</p>
Nikki is involve in many activities described here
Nowadays she constructively criticizes other people’s work, as Editor of Psychedelic Press UK, Director of Breaking Convention, Director of The Psychedelic Museum, and freelance copy editor for a growing list of prestigious clients. She occasionally lectures on occult matters, and has facilitated a number of highly regarded residential retreats. She also runs The Universe Machine, a small publishing house specializing in thought-provoking books.
She and Julian wrote several books together, here’s
Co-Admins on the Blog of Baphomet
Nikki was once partners with Nathaniel Harris, who is also a self-professed occultist, ex-Illuminates of Thanateros member who campaigns against child sexual abuse in the occult scene, he has written blog posts, books and produced several videos about the rampant abuse of children in these cults.  We applaud his efforts, for which he is often harassed and slandered, by Nikki and Julian.  Nathaniel is a good human being, as far as I can tell, from our few conversations…occultist or christian, muslim or jew….we all have the freedom to worship who or what we want.   It is the paedophilia that Nathaniel and I are fighting against and for that both of us are severely slandered.  NO MORE.  IT ENDS HERE AND NOW.
Nathaniel Harris posted today on his website an excellent entry titled, 


He writes, 

“The majority of people, not wanting to think to deeply about matters such as the ritualized abuse of children, or how much money ‘cults’ might make out of selling sadistic porn films of (apparent?) ‘Satanic Ritual Abuse’ (i.e. sadistic paedophiles dressed in black robes and masks). Such films are worth even more money since S.R.A. is officially denied to exist by both UK and USA governments, who ‘coincidentally’ keep having to face allegations of people trafficking, child prostitution, and even of participating in the sadistic rituals themselves..”

….”I have attempted, over and over, to warn people, and have suffered greatly as a result.”

As have I attempted, over and over, to warn people.  Now we are beginning to see a clearer picture and the storm is brewing….your time is almost up.

No more lies, deceit or slander!  YOU are the deceivers….Now about that Hampstead case you call a hoax… 

Retraction Analysis of Child “Q




Retraction Analysis of Child “Q”

“We Believe The Hampstead Children – 17 Sept. 2014 Retraction Analysis”


Is this ‘retraction’ considered a ‘lawful’ retraction?  This is NOT what a true and ‘lawful’ retraction looks and sounds like.  This retraction should never have stopped a police investigation into the children’s’ initial allegations.   We believe the children were coerced into giving false testimony.

Transcripts are found HERE

For those outside the UK (videos blocked in UK), the audio was taken from The Hampstead Cover Up 

Retraction analysis Power Point presentation on Scribd

This is what the IPCC wrote about the retractions in their letter upholding Ella Gareeva’s complaints into how police investigated her children’s claims:

“Retraction Statements

Point 4 – Retraction statements were inadequate due to the level of detail in the initial complaints

Point 18 – Retraction statements were coerced from the victims and inconsistent. Concerns raised over the language used by the interviewing officer

Point 19 – The officer led child Q to retract the allegations regarding the murder of children

The IO (Investigating Officer Martin) states the children retracted their statements of their own volition whilst in foster care’
It is apparent, and not denied by the police officers involved, that the conversation took place between the children and the officer conducting the ABE interviews whilst in a car travelling to the venue where the children then made retraction in their interviews. This conversation was regarding retracting the allegations.
The interviewing officer states that he spoke with the girl but did not go into discussion with her brother. I have not been provided with any record of these conversations. I would have expected that a written note of such important discussions be made and would have been made available during the local investigation/appeal.
It is also noted that the children continued to make reference to the allegations after 17 September 2014 to their foster carer.
Having watched the interviews, I have concern in relation to the retraction statements. It is clear that the retraction was discussed by DC Martin and A in the car on the way to the interview. I have not seen any recorded notes of the conversation that took place.
Regarding the way G’s retraction interview was progressed is also of concern. DC Martin. in my opinion, appears to lead the retraction. He asks questions and when G gives an answer that is not the desired one, DC Martin pursues this until G agrees that it did not happen. It is my opinion that this is inappropriate. In my opinion the IO report does not accurately reflect the extent of this questioning.
In addition to that at the beginning of the interview DC Martin states, tell me if you are tired and we’ll stop.’ G replies, Well I’m tired DC Martin ‘Yes, if you’re tired we’ll stop,’ He then continues to discuss the ‘rules’ and continue with the interview completely ignoring G’s desire to stop.

From Child Protection Services (CPS): 

“Guidance for Charging Perverting the Course of Justice and Wasting Police Time in Cases involving Allegedly False Allegations of Rape and / or Domestic Abuse”- Link

  1. True allegations are sometimes retracted for a whole range of reasons which include:
    • a complainant may be subjected to pressure, fear of violence, or intimidation (which may itself constitute a criminal offence). This may be from the accused, his / her family, friends or the community;
    • a desire to give an existing relationship another chance;
    • the complainant’s fear that they will not be believed as a result of how they reacted / behaved after the incident;
    • the fact that the incident will be the complainant’s word against the word of the accused as there is no other evidence (for example, non-consensual intercourse will not always leave visible signs on the body or genitals);
    • a delay in reporting the incident to the police;
    • the impact upon children and / or finances (such as on benefits or tax allowances);
    • as a result of an agreement by the person originally accused to halt proceedings in the family courts;
    • embarrassment;
    • a fear of going to court, and / or having to relive the experience through the giving of evidence;
    • family / community pressure which may stem from the immediate and extended family, the wider community and from cultural traditions;
    • the complainant is involved in prostitution;
    • insecure immigration status;
    • the complainant has a history of or a current problem with substance misuse;
    • mental health issues / learning disabilities; or
    • to bring a prosecution to an end because a complainant believes or has been told that merely withdrawing their support would not necessarily do so.
Use of Retraction to Support Falsity of Original Complaint
  1. If the guidance above has been taken into account then a retraction claiming that the original allegation was not true may be used as part of the evidence to demonstrate the falsity of the original allegation. However, it would never be sufficient if it was the only evidence of falsity and a prosecution should never be based solely on evidence of a retraction. In such a case it would only take the suspect to withdraw the retraction and revert to the truth of the original allegation for the prosecution to be left in situation where it would be impossible to say which version of events is true. Therefore, there would always have to be some other evidence to prove falsity for there to be sufficient evidence for a prosecution.
Use of Retractions as Basis of Prosecution
  1. In law a false retraction of a true complaint could form the basis of a prosecution for a relevant offence. However, prosecutions on this basis are exceptionally rare indeed. The evidence would need special scrutiny. Even if a prosecutor believes that there is sufficient evidence to prove that it was the retraction rather than the original allegation which was false, then very careful consideration would have to be given about whether a prosecution would be in the public interest. Any decision to prosecute in such circumstances would be highly exceptional indeed. This is because, as a matter of logic, if the original allegation was or may have been true, then it follows that the suspect may have been a victim of rape or domestic abuse who should not be criminalised.


The two medical reports come from Aangirfan and can be read at these links:

Examination date 12/09/14  Reports dated 15/09/14  

Examination date 16/09/14  Report dated 22/09/14

Transcript of Child “Q” Retraction 17/9/14

“Q”: 8 year old boy (sometimes referred to as “G”)
“S”: Steve the policeman/interviewer
S: So, when er when we was in the car……… desperately wanted to tell me something but I asked
Q: Yeah
S: You to wait until we got here before we talked……….. So what is it you really wanted to tell me?
Q: Yeah
Q: Want to tell, Abraham he like accused me like er like when um he said does your Dad hurt you much…….
S: Yeah
Q: …..does he hurt you really bad? And I say, no he doesn’t and he said yes he does and he accuses me.
S: OK. And then what happens?
Q: And then he says yes your Dad does hit you really hard.
S: Yeah
Q: And he says no he doesn’t hit me hard. He hits me softly….just to remind me.
S: OK. So, what was it, we talked in two other interviews before, didn’t we
Q: Yeah
S: Was what you told me the truth?
Q: Yeah   (first confirmation)
S: So all that stuff about the babies
Q: Yeah   (second confirmation)
S: and the church
Q: Yeah    (third confirmation)
S: and all that..
Q: no, no the babies, the babies, he um no well there is some of the babies killed yep.     (fourth confirmation)
S: OK, are you sure?
Q: Yes. But not much, not every single day not every single day like killed, no not like that.    (fifth confirmation)
S: OK, coz I heard you watched a film Zorro, is that right?
Q: Yep
S: And there was someone killed…killed there, weren’t there. Because, coz of the way it sounded, it sounded to me similar to the way you told me about the babies and that’s why I was a bit…wondering are babies actually killed
Q: Yeah    (sixth confirmation)
S: or is it something you’ve been made to say?
Q: Yeah, it’s something I’ve been made to say.
S: So are babies being killed?
Q: No, not much but there is, yeah. But not much. (seventh confirmation)
S: By who?
Q: By my Dad. Not much.   (eighth confirmation)
S: Are you sure?
Q: Yes   (ninth confirmation)
S: It’s ok, if it hasn’t happened it’s ok as long as we talk about it now. OK?   (You ARE talking about it and the boy just told you nine times that what he said before was true)
Q: Yeah. So I lied about it no because he made me say it.
S: So I, so, there’s two things. So first of all you say you lied… So are…Let me just be clear. Are babies being killed or not.
Q: No (first denial)
P: So they’re not.
Q: No, he made me say it. (second denial)
S: Who’s he? Who made you say it.
Q: Abraham.
S: How did he make you say it?
Q: When I said,,,when I, when he asked me, Is any baby killed?’ I said no there isn’t and then he says yes there is he’s like accusing me of my Dad killing me, of me of him helping me killing babies
S: OK, what about all the secret rooms in these houses and places?
Q: No.  (first denial)
S: Are there any secret rooms?
Q: Ss..not much. Well there is, yeah not much not much no.   (first confirmation)
S: What do you mean…so have you ever been in a secret room in any of these places?
Q: Well it’s not kind of secret room…  (second confirmation)
S: Shall we start with the church. You told me there was a secret room
Q: Yeah there is those rooms. No there isn’t there isn’t because Abraham, like, he tried to make me say it.   (third confirmation & second denial)
S: Coz the way…coz I went to that church and I just wanted to understand where it was, coz you said it was in the the nursery, and then the toy room, and then you go into another door in the toy room.
Q: No (third denial)
S: Is there a door really in that toy room
Q: No. Because he tried to make me say it but I like say no no no. Not no there isn’t there isn’t there isn’t. But he tried to make me say it.
Q: You know, he accuses me. It’s not nice.
S: No, I bet it’s not. How does it make you feel when he accuses you?
Q: When he accuses me it makes me feel like…when he goes there he checks it’s not there. And then he will blame me.
S: OK, does that worry you or not.
Q: Yes it worries me.
S: OK and then you told me about lots of other things that happened about baby skulls and people dancing. Does that happen?
Q: No..
S: So…
Q: You know what happened?….
S: Go on…
Q: When he er he accused me of killing babies, he said what do you do with the skulls? What do you do with the bones? He like, he like really shouting it out…I couldn’t think of nothing, what they did with the bones what they did with the skulls….and I got nothing to think of and…and I had to like say…l had to like…straightaway I had to like say They were dancing with it, they were trying it on.
S: Oh ok. And what about…you told me about obviously the swimming pool, you told me lots of people in this disabled toilets and they done stuff with your willy
Q: Yeah yeah that, that’s true. That is true, yep.
S: It’s true? even though you said you was only 4 and you hadn’t been to that school.
Q: No, they had they had like..they were friends like teachers like I know I only was 4 years old but my sister was in the school when I was 4 years old.
S: OK.
S S So… what we’ll do, we’ll try and sort out what’s true and what’s not true. So the babies, it’s not true
Q: No.
S: No babies being killed, no baby skulls…secret rooms, are there any secret rooms?
Q: No.
S: What about with the wardrobes….
Q: No, no, look, no that’s not true
S: Cupboards
Q: No. Yeah. I. Abraham made me say that, He said “Where’s the secret room?” He said where the secret room?” My Dad is the main person doing the sex…so um he is the main personAbraham accused me of saying he got the most secret rooms..
S: So..has your..have you been to a house of your Dad’s with secret rooms?
Q: No..
S: So their’s no secret rooms…  (at his dad’s house)
Q: No..
S: And have you ever been to Mr Mullin’s house..?
Q: Hollings? No, it’s not Mullins it’s Hollings’
S: Have you ever been to Mr Hollings’ house? (a teacher)
Q: Yes. Um it’s um it’s um it’s um’s number five and it’s a …number f…no it’s number ten it’s from how’s it called Highgate Road
S: OK. We went to ten Highgate Road you remember and it was a block of flats wasn’t it remember?
Q: Yeah
S: Er, remember you won’t get into trouble, I promise you, as long as you just tell me the truth about..if we can just talk about the truth…then have you been to Mr Hollings’ house?
Q: No, because he’s my teacher…No, he’s not my teacher, he’s my sister’s teacher.
S: He’s your sister’s teacher. So you haven’t been to his house.
Q: No
S: OK. so why did you say you’d been to Mr Hollings’ house before?
Q: Well my Dad actually stays there. Um, because he…he doesn’t like staying alone. S: Ok.
Q: So he stays at Mr Hollings’s house.
S: OK….And, now after all this stuff with Abraham and you say he’s telling you and he keeps accusing you, can you remember what things are true and what things aren’t true Q: Yeah
S: You can?
Q: Yeah…whatever like worries me I want to remember.
S: OK, so we know there’s no baby skulls {Q shakes head} no babies being killed {Q looks up} your Dad hasn’t got any secret rooms {Q shakes head} you haven’t been to Mr Hollings’ house {Q shakes head}. OK.
Q: Well actually, um, my Dad actually is supposed to be living in um how’s it called Sheffield but he doesn’t have a…he doesn’t have a house in London he actually lives in Sheffield.
S: Oh he lives in Sheffield
Q: Yeah with his Mum, but I yeah you know when I was on Skype, I seen, I seen, um on Skype, I see he told me he was in Sheffield
S: Oh ok. So does your Dad live in Sheffield?
Q: Yeah but he stays in his other friend’s house that I don’t know and he stays at Mr. Hollings’ house and some days he goes off back to Sheffield.
S: Ok and do you know he stays at Mr Hollings’ house or do you guess that?
Q: Who? No, no no I don’t.
S: You don’t know, you guess or
Q: No I don’t guess because um because my Dad and Mr Hollings are really close friends, really close.
S: OK. And the, the stuff with the plastic willies, how did you find out about the plastic willies, who told you about plastic willies?
Q: No no that’s true.
S: That’s true?
Q: Yeah
S: OK. Coz I’ve been told something different.  (not an acceptable line of questioning)
Q: …….by (sister)?
S: Yeah……so honestly, just be truthful…if things aren’t..I promise you won’t get in trouble if you’ve lied before, I promise. (threats of ‘trouble’ if lied before) But we just, all it is I need to know the truth, what to look for and who to speak to. So if some of it is a lie, and you’ve lied about something I promise you won’t get into trouble. OK?
Q: So I lied about the plastic willies.
S: How did you find about plastic willies?
Q: None of it was real. None of it.
S: Why was you nervous about telling me that none of this was real.
Q: Because er Abraham already got you…he already got you of it…and he er you know the first time he ever found out me and my sister touching, it wasn’t actually true we are kissed us…we actually never touched, I know it’s against the law and we never touched, S: Never touched
Q: No we never touched each other.
S: OK. You’ve been to the doctor’s though haven’t you?
Q: Yes
S: And they said, there are, did they tell you what they found, the doctors, what did they say?
Q: Bruises
S: Bruises ok. And where were the bruises?
Q: On my bottom.
S: And how did you get them?
Q: I got no idea.
S: So has anyone ever put anything in your bottom?
Q: No
S: Nothing…and have you ever seen a plastic willy?
Q: No. I never ever seen one even in my life.
S: So how did you think of that idea, was it you that thought of it or..
Q: No, no er I’m the one who thought of it. When he found out I was touching he says he yes em they put real willies in my bottom Abraham says he said they put real willies in your bottom. And then I said no they don’t and then he said yes they do and I said no they don’t and then he said don’t argue yes they do. And then he says er then um then he says also a plastic willy don’t they and I said not they don’t then yes they do no they don’t yes they do no they don’t yes they do no they don’t yes the do no they don’t.
S: OK, so no one’s put any plastic or real willies in your bum. OK. I heard from one of the doctor’s one of your ears is hurt as well.  (How did the boy get bruises on his bottom???  The IO completely ignored the medical report)
Q: Yeah
S: How did that happen?
Q: It’s because he slapped me really hard.
S: Who slapped you?
Q: Abraham.
S: When did he do that?
Q: In Morocco, when er he slapped me he slapped me as hard as he could.
S: Why did he do that?
Q: Because he said yes you’re lying, he said I’m lying I’m lying I’m lying.
S: So what were you doing when he slapped you? Where were you. In Morocco?
Q: In the kitchen. My sister and my Mum seen me been slapped.
S: So you’re in the kitchen, and then what’s happened?
Q: Then see um…my Mum and Abraham, my Mum and (sister) seen me being slapped on the ear but that time my Mum wasn’t watching she was watching somewhere else..
S: OK, so your sister saw it but not your Mum.
Q: No.
S: Hold on, you said no have I got that wrong? Who saw it?
Q: (sister) only.
S: So (sister) only, why didn’t your Mum see it?
Q: Because she was she was doing the cleaning up.
S: So your Mum’s doing the cleaning up….When you said that you was lying, what did you say you was lying about?
Q: About the……secret rooms.
S: OK. So has your Dad ever done anything to you that you don’t like?
Q: No
S: So he doesn’t hit you and he’s never put anything in your bum.
Q: No. He’s really nice.
S: Is he?
Q: So the last week. This is actually the truth what happened.
S: Go on.
Q: The last week, the first time I remember the first time we went on…the first, I don’t remember the first one, I’m sure I remember it we um…The first time we went shopping, and buy some food for us and then we went to (inaudible) it was closed but…no I mean we ate and then he gave us ten pounds for our pocket money that’s how that was the first time he ever gave us pocket money
S: Who you Dad?
Q: Yeah, He gave us ten pounds
S: That’s a lot isn’t it
Q: Yeah, it’s really much..and then we went to (inaudible)-land and because we parked near (inaudible) and we ate in the car. Then we cleaned the car and then we went to (?)land and it was closed. Then it was it was nearly for us to go back to (inaudible) centre…and then the next time, yeah the next time we went swimming to East Finchley.
S: OK. So you’re saying the only reason you said this about your Dad was coz Abraham kept accusing you?
Q: (….looks up)
S: And you call Abraham something else as well don’t you, as well as Abraham you call him something else.
Q: We never call him…well yeah he says, when I call him Abraham he says don’t be rude call me Papa. Even he’s not my Dad! First, this is how it was. I first started calling him Abraham and he said don’t be rude call me Uncle Hemp
S: Yeah
Q: And then I kept calling him Uncle Hemp and then he like made me trouble he said don’t call me Uncle Hemp now call me Papa Hemp.
S: OK.
Q: And he’s not even our Dad.
S: No…OK. Do you like Abraham?
Q: I hate him. I got no idea why my Mum and Abraham…no, I know why my, Mum and my Dad broke up.
S: Why?
Q: My Mum told me this is why, because my Dad wanted to take us to a party but my Mum didn’t want us to because it was really late
S: Oh ok    (a party?  late at night?  What kind of party?  Why didn’t the Interviewing officer follow this line of questioning?)
Q: At night. But we were still like really energetic and I was like bouncing around and then our Dad wanted to take us to a like, it wasn’t asleep we wanted to have fun.
S: OK, alright.
(End of transcription)
(Text in parenthesis, italicized are my comments)
__________________(End of Child “Q” Retraction)

Analyzing the contrasting retractions of the brother & sister

Retraction concerning whether the children’s father knew Mr. H (teacher):


Retractions concerning whether the brother & sister touched each other:

Brother says: 

S: Why was you nervous about telling me that none of this was real.
Q: Because er Abraham already got you…he already got you of it…and he er you know the first time he ever found out me and my sister touching, it wasn’t actually true we are kissed us…we actually never touched, I know it’s against the law and we never touched,
S:Never touched
Q: No we never touched each other.
Sister says this in her retraction statement:
S: Ok, so this is- so that’s the man who looks like your Dad in the film who done that. OK. So you’re watching that film and you said Abraham’s come in and said “who’s been touching you”.
P: Yeah
S: So why do you think he said that?
P: I don’t know. He just came in, he didn’t just come in, he came with my Mum, and he said, I think he was planning to get me and “Q” in trouble I think, because he just said, “Who’s touching you, who had learned you to touch each other?”
S: And where you touching each other?
P: Yeah.
S: You were?
P: Yeah, but then after we just watched em my friend “S” from my school, she touches the- she touches me.
S: Who?  “S”?
P: Yeah, she’s my friend but not really.  She just bullies me and all kind of stuff
S: Oh ok.
P: And she touches my privates.
S: OK. So she’s a friend of yours?
P: She actually, yes, but she’s not my friend actually. But she learned me to do that, because- I don’t know where she got that from but she just done it to me.
S: Oh ok.  So “S” showed you how to do it?
P: Yeah yeah. And then after…
S: what did she show you how to do?
P: So so she touched me, and then she said touch me and then I said no that’s wrong. So then after she told me…she just took my hand and er touch and er just er like took my hand and like grabbed my hand and touched it with to her privates.
P: And after I said don’t do that “S” or you won’t be my friend. And she says she does not care and she said to me to do it to my brother and then she’ll give me a whole big packet of sweets.
S: And did she?
P: No she said I’ll give you a big whole big packet of sweets tomorrow if you touch your brother or ???? So then I touched Q and then after the next day when she said she’ll give me a pack of sweets she told me she said and then after I said where’s the pack of sweets they told you promised me and she said “I’m just joking, I’ll never give you a packet of sweets.
S: Oh ok. So that hap- so Abraham’s seen you touching your brother, and then what’s happened?
P: And then after when he said, “Who learned you to touch” and all that and then I said “S” learned me to touch “Q” but then he didn’t believe me so then he said No it was someone else. And then I just said er.. it was m- it was just “S” and my friends, who they they taught me to do that. And he said, “No, it’s your Dad”. So then I jus- I jus- said I jus- really have gone blank.
P: I just thought why would he say my Dad even though it’s not true?
S: OK, so did your Dad teach you?
P: No, only “S” and me and “E” (another school friend).
So the brother says they never touched each other while the sister says they did….

Retractions concerning “plastic willies”

Brother says:

S: OK. And the, the stuff with the plastic willies, how did you find out about the plastic willies, who told you about plastic willies?
Q: No no that’s true.
S: That’s true?
Q: Yeah
S: OK. Coz I’ve been told something different.  
Q: …….by (sister)?
S: Yeah……so honestly, just be truthful…if things aren’t..I promise you won’t get in trouble if you’ve lied before, I promise.  But we just, all it is I need to know the truth, what to look for and who to speak to. So if some of it is a lie, and you’ve lied about something I promise you won’t get into trouble. OK?
Q: So I lied about the plastic willies.
S: How did you find about plastic willies?
Q: None of it was real. None of it.
Sister says:

S: And you told me about, a lot about plastic willies.
P: That’s all not true because…
S: How did  you know about these?
P: Because “S”, she has an iPad Mini and she likes sexy stuff and all this and she showed me a picture of a plastic willy, sticking in a bum.
S: Oh right!
P: So I got the idea off that.
P: It was in Year 3
S: Oh in year 3
P: Because I’m in year 5 right now.
P: Because I remembered it from memory straightaway and I just said ….um um you know how they stick plastic willies in my bottom you know, Abraham…
S: So how did Q know about all that?
P: Because I told him. Coz that time, when because that time I told Q that day when “S” showed me her iPad mini that she showed me this kind of stuff. And he said “ooh that’s yuck that’s yucky”

These ‘retractions” clearly DO NOT CORRELATE while the children’s original allegations of sexual abuse DO.  Even when they were filmed separately, as well as their first two police interviews, their allegations of abuse were remarkably exact.  We will take a look at those in another post.

JUST 2 DAYS PRIOR to the children’s retractionsDr. Hodes wrote in her medical report dated Sept. 15, 2014 that both children continued with their allegations during their exams on Sept. 12, 2014:

“She (“P”, 9 year old girl) alleged that lubrication was used prior to the insertion of the penis or the plastic penis and identified and discussed the lubricant with her foster carer.  She told me that Vaseline was used as the lubricant.  She also told me about having had an injection.  She alleged that bleeding after the event had occurred and that then had pain on opening her bowels.

She told me that she has difficulty in getting to sleep and she has bad dreams including dreaming about her father killing her”

Dr. Hodes continues;

“In the absence of a history of constipation, medical illness and accidental trauma according to the GP notes, the anogenital finding of the scar and the RAD are consistent with her allegation of the application of a blunt penetrating force to her anus;sexual abuse.

She has described symptoms of post-traumatic stress.”

So how is it that the children continue to talk about their sexual abuse with their foster carer and Dr. Hodes up until the RETRACTIONS on Sept. 17, 2014?  How did the idea of ‘retracting’ their allegations come about?   How did Officer Martin get the children from their foster home on 17 September,  to a police station by car hours away?  Did the children tell their foster carer they wanted to retract their allegations?  When he picked them up, why did he speak to them in the car on the way without recording it? What was said?  And he had a room set up with cameras and staff ready for retractions to be given but it was not at his police station in Barnet….how was this all set up so quickly?  One day, the children are still repeating their allegations, the next day they recant???  These are the questions that drive us to continue our campaign to find the truth.

Thank you for reading and taking the time to comprehend the seriousness of this case.

I leave you with;                                                                                                                     “Assessing the Veracity in Children’s  Recantation of Sexual Abuse Disclosures”




Ella Gareeva’s Statement March 8th, 2017

Hampstead Cover Up to Pizzagate. Mother’s statement and appeal to the public.


It’s great to see Ella and have an update, thanks Ella!


I #BelieveTheChildren

Transcription of Ella’s statement~

Ella; “Hi, my name is Ella Gareeva, and I am the mother of two children from Hampstead, Alisa & Gabriel, who have been unlawfully removed from me 11/9/2014.
This is a high profile case, and you can find the details on our websites and  You will find the links on the bottom of this page.
The Hampstead case is a criminal case which has been blatantly and shamelessly covered up by the British authorities and we have more than enough documented evidence to prove it.
The judgement of notorious High Court Judge Anna Pauffley was fraudulent and in breech of several articles of human rights. She unlawfully assumed the duties of a criminal judge and jury within a secret family court in a case concerning sadistic, satanic ritual abuse of children and the trafficking, torture and serial killing of countless innocent infants. A case which was never a matter for the family court.
Pauffley, further abuse of power by criminally perverting the course of justice throughout the fact-finding or fact-hiding hearing. The crucial evidence, a two and a half hour recording made by the Special Constable, Jean-Clement Yahirou, was hidden away on the second day of the investigation. Pauffley acknowledged this fact of concealment yet failed to order a re-investigation. She dismissed and ridiculed the medical findings of a respected medical specialist in child sexual abuse with 26 years of experience that conclusively confirmed the childrens allegations.
My children, Alisa & Gabriel suffered horrendous sadistic physical, emotional, psychological and spiritual abuse in school at the hands of their father Ricky Dearman, head mistress, Kate Forsdyke, Louis Hollings, Nina Marden and the rest of the teachers at the Christchurch school. Social workers, parents and the members of the Metropolitan Police Service.
They were then further abused, damaged and traumatized by the authorities who removed them from the care of a loving mother and family. Alisa and Gabriel were essentially jailed and held incommunicado for all this time since September 2014. My entire family, my parents, my son, their brother, my sister, uncle and aunts all of whom children are very close to, have been denied contact without any court order in place.
Initially, my children were taken away from me on the pretext that I wasn’t capable to protect them from the abuse of school. However, once Gabriel & Alisa was snatched, they were forced to retract and the criminal acts were covered up.
The satanists who have my children, tattoo and pierce the genitalia of the “special” children. I would like to remind everyone that all the children from the so-called “special families”, all the teachers, and a lot of the parents have devil tattoos on their private parts. Many of them have irremovable distinguishing marks such as birthmarks as in the case of head mistress Kate Forsdyke with her port-wine stain all over her thighs and pudenda, Galyna Upson’s birthmarks and Nina Marden’s mole the size of a 5-pence piece.
All this evidence has been forwarded to the police including the children’s drawings of the distinguishing marks. To this day, none of the perpetrators, including the children’s biological father, Ricky Dearman, was arrested and investigated. Not a single mobile or laptop has been seized, apart from Jean-Clements laptop with the children’s testimonies. No CC-tv footage acquired and watched, no property searched.
On the contrary, Kate Forsdyke was invited to the strategy meeting on the 8th & 9th of September, 2014, literally a few days after the first children’s disclosures on the 5th of September, even though she was named as one of the main abusers and a cult ring-leader, way before the forced retractions. In spite of the well-documented cover up, the British authorities remain quiet. We still await the response from the Home Office and other government organizations.
Since May 2015, at the start of campaign to release Alisa & Gabriel, we learned that the key child protection organizations are unwilling, unable to take any actions, therefore are also complicit in crime and the cover up of that crime. For example, the NSPCC are not interested in investigating the horrendous abuse of my children, Alisa & Gabriel, neither are they concerned with securing the safety of other children who are still being sadistically gang-raped, tortured and traumatized. Amongst them, Sophie, Millie, Clark, James, Ella, Annie, Mia, Georgia, Amelia, Max, Calypso and many others. The majority of these children have tattoos and some, pierce rings like Cartney.
(This author has purposefully left out the family names of children mentioned in the video)
For the second time, the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) has ordered the police to re-investigate the case with no avail. All major media outlets were served with a Defense Advisory (DA) Notice. This is a notice sent out in questions of national security. According to the objective of such a notice is to prevent and advert public disclosure of information that would compromise UK military and intelligence operations and methods or put at risk the safety of those involved in such operations or lead to attacks that would damage the critical national infrastructure and/or endanger lives.
Is the Hampstead case associated with military and intelligence operations as in other high profile cases, the Jimmy Saville cover-up, the Franklin cover-up, the McMartin case, Finder’s…our research shows that it is. Which means ALL children in this country are in immediate and present danger.
I only had several contacts with Alisa and Gariel, between September and December 2014. Once my children asked to go home and we discussed writing the letter to the judge, all the contacts were immediately suspended. We don’t know if Alisa & Gabriel are still suffering the torture and abuse. They were kidnapped and held by the same people who subjected them to it. We don’t even know whether they are still alive.
According to the fraudulent, unlawful judgement of the above mentioned judge, all my parental right were removed. The local authority is under no obligation to notify me of my children’s health, education or well-being. I, myself, have had to leave the UK in order to protect my life and freedom. I was essentially framed for arrest and prevented from participation in any trial.
When a government agent, Sabine McNeill, published confidential court material on-line, behind my back and without my consent. On the 12th of February, 2015 ten policemen including two person’s with medical kits showed up at my door step threatening to force entry. Luckily I escaped.
We know that the father of the children, Ricky Dearman, accused of torture, cannibalism and serial murder was given double-time access to the children from the beginning and according to the order from August 2015 was considered to be the main guardian and was supposed to receive the full-custody of Alisa and Gabriel within six to twelve months from that order.
In the Hampstead case, we have witnessed the illegalities of police and local authority actions, ignorance of children’s rights, ignorance to risks of multiple children and the abomination of justice delivered by high court is now supported and endorsed by the BBC.
My children were damaged by authorities, unlawfully removed from my care by those authorities, further abused by those authorities who to this day, hope only to arrest and imprison myself for breaking family court secrecy rules where a thoroughly unlawful judgement which has judged me guilty of crimes I did not commit.
The cover up is blatant and is itself, yet, further evidence which most disturbingly gives insight into just how deeply the criminally insane sadists are embedded in every British authority and to the extent that they have full control of BBC news because surely, the BBC news team are not that stupid to miss all of the points now upheld by the IPCC.
We have come up with alternative ways to make general public aware of the injustice that has been done to the children, of the criminal activity taking place in the schools, in the courts, within the police service, social services, local authorities and the danger to all of the children of the UK . With various strategies in mind and the vast support of the public, we appeal to everyone concerned with such a horrific situation to start acting to put an end to these atrocities happening in our society and support our initiatives to free Alisa and Gabriel and all children held captive against their will.
I would like to take this opportunity to sincerely and whole-heartedly express my deepest gratitude to so many people around the world who are supporting our Alisa and Gabriel. Making and re-posting videos, creating and running websites and blogs, writing to the authorities, disseminating leaflets and spreading the story every way possible.
May God bless you all and keep our children free and safe.
Free The Hampstead 2
Free Alisa & Gabriel and all children from this evil.”
Here, I am going to add the letter from the Independent Police Complaints Commission upholding several of Ella’s complaints regarding how her case was handled.
Also, here is Ella’s statement translated into German if you have any friends in Germany, please share with them.
Please consider donating to Ella Gareeva’s legal aid fund to help her win her children back and thank you for your support by sharing.








The Many Faces Of Bridget Yorke

Who IS Bridget Yorke?  Why is she an important piece to the Hampstead puzzle?  What first alerted us to look into Bridget in the first place?  These are all questions to be answered in this post.  It will be long, the research has taken us more than a year of compiling information and finally it is time to come forth with what we know so far.

One alarm bell that rang the loudest was Bridget’s relationship to both Ella & Abraham.



Bridget is not commonly known around the Hampstead case supporters so I decided to do some “digging” or “tunneling” into who she was.  She has a Youtube channel that was once called “Biddy Baboon” but is now changed to “Bridget Yorke


Ella & Abraham comment on Bridget’s youtube channel but call her “Biddy”, indeed this is the same channel.  Notice the same channel cover photo as her Facebook cover photo.


Her WordPress site “The Eyes Of Bridget Yorke”


This blog has an “About Me” page


Other websites include her Tumblr blog for Inspirational Sleuthing, Surfing & Stalking


Her work on Pintrest is related to fashion, this link came from the above Gravatar profile, so we know it’s hers.


Her Instagram account


So now the question is, who IS Bridget Yorke?  Her Gravatar and WordPress profiles say, “I arrived in Paris as a South African model at 21 years old, in 1980, have been designing since 1984, am new at blogging, here goes…….”

Model Bridget Yorke at Maxim’s circa, 2007

Listen to those wonderfully intelligent answers in that video…whew!

Here’s Bridget Yorke at the “Bridget Yorke, I Love Paris” Party, 2007


Here she is with her bestie, Ellen Von Unwerth, (who I’m sure will not be happy about this post.) At the “Ellen Von Unwerth & Bridget Yorke Masked Birthday Party”, 2008       


Here, we see Bridget commenting on a photo avec son pere, circa 2009


La Haute Société extraordinaire!!!  That’s the Luciferic Haute Société, lol!   Here is Alice calling a smashing photo of Bridget, Maman.  Smashing!  Hoaxtead should have a field day with this…indeed, a yummy moment for me Char!  (Just wait for the next screen shot below this)


Now here’s the “THING” The High-Octane Screen Shot….Post by Alice, Bridget’s daughter, circa 2009


What’s that in your hands Niels?  Adrenaline you say?  Fresh from a WHAT?  A fresh Adrenal gland you say?  How the hell do you get adrenaline from a fresh adrenal gland? Is that from a tortured child, scared before being murdered?  And your friend there, you say he’s from Psych tv series?  So I suppose that would be James Roday in 2009.  I’m sure his handlers will be thrilled to see this.

Bridget’s partner who she had Alice with, is also a famous photographer, videographer with an interesting (strange) Youtube account.  Here’s what Kitsune has to say about their daughter

“You surely remember the marvellous Alice Auffray from the Maison Kitsuné x Yasmine Eslami shoot. Alice is a young Frenche (sic) model and young actress who was born in Paris, to a South African Ex Model turned clothes designer Mum, Bridget Yorke, and fashion photographer Dad Fred Aufray. Her Godmother is no one else than famed photographer Ellen von Unwerth, who started taking pictures of Alice from very early on.

Alice became very familiar with the camera thanks to her mother’s modelling years and her father’s profession and becoming a model was a very natural step for her.
She plans on becoming a stylist for fashion magazines, thats if she doesnt step into movies as she has a couple of interesting propositions already.”

Yes, well….all interesting stuff you say…

But what does this have to do with the Hampstead case?  

Well, it just so happens that Bridget likes to blog, she was blogging about fashion for a while which probably got boring, but also, something seems to have happened to her around 2009/2010, I’m not sure exactly what that “something” is/was but it had to do with “initiation” and failure of an initiation.  Let me start off with this video analysis of one of Hampstead cover-up’s main video creator and blog author, Jacqui Farmer from “Hampstead Research”.  She disguised her voice and accent specifically to avoid voice identification, she has a South African english accent.  “Hampstead Research” is no longer on line, however there are pieces of it HERE and the links work.   Many of the “Hampstead Research” videos can be found HERE.   I’ve written extensively about Jacqui Farmer/Charlotte Alton Ward HERE and my conclusion was that this is a person with skeletons stuffed in closets all over the place.  Here are a few screen shots to show you what I mean… This post is written by “Jacob Farmer”, one of the many fake profiles of Bridget/Jacqui/Charlotte


Then a few weeks later, on the TapBlog, she posts about leaving the case

My final statement – Jacqui Farmer

Dear Everybody

Happy New Year.

We have had a fascinating time. Our Facebook group was co-opted extremely cleverly. I won’t bore you with the details but boy, have I learned a few lessons. This was my final statement:

My final statement is this:

First, I want to express full support to Angie. David Shurter suggested she was disinfo. I do not believe this. I love Angie. Angie works with Jesus. She is a gorgeous person. If there is anyone in this group you can trust it is Angie. I have told David this.

I am going on to work with David Shurter and Fiona Barnett. I don’t agree with what David did in breaking the group’s confidentiality and I do not agree with everything he says but I like him very much and know that he is not disinfo.

Satanic Ritual and Mind Control programming survivor

Hampstead is a case for all sorts of people. Everyone is welcome (not that it’s for me to welcome people – I am just a blogger who has become an activist). I rarely talk about my experiences because if you knew what they were they would blow you away.

I have worked with some of the most highly evolved spiritual beings on this planet. Some of them are not human. They are not ETs. I do not work with them now but I have witnessed heavenly miracles and beauty that would blow your minds. I have been in celestial spaces that are so holy and beautiful that some people have given their lives to enter them…..yet never been admitted.

I do not know Fiona but she states that she is a Christian. I do not have any problems with Christians. The New Testament has truth in it. Angie is an example of a highly evolved Christian. So is Reina Michaelson. So is Fiona, I believe. There are many others.

David is a shaman. He was explaining to Fiona why shamanism is the OPPOSITE of Luciferianism. Christianity is not the opposite of Luciferianism – shamanism is.

True shamen are born. They experience a “shamanic initiation”. This is a very trying time involving dreams of dismemberment etc. After it they acquire shamanic power. These are the real shamen. This is true. I have met a few real and many fakes. David is real. I know this because I used to be on the board of the Spiritual Crisis Network and I have known people recovering from these initiations. This is VERY real. Shamanic initiations are not used by the Luciferians as far as I am aware.

What IS used by the Luciferians is negative initiation. This is the main purpose of their torturing people. As Fiona explains in her interview, they know how to open up the neural pathways using torture. Opening up these pathways in certain sequences gives people powers. There are different levels in the cult. Some Luciferians have powers like mind reading.

But there is also positive initiation. You earn those by being a good person – a truly good person to the depths of your soul. When your suffering is for the good (and I don’t mean torture, I mean humility, service and self sacrifice) you earn gifts. These are the beautiful esoteric secrets of the Universe. Jesus was an Initiate. I am not the only person who believes that the New Testament is a metaphor for initiation.

I know this because it has happened to me. Normally people are not permitted to talk about it. If you go to a spiritual teacher and ask them to discuss initiation they will turn you away – if they are any good. The reason I can talk about it is because I failed – I was a Initiate who failed an initiation. So I have given myself permission to talk about it. I was at a high level (nowhere near Jesus) but I failed. It was not just me – I take responsibility but the Luciferians got me. The dark wanted to snuff out the light. The story is too long to tell here but what I have directly experienced would, as I said, blow your minds.

At this point I have to say that this topic is so esoteric that I have had to include information that is, technically, incorrect in order for anyone to be able to understand it. I apologise for this: my motive is to spread awareness and not lie or boast. I want people to understand why the Luciferians torture and abuse (which is something a “positive” initiate would rather die than do).

I had powers that would astonish you. I was a beautiful person. I could see into people’s minds. (You only gain that one if you are so so very loving and non-judgemental you will not judge what you see.) If I wanted to I could connect into a heavenly group mind (I no longer can). I could heal people. People who were sick or depressed used to come to my flat and go away feeling better. I never had to use money because everything I needed came to me – I never had to pay a gas bill (not because I was spongeing off someone else or committing any crime but because the gas came to me free in the most magical way). I gave most of my money away to poor people. I am not remotely beautiful but people would come up to me in the street and say, “You know – you are so so beautiful”. I was one of the “radiant ones”. Unfortunately, the Luciferians found out and messed me up because they have occult/esoteric knowledge. But not before I healed one of them.

What you are reading now is deeply esoteric. You are reading about the secrets of the Universe…..

Leaving now…..blessings to you all. Expect me lol.

Jacqui Farmer

“Jacqui Farmer” WAS a Luciferian….and she’s running the main blog associated with the Hampstead cover-up.  Ella & Abraham were very aware of this and dis-associated themselves from her pretty early on.  They posted about “Dearman’s Witches, Bitches & Snitches” on their blog which I read the day it was posted.  Let’s just say I had a bit of a freak out about this…lol!  I wrote to them  via email wishing them good luck and saying I was leaving the case.


Ella and/or Abraham wrote back:


By June of 2015, “Jacqui” was writing to Hoaxtead Research, the blog denying the cover up, and indeed giving them all of my information and history from my Facebook profile.  She has put my life as well as that of my family’s lives in extreme danger.


This woman gave my personal information to my opposition, my children’s names and photos, my husband and his family.  She has put my children in harm’s way then has the balls to defame my character, my work and call ME a Luciferian.  HA!  That’s laughable, clearly she is projecting herself onto us.   Her team is not out to save the children as she, herself, states.  They are out to harm the reputations of other case supporters and above ALL of that, she destroys the mother, Ella Gareeva’s character as well.  This woman has single-handedly destroyed all credibility of anyone involved in this case.  Except for hers.  So what do they call that?   a disinfo agent?  a shill?  No, it’s beyond that….she worked at Tavistock, admittedly with Luciferians.  So perhaps she would be something along the lines of cointel-pro?!?!  Maybe.



As Abraham & Ella question in comments HERE,

“Why the prevalence of C.IA.,MI5, cointel, Bitches, Witches and snitches , pimps ponces and nonces , shills trolls and moles all over the Hampstead Cover Up. Why so much obfuscation, muddying of the waters ?
What could be so important ?”

Yes, indeed….WHICH side does she work for???  

By Sept. 2015 her Hampstead Research Twitter account was posting about “proof of Ella’s guilt”


Around the same time, Angel Powerless Disney came out with this video, where Angie tells Jake Clarke on the phone about some hackers who had hacked Ella’s & Ricky’s computers.  Shetold him how videos were found of Ella masturbating her son (aged 3 at the time of alleged video) to sleep and that Ella was involved, if not fully responsible, for her children’s abuse. Sounds like a bunch of BULLSHIT to me…especially since Ella’s computer and phone had been seized by police when they first reported the abuse.  The computer in question was in the hands of the Barnet police at said time of “Hacking”, lol….here’s the proof;  From Ella’s website, Hampstead Cover Up


So because I spoke out about this claim being BULLSHIT, I received this harassment on Jake Clarke’s wall from a sock account of “Jacqui Farmer”/”Jeanette Falcon”/Bridget Yorke, head of the “Ella was IN IT” team…#EllaGate



My response to this post;


What I (and many others) think is this…Bridget was a Luciferian initiate, failed an initiation and they harmed her.  This is her revenge.  Or she is STILL involved with Luciferians in Paris at war with the satanic cult in London.  Kerth Barker (46-page pdf at bottom) speaks about the war between the lower class (Satanists) and the upper class elitists (Luciferians).  This is a very plausible explanation.

My Facebook page, “Believe The Children” has a Note that I co-wrote with Sonya Van Gelder called “Panem & Circenses”, this is when we started speaking up about #EllaGate, the term given to this chapter of lunacy….There is so much more, but I’m going to end here and hope others have contributions.  Why is Bridget involved here?  Because she understands the “Cult” life and wanted her revenge.  Nice!

Oh, yes, here are a few of her LinkdIn profiles






I am not the only person who believes the Biddy Baboon/Bridget Yorke/Jacqui Farmer/Charlotte Alton Ward connections exist, our good friend “Truth 1” recently wrote a very detailed post entitled,

Investigating Hampstead Research Ops

Check it out!






Charlotte Ward-The Tavistock Shill

My blog came under attack recently by a profile called “GumpGump” on  I know, I laughed at the ridiculous name too, but while checking out the profile, I saw that it was our long, lost, creepily-jealous Jacqui Farmer/Charlotte Ward from that information-gathering “Hampstead Research” blog.


I found this post written by “GumpGump” calling my blog “Disinformation”


So where to start???  First of all Charlotte, I wasn’t “promoting my website”  I posted mostly links to other websites.  Second, I’ll quote you directly here, “Kris is somone who will hammer you if you do not use your real name.” I actually have never done that, that’s a lie.  You then go on to say “…but I never do because what I’m doing is fucking DANGEROUS”  You’re not the only one in danger, we all are while researching horrific, sadistic abusers.  Yet you drop MY name.  Putting me and my family in danger.  How is that even alright?  How can you say you care about children, yet hand me over for a SECOND TIME to extremely dangerous people?  You are not who you say you are, not for a second.  You don’t give a shit about children, you just want revenge on the “illuminati” that refused your sorry ass.  You’re a liar AND a coward.

You say I’ve never done “one second of decent investigation”  You’re not exactly the best person to critique,  during your short time with “Hampstead Research” you made millions of mistakes.  

I’ve never claimed to be a great investigator nor journalist.  This blog was only a place to put the screen shots I took, to organize and tell the researchers what I was finding, I’m not trying to do the same type of blog you had, oh, and where IS your blog?  Where’s all of your amazing research?  I don’t see it anywhere. I couldn’t “nick” any information from you or your website because by the time I really got this blog off the ground, yours was deleted.  

You coward, “Oh, I got death threats!”  Lol, that’s a daily occurrence around here, thanks to you giving Hoaxtead my information.  Big deal, that comes with the territory.


“Fear is the mind killer”-G&A

Nope, not friends with CAS, but I do get a lot of hits from her website, so I’ll not say anything.

I don’t have any ego about the research, I’m happy to say I think you’re a better researcher, but where IS your research…we could really use it, are you with-holding it from us?  Are you keeping it to yourself?  We all share research, I don’t own anything, I’m not going to be the one to solve this case, I’m happy to just be a part of it.  Because I can’t just sit here and do nothing about sadistic pedo rings…I’m here doing this, where are you and why are you attacking so VICIOUSLY the people around this case?  

You left this case, remember?  


Why are you still bothering us?  Go. Away. 

And I’m pretty sure David Shurter calls the Hampstead Cover-Up a “Psy-Op” as well as “#PizzaGate” as seen here….


He also says “Ella is in the cult” just like you, APD, Tracy Morris, Kristen Elizabeth and Malcolm Conrad Ogilvy also claim.  I’ll take these names down when you take my name off all the public places you’ve plastered, tarred and feathered me.  So if any of you are freaking out, just tell Charlotte to take a step back and stop harassing me.

Abe and Ella dis-associated themselves from this crew right here long ago, and they warned me about Charlotte.  Unfortunately, I had just made her co-admin of a secret group called “In Support Of Ella Gareeva & Her Children”.  So instead of kicking Charlotte out, like I should have, I left the group quietly and blocked her.  She says I set her up, I could have been much nastier but I wasn’t.  I had no ego about being the admin of that really great group of people,  Charlotte did.  Everything is about Charlotte, “Oh, I made a mistake again, I’m just working too fast…you can’t keep up?  Oh, I’ll slow down for you…” Fuck off.

She’s an initiate into something much too complicated to bother explaining to us peons here…


Lol, free gas just “came to her”!  Go, go away.  You’re a disinfo shill, an initiate and a traitor.  You’ve caused Ella more pain and anguish during her most difficult days.  She speaks about you here, after posting sensitive info she told you not to publish.  Just like Angela Power Disney uploaded videos to youtube that weren’t supposed to be made public.  You two alone wrecked so much havock in this case, it was fully on purpose.  Not to omit Kirsten Elizabeth on HRes Twitter, she claims that Ella was in the cult and she believed evidence of Ella’s “Guilt”.  Let me remind you’ve never produced any evidence other than hearsay, so what exactly are you doing?  You’re destroying a woman who lost her children to the cult?  And her defenders?  Back off, we are fighting a war YOU CANNOT WIN!  

You heartless, nasty women.  Shame on you.  

Shame on anyone that believes you are good people.  


As for Charlotte working for Tavistock, check!

From her own book, “Illuminati Party”



In the words of my very dear friend Sonya, who Charlotte so UN-eloquently tried to dish;

The case has been fraught with spies, agents, shills, trolls and the occasional psychopath. Continued intimidation, harassment, and bullying via our opposition as well as fellow activists is ongoing.
Infiltrating, opposing or discrediting movements serves a number of purposes in an information/credibility war. Besides gaining inside information, disinformation agents may deliberately leak information, create division, and steer the ‘group thinking’ and activity of support networks away from achieving real outcomes. Controlled opposition also satisfies the casual concerned observer that “someone is doing something”.
Such infiltration also serves to ‘media tarnish’ the reputation of the entire movement and therefore the public’s perception of the cause it stands for. This simple kind of manipulation is extremely effective, if we are blind to it. This is something that dedicated activists need to fully understand and remember in all our dealings, if we are ever to make a dent in breaking open cases such as this.

Here is more information on this fake Charlotte Ward/Jacqui Farmer/GumpGump/JustOut/Autumn Summers/Bella Bright/Anna Bella/Jeanette Falcon/Jacob Farmer/Biddy Baboon/Bridget Yorke/Just Human person in “The Many Faces Of Bridget Yorke”

Let me just end it here for now, I believe the children when they said:


I Believe The Children and not the adults that lie about or cover up the abuse.  I think we are seeing a world woke to the ugly truth that pedophile rings exist in massive numbers and the religion is just a cover to mask the reality, which is sado-masochistic pedophilia, adrenochrome addiction, production and sales of snuff videos, human trafficking, infanticide and much more.  

Rise, True Warriors, Rise…#LightTheDark


On The Legitimacy Of This Investigation

#PizzaGate, not #HampsteadCoverUp

This post was found on Reddit yesterday, it is now gone as the author deleted the account.  We felt it was worth re-posting;

“On The Legitimacy Of This Investigation”

(with an important message to fellow journalists I know are lurking on this sub)(self.pizzagate)

submitted 23 hours ago* by Throw-Away-Journo

Edit: this is a throw-away account, I will not be using it further nor answering any questions

Edit2: impossible to get such a piece passed my editor, so I’m leaving it here for people to distribute (send it to journos if you have the emails, it will silently resonate)

We are told the work on /r/Pizzagate (and other message boards) is illegitimate because people are rushing to conclusions, or because they are being paranoid, or partisan (despite so many of different political complexions provably working together). The subtitle here of course is that the State is solely legitimate to suspect and investigate crimes.

But what if the State itself is, in a systemic way, responsible for said crimes? It wouldn’t be a first; after all, democide (death by government, a word surprisingly absent from conversations) was the first cause of non-natural deaths in the 20th century. Whether one is from the right, left, or center, one cannot deny government is the number one abuser, enslaver and serial-killer in History. We may honestly disagree on the ways to eradicate the phenomenon, or we may regret that fact, but we cannot deny it.

So, if the State itself is committing crimes, it is the people’s sovereign and sacred duty to expose it. Those who understand this truth best tend to become journalists. At least, that’s what drove me to the profession.

Now specifically on this work. First, there is context; institutional child abuse is already a common-knowledgephenomenon. From the Presidio affair to Jimmy Saville and the BBC, or from the Vatican’s historic involvement in covering-up pedophilia to US legislators’ documented trips on the “Lolita Express”, from the questions still surrounding Dutroux to the Hampstead doubts, the scourge has been featured in the news, movies, documentaries, art work. There have also been many policymakers, prosecutors, investigators and victims denouncing the very phenomenon; see for example British MP John Mann passionate speech before Parliament on the subject last year, or the extensive report by former undercover Interpol agent (Bannon). Indeed it is a secret de Polichinelle. So the only possible disagreement can be on the scale and systemicity of the phenomenon.

To honestly decide whether that’s what we are seeing in the Podesta emails, please have a look at this one example. Look at the invitation at the end of the thread. Ms Luzzatto is inviting people (among which are John and Mary Podesta) to a farm in Lovettsville. This is what she says:

We plan to heat the pool, so a swim is a possibility. Bonnie will be Uber Service to transport Ruby, Emerson, and Maeve Luzzatto (11, 9, and almost 7) so you’ll have some further entertainment, and they will be in that pool for sure.

Impossible, you say? They couldn’t possibly be speaking about abusing the children! After all, what step-grandmother would offer three innocent children up for group abuse?

This is how invitee Drew Littman answers the invitation:

I’ve never had an affair, so I pass the Walter Jones test.

If you aren’t aware, Walter B. Jones has for 20 years been the U.S. Representative for North Carolina’s 3rd congressional district; in DC he’s regarded as the absurd caricature of a do-gooder, i.e. he is a noble man indeed.

Agreed, if that example was the only one, one could dismiss it as baroque misinterpretation. But there’s more, much more. Let’s not even get into the handkerchiefs and codewords – even though “cheese pizza” is a known euphemism for “child porn” (and there are abundant examples in the Podesta emails where that term is used in very strange and out-of-context manners).

How about the fact that John and Tony Podesta are old friends of Jeffery Epstein, Dennis Hastert and Clement Freud, three convicted child molesters? Who has so many child rapists as friends? Who stays friends with child rapists after they’re exposed and convicted?

How about the Katy Grannan photos plastered around the Podestas’ mansion, depicting naked teenagers?

How about Tony Podesta writing he’s “very good and a little wired” from being seated next to “the kids” on an airplane?

How about the underground vault on the Podestas’ property which admittedly allows them to watch “very complicated video pieces”?

If you are feeling ill-at-ease, that reaction is honorable. And the worse thing is you haven’t yet seen much. But for more, you’ll have to look for it. Indeed one might be breaking statutory laws by linking to some of the clues Internet sleuths have found in the past three weeks.

For example, did you know James Alefantis, listed 49th “most influential” person in DC by GQ, chef and White House regular, boyfriend of David Brock, owner of Comet Ping Pong, had an Instagram account filled with references to and depictions of child abuse and torture? Indeed it’s not just the frescoes in his restaurant or the “artists” he hosts there; it’s not even the fact his menu and the logos of three other iconic businesses next door feature FBI-recognizedpedophilia symbols. No, this is about his own posts, pictures, comments and friends on social media. Again, you’ll have to look it up for yourself. It is hardly ambiguous. Indeed it is Alefantis who puts the pizza in #Pizzagate.

If that surprises you, did you know Arun Rao was caught “liking” several of Alefantis’ creepiest toddler Instagram posts? Again, that could be dismissed – only there’s all this context, and the fact Mr Rao is a Assistant US attorney, and charged with prosecuting child pornography and abuse.

And if you’re still not distinguishing the pattern, did you know that Laura Silsby (Gayler), the woman caught trying tosmuggle thirty-three children out of Haiti (a country where the Clinton Foundation isn’twithoutcontroversy), whose release from jail became a personalmatterfor Ms Clinton, thereafter became an associate of MyStateUSA, which changed its name to AlertSense, and which is the one providing the technology to issue Amber Alerts?

Enough already. If anything I have proven the legitimacy of the following question:

Is there a systemic pedophilia problem in Washington DC, as we already suspect there is one in Hollywood?

In terms of national systemicity, the statistics are eloquent. The International Centre for Missing Children (ICMEC) estimates that 8 million children are reported missing each year around the world. Of that number, according to U.S. Department of Justice research, an estimated 800,000 children will go missing in the United States alone — a rate of over 2’000 missing children each day — with 466,949 of those cases entered into the FBI’s National Crime Information Center (NCIC) database in 2014. With a current child population (aged 0 – 17) of around 74 million in the United States, the U.S. Department of Justice figures equate to around 1 child in every 92 going missing in the United States each year.

This looks like a systemic problem indeed. Childhood disappearances outnumber cancer deaths in the United States by one third.

Therefore, given the sheer amount of leaked emails, and the suspected phenomenon’s scale and repartition, it is likely the data dumps (Podesta and other Wikileaks, Guccifer 1/2, DNCLeaks, etc.) provide some clue to the problem. Therefore, they should be investigated thoroughly under than particular lens, and suspicions need to be corroborated with other (and previously) known facts.

So, my fellow journalists, why aren’t you all looking into this? Is it easy for you to dismiss it as confirmation bias?

I’m not going to answer the question for you. At least hop on the bandwagon: this is coming out with or without your help. But remember some moments are defining, in one’s career, for one’s conscience.

I’ll conclude with two excerpts of the Munich Declaration of the Duties and Rights of Journalists (kind of our own Hippocratic Oath).

The responsibility of journalists vis-a-vis the public has precedence over any other responsibility, in particular towards their employers and the public power.

[A journalist’s duties include] respecting the truth no matter what consequences it may bring about to him, … defending the freedom of information, of commentaries and of criticism, [and] not suppressing essential information.

… and one question:

If this doesn’t matter, what does?








Further reading:

Suppressed Pedophilia Allegations Reveal Culture of Satanic Ritual Abuse

Evidence of Organized Pedophilia and Child-Trafficking Implicates Governments, Media, Churches and Charities

Persons of Interest 🔎 James Achilles Alefantis aka jimmycomet at Comet Ping Pong

TwitterGate and PizzaGate censorship on social media and beyond + Paul Wilson found guilty!

Huge Breakthrough in D.C. Pedophilia Ring

Another Reddit piece that needs reblogging:

As promised, Here is the offline backup of your subreddit. (v/pizzagate)

submitted 11 hours ago by erktheerk

Done uploading. I’ll host the backup for 24 hours. I encourage everyone to download copies. I’ve included a zip of the backup in the main folder.

I skipped all of the meta data scans I normally do and removed all my auxiliary scripts from the file, but kept the main script I use to gather the data from a sub. It will not work out the box as anyone who wants to use it needs to set up oauth2 on their own, I removed that section of the script as it is the oauth2 info for my main account.

There were also a few scans I couldn’t do such as overlapping subreddit users who also participate in since the sub was banned less than 5 minutes after I completed the main scan. I BARELY made it.

I need to work out a few kinks in part of the script to get a complete user list, but that info is available in the database. When it’s fixed it’s a complete list of every user who has ever interacted with the sub sorted by most active to least. Might be useful to mass PM users to tell them about the new site, but that also might piss Reddit off, so I will not be including it for public consumption. Don’t want to contribute to any witch hunts.

Here is the main folder:

Here is where the HTML versions are:

Example one of the files that is sorted by date:

The links to the comments on the list lead to the HTML folder and are threaded in the final order they were on the sub based on comment score:

Sorry about the crappy formatting. Something went wrong and I am running out of time to trouble shoot it. There is just a bunch of ”’ at the top of the page.

The RAW. DB file can he found in the database folder and if anyone knows their way around those types of files you can extract all the info I gathered.

If anyone has webdev skills and wants to contribute I’ve been wanting to clean up the formatting, add search function, multiple pages, and more of a Reddit looking design. I used some copy/paste JS to make the list sortable and some super basic CSS. But it works.

Any questions let me know. Thanks for all the praise and appreciation. I do this as a hobby and lucky enough I already had the tools ready to go in time go get the sub before it was gone.

I’m not a participate in your sub, but truly hope this help you guys.


More links, etc HERE



How “SatanicViews” & “James Hind” Become Julian Vayne of the IOT

We will show you how “Satanicviews” becomes Julian Vayne, leader of the “Illuminates of Thanateros”, or the IOT, with his partner Nikki Wyrd, through a maze of different profiles, web-sites, child abuse accusations by the mother of the abused child, as well as causing the distress responsible for the sectioning of our beloved Hampstead activist, Jake Clarke.

This comment, made by “Pallas Athena” can be found here and is web-archived here , displays several relationships of “Satanicviews” and is a very important piece to point out.  We will show you how this connects blogger “Satanicviews” with “Blog of Baphomet” author, leader of the cult Illuminates of Thanateros, and “List 616” author Julian Vayne.


The Hampstead researchers and activists that have been around from the beginning of the case, since early February 2015, when the videos were first leaked on Henry Curteis’ “TapBlog” might remember our first run-in with a profile named “Jay Vendoza”.  Jay Vendoza left a rather cryptic message on one of our open groups, it read;


We searched Jay Vendoza and found his Disqus profile with this cute little devil avatar


We searched Facebook for “Jay Vendoza”, it had been renamed to “James Hind”.


James Hind is a self-proclaimed satanist, occultist and creeper of the left-hand path. Notice the same little devil avatar.


James Hind on Twitter


On Twitter, James Hind posted many threats and addresses 


An article posted today 4/10/16 by “Satanicviews” on his blog “Satanicviews, Hardcore views on international satanism”, writes,

“The Satan Hunter Jake Clarke was sectioned in a mental asylum by his own agency, encouraged by Satan Hunters Angela Power Disney and Rupert Quaintance.  I warned Clarke what to expect since I foresaw what would happen to him if he continued on his path, he ignored me, he suffered the fate he deserved.  Any misfortune that Harris and his Satan Hunter fellows bring upon themselves is by their own agency, it has nothing to do with me, Satan or any other external agency.”


Here is a “Blog Share” post on Hoaxted Research about James Hind’s blog “Satanic Views”


Then James Hind started a blog called “List 616” , however, it’s now deleted.


List 616 was a list of “Satan Hunters” to be watched 



Jake Clarke was on this List616


Now we have Nathaniel J Harris who has multiple run-ins with a troll and finds himself on “List 616” and Nathaniel is not too happy about it.

*Take note of the “clown” photo.*


Nathaniel J Harris was, perhaps he still is, a chaos magician, an author, a blogger and a cult whistleblower.  He made this video to warn the occult communities about the dangers of child-sexual abuse within them.   Nathaniel was once partners with a woman named Nikki Wyrd (nee Nicola Ward) and they had a baby together.  They have long since broken up and are with other partners.  Nikki Wyrd is administrator on a Facebook group called “Illuminates of Thanateros”



Nikki Wyrd is now partners with Julian Vayne (nee Juian LeFay), they both appear to be absolute narcissists.  Both profiles are filled with photos of themselves, almost always with glasses on…


Julian Vayne writes for the “Blog of Baphomet” as does Nikki Wyrd.  The two wrote “The Book of Baphomet” together as well as both are contributors at the “Psychedelic PressUK” 


Nathaniel Harris has been partners now for over 10 years with a woman named Jasmin DaVille (I hope you two don’t mind, this photo is priceless, love it! Thank you!)


Jasmine has a child that was brutally abused by Colin Bately and other members of the IOT as described in Jasmine’s new blog called,“Occult Paedophile Ring-The Truth” where she writes 

“Nathaniel and I get on with the lives we have now but our minds relive the horror of the disclosures my child made to us. One of the most difficult was my child telling Nathaniel that his own parents, his mother Ann, his stepfather Adrian Bryn-Evans, and his biological father Robert Harris were all involved, as was Nicola Ward (aka Nikki Wyrd), the mother of his daughter, and her partner Julian Vayne, as well as a number of others known to us.”

Jasmine, in her lovely voice speaks about finding, or rather not finding, justice for her child and realizes perhaps there is no justice to be found in this world. Listen to her in this video.  There WILL come a time when justice will be served, of this I am sure.


I received this message today here on the website from a Hoaxtead Research admin “Pallas Athene” regarding our post today, I will share it here for you all to see.


Nikki, darling, I gave a lovely introduction to Mr. Harris and Ms. Jasmine. I know who Mr. Harris is.  I’ve read his blog.  That’s how I’ve known who you were long before you sent this snarling, jealous ex-girlfriend rant.  Nobody else would waste so much hate-energy other than an ex-girlfriend.  Seriously.   There are none more judgmental than those who hate to be judged.  Your heart appears to be filled with hate and anger.  I’m sorry, but your heart should be filled with love, joy and true peace for you only get one chance and why waste that chance being bloody miserable all the time.  Life can be much more fulfilling and if it’s not, you’re doing something wrong.  I do not judge you or your religion, indeed no one should judge another based on their relationship with a higher power/energy.  I feel that is a very personal space existing within each of us.  

But you didn’t even need bother dropping by, Julian gave himself up over on Twitter already…. This happened 3/10/16






As if this was all a pre-conceived, orchestrated game.

Playing with a young mans freedom.

Julian didn’t deny it either when I called him “Julian” and sadly, none of his HoaxRes buddies that he tagged showed up to support him. No one.  Zip. Zero.  Zilch.  Sorry, guess the party’s over guys.  Not even a mention in the comments on the blog, totally weird.  Like you didn’t even exist to them.  Nice group of friends there Julian, that you spent defending for a year, eh?  Wow!  Dearman’s a bitch!  When you decide to give him up come see me!  BTC on Fb pm’s

Anyway, we’ve recently caught SatanicViews leaving the Hampstead case where he says Hoaxtead Research should not DELETE all material related to Jake Clarke. Hoaxtead Research has either deleted or hidden ALL CONTENT RELATED TO JAKE CLARKE for fear of liability.  Because they KNOW they are culpable in his sectioning.  Especially James Hind, who we can now know is Julian Vayne (Julian LeFay)  

Go get him Clarke Family….your son and brother is a victim of intentional harassment in order to stop him from finding out the truth…that there is wide-spread child sexual abuse happening within these cults.




Rabbit holes run so very deep and this worries me



Julian says he was teaching in an “INFANTS SCHOOL”on 18/11/15, teaching infants about “Sex & History”.  To infants.  Where he saw the nonsense poem “Pangolin”.

These next screen shots are taken from “Sex & History” website linked above…



A video on the website, “Intimate Worlds exhibition: exploring Sexual Health and Education possibilities” is described as (Published on Nov 13, 2013)

“As part their public engagement programme, in the run-up to the Intimate Worlds exhibition, experts from Exeter’s Royal Albert Memorial Museum and the University of Exeter meet representatives from the health and education sectors to discuss how this beautiful and candid display of sexually-themed objects from history might best unlock its potential to enhance the delivery of sex education.


He works with children yet is a strong proponent of drug use & witchcraft…WOW!


Are we SURE James Hind is Julian?  Yes, we are…


The “ref” to arrest was this comment on Hoaxtead Research was…


Nathaniel Harris hadn’t told anyone he’d been arrested on harassment charges, the only person who would have known would be Julian/James.

As “James Hind”,  Julian posted this on Twitter….


Is this the person you want teaching your children about “Sex & History”?



I changed their  “chaos sigil” to love…


May love conquer all, heal all and above all…prevail!





Threats To Anonymous #OpHampstead & Jake C. From Satanists

First of all, let’s get one thing clear….


When you threaten one Anonymous page, you threaten all of Anonymous.

We became aware of some serious threats when a supporter of Anonymous #OpHampstead, who IS NOT THE ADMIN OF THE PAGE, but a SUPPORTER of the page, told us he was being harassed.  His name is blurred out for his protection, but Jake C. was thought to be the admin solely based on the fact that he shared their posts on Facebook.  In fact, Jake’s home address was published on Twitter.  It was quickly reported and taken down, however, many threats to the Anonymous page & Twitter account have been issued by satanist James Hind, also known as “SatanicViews”, more recently found out to be Julian Vayne, author of “The Blog of Baphomet”.  SEE THIS POST

Here they are:



James Hind @views_s 







Lol, REALLY?!?!  I think there are literally MILLIONS of people that would absolutely DISAGREE with you James Hind.  There are child abuse issues in EVERY religion, your religion is no different than any other.  PERIOD.

James Hind even posted Jake’s address where he lives.  This tweet was reported and taken down very quickly.  But do you see the level of intimidation directed at Jake?


James Hind also ran a blog called “List 616”, which is no longer “live”.


Photo from James Hind’s Twitter Account


The myriads of blog posts tagged with “Jake Cl…” from Hoaxtead Research (use your VPN when visiting & commenting there will give the blog your IP address, location & email-beware)  recently made all of their posts “Private”, knowing full well how much abuse those very articles included.  These screen captures were from the search results.





MKULTRA 666 Video about Jake is here and here.

A recent posting by fake profile, JHind, states how he supports new UK legislation AGAINST internet trolling…laughable really.  YOU are the TROLL.




And sent many private messages like this with your FAKE profile imitating ME…


A fantastic account of the implosion of Julian Vain, Nikki Weird, the id-IOT happening now… PETER J. CARROLL, THE I.O.T. & RITUAL CHILD ABUSE


The activists and child protection campaigners are NOT ATTACKING YOUR RELIGION.  We are after a paedo-sadistic, child/infant snuff film-producing sex cult that uses their videos to blackmail the elites, politicians, judges and in fact, royalty.  This is bigger than your measly threats, it’s bigger than most people can wrap their minds around.  We don’t care if you worship your own piss, let alone satan or lucifer while murdering a child, drinking its’ blood or eating its’ flesh.  What we are opposed to is the murdering children part.  The sexually abusing children part.  The torture of children while wearing horrific masks to cover your faces and robes to hide your body so you cannot be recognized in the videos you make.  So please understand when we activists say,


The Jean-Clement Recording

From “Hampstead Cover-Up” 

Audio Here “The concealed evidence – Jean Clement’s recording”


Link to meme by @Drifloud

Audio transcript by Kane Slater Creator & Manager, CANNABIS CURES CANCERS! & United Kingdom Prime Minister Theresa May Eats Babies


Gabriel and Alisa Dearman, ages 8 and 9, speaking with their mother’s boyfriend, Abraham Christie, and their mother, Ella Gareeva, at the home of Abraham’s brother-in-law, London Metropolitan Police Special Constable Jean-Clement Yaohirou September 4, 2014
[My comments in brackets. –K.S.]
Abraham: Don’t tell Jean-Clement any lies.
Alisa: Yes.
Abraham: Do you hear me?
Alisa: Yes, Papa.
Abraham: Otherwise we’ll have to lock you up in the jail. Have you got room in the jail to lock her up tonight?
Jean-Clement: (laughter) Abraham: Have you got room, yes or no?
Jean-Clement: She is too pretty for that. (laughter)
Abraham: So, uh, tell him what you said: You deserve to be locked up for killing the babies. Listen, did you kill any babies?
Alisa: No.
Abraham: Who killed the babies?
Alisa: Papa. Papa hold our hand.
Jean-Clement: Hold your hands?
Abraham: Yeah.
Alisa: We put on our hand, but –
Jean-Clement: Yeah.
Abraham: He makes you put your – No, he puts your hand on.
Alisa: And then he puts his hand on ours, cuts off the baby’s head off. He’s strong. Abraham: He teaches you –
Alisa: He pushes, he pushes down and he teaches us how to cut the baby. He says he wants us to do it when we’re older.
Abraham: What you think? What, you don’t understand what I’m telling you? They are killing babies, wholesale … wholesale. They are killing them, they are drinking the blood, and they are eating the meat. And the skulls of the babies, they are tying them, four skulls here, here, four skulls here, one here, two here, one here, two here, elbows here. And they are making – what about the shoes? This baby-skin –
Alisa: Yes, baby, baby-skin shoes.
Abraham: Who makes the baby-skin shoes?
Alisa: Felix. There’s one man they call Felix, and Daniel.
Abraham: What is his normal job? Is he a shoemaker?
Alisa: Yes. He’s a shoemaker.
Abraham: What about the doctor? What about the doctor, is he, is he one as well?
Alisa: Yes.
Abraham: What about your headmistress, is she one as well?
Alisa: Yes.
Abraham: How many skulls does she wear when she dances?
Alisa: Twenty.
Abraham: So, uh –
Jean-Clement: Twenty baby — ?
Abraham: So how many, how many adults are involved?
Alisa: Like maybe like ooh four hundred, four hundred plus thir – four hundred fifty, four hundred thirty, something like that.
Abraham: Over four hundred adults are involved. And how many skulls do they wear each? … How many skulls do they wear?
Alisa: Uh, twenty.
Abraham: So there’s over four hundred adults and they’re all wearing twenty skulls each. Can you do the math? Over eight hundred. [Actually, the math on that works out to over eight thousand skulls.]
Abraham: All three children are involved in the cult now. From two different men, who are cult members. She came to me, because she knew I didn’t, I wasn’t a weird guy. She knew there was something, I was clean. And she knew, in her heart, that I could help her. She didn’t know how. I didn’t know how. … Her first husband, he sent the second man to her. Some of her friends that come to the house …
Jean-Clement: Uh-huh.
Abraham: They come to the house and they go to the school and sex the children, behind her back.
Jean-Clement: Is uh, is uh, is that … in the school? Abraham: In the school, in the church, in McDonald’s, at the swimming pool, at the local swimming pool.
Gabriel (?): In houses.
Abraham: And in people’s houses.
Jean-Clement: A club, like?
Abraham: Yeah.
Jean-Clement: OK.
Abraham: And in their houses, and in their houses. Happens in school during school hours, you go there on a Wednesday and you will arrest them all. And you will take the children in the school ‘cause they do it to every child in the school. And I guarantee you, out of the children, one hundred of them will talk.
Jean-Clement: How come the parents don’t know?
Abraham: Because the parents are all involved.
Alisa: All of them.
Abraham: That’s why it’s kept a secret.
Jean-Clement: A private school?
Abraham: No, Hampstead school, posh school.
Gabriel: It’s boys mixed, with boys.
Alisa: It’s boys mixed with girls.
Abraham: It’s all social, they’re all social climbers.
Jean-Clement: Ah, so they select the people to come to the school.
Abraham: That’s right.
Alisa: And they sell us for 50 Pounds each. So Papa sells me and Gabriel —
Abraham: At the parties. And a hundred people do sex to them. A hundred people do sex to them.
Jean-Clement: [inaudible]
Abraham: No, a hundred people do sex to them, each. So its two hundred, sex, two hundred times sex, two hundred times fifty is how much?
Alisa: Two hundred plus thirty?
Abraham: Ten grand. I’ve done the maths already. Ten thousand Pounds. That’s just, he also sells the videos. What else does he sell, too? A whole – shut up. He makes movies. He makes snuff movies of the babies. And he sells them in the Ukraine, in Russia, in Brazil, in Portugal, in Brussels, in England, he sells them all over the world. Tell Papa about the movies.
Gabriel: There’s a, there’s a, there’s a Mum, I got a, a, a, I got a friend called James in my class. And his mother’s called Galyna, and she’s Ukrainian, and she, um, she translates the movies, and she, she translates it, and she also, um …
Alisa: And it’s like movies of them doing sex to me and Gabriel, to the children in school, it’s like them doing sex and uh, they’re doing sex to each other, and then, and then they sometimes they make movies of them, them dancing.
Jean-Clement: How old are you two?
Gabriel: I’m eight and she’s nine, but I’m taller than she is.
Abraham: He’s supposed to see them. He organized a party for the 31st of August. We didn’t let him get the children because we know what he wants to do to them. When he finds out what they have told me, he will kill them.
Jean-Clement: So he doesn’t know yet?
Abraham: Of course he doesn’t know.
Jean-Clement: So he doesn’t know they’re here?
Abraham: He doesn’t know they’re here yet. He will find out. He will find out because we have to give the passports back to the solicitor, who is a member of the pedophile group.
Jean-Clement: Why can’t they change schools?
Abraham: They can’t change school.
Jean-Clement: They can’t?
Abraham: We were going to do that, but, No.
Jean-Clement: [inaudible]
Abraham: He’s gonna get them, he’s gonna get them if we don’t protect them, he’s gonna get them.
Jean-Clement: But is he got a court order to see them?
Abraham: But were not going to let him see them. We can’t let him see them. They will kill them.
Alisa: They’ll sacra – sacrifice us, the same like the baby. So they’ll eat us, themselves … Abraham: Now you understand my dilemma.
Abraham: So the father, he’s waiting and he has a court –
Jean-Clement: For them to go back to school?
Abraham: No, not only that. He has a visiting, he’s taken the mother to court now again. Jean-Clement: OK.
Abraham: Because he wants to see his children. But why does he want to see them? To do sex to them, to make party, to sell them to other people, and to make movies. We cannot let that happen any more, Jean-Clement. You understand?
Jean-Clement: OK.
Abraham: We cannot allow it to happen any more. Tell him about Papa’s secret room and what he does there. Secret rooms.
Jean-Clement: Can they stay here then?
Abraham: Where?
Jean-Clement: Here.
Abraham: What for? They can, but they will touch each other. And you can’t feed them, you can’t feed them the diet they need. They are vegan, raw vegan. Their mother won’t let them eat anything –
Jean-Clement: Unless they stay with mother then.
Abraham: Where?
Jean-Clement: Here.
Abraham: Stay with their mother here? Yeah. They could stay with us, they could stay with us where they are.
Jean-Clement: OK.
Abraham: We’re all friends.
Jean-Clement: There’s no problem with that.
Abraham: No, there’s problem. Has father got keys to the house?
Alisa: Yes.
Abraham: Is it a lie? Is it a lie?
Alisa: We gave him the keys –
Abraham: We do not have time for lies. Does father have keys to the house?
Alisa: No.
Abraham: What did you give him?
Alisa: Like I showed him the keys, and he copied it, in this key shop, and he got a spare copy of the keys, and I put, put it back to the keys, to our door.
Abraham: So he’s got copies of the keys? We can change the lock, that’s not a problem.
Abraham: Eh, don’t go to sleep. We’re gonna have a sandwich. Come on, come sit at the table. …
Abraham: Wash your hands, don’t make a mess. Come and sit over here together, yeah, please. You’s like a mint tea?
Alisa & Gabriel: Yes, please.
Alisa: Wash your hands, Gabriel. …
Abraham: Sit round at the table properly, son, don’t let me tell you again. Don’t let me tell you again. You sit round properly, thank-you. Thank-you. Need at bit more?
Gabriel: Uh-huh.
Abraham: You need a bit more ‘cause you’re going to have a little chocolate brownie with it and strawberries, is it alright?
Gabriel: Yes.
Abraham: Yeah.
Gabriel: [inaudible]
Abraham: At the table, you be quiet and you speak when you’re spoken to. Understand? Gabriel: Yes, Papa.
Abraham: Come on. Have some respect. Be respectful children, eh.
Alisa: And let’s help the children, let’s help each other.
Abraham: Yeah, let’s help each other and let’s make sure that no more children get killed, eh.
Gabriel: And we might uh –
Alisa: And make sure Papa goes to jail.
Alisa: If we see how your sister looks like.
Abraham: Here she is with my Mum. That’s my sister on the left, and that’s my Mum. Alisa: Your Mum looks really pretty.
Abraham: Aww …
Alisa: Your Mum looks just like our Mum … She’s a kind person.
Jean-Clement: So when everyone is gone, then they, they close the whole school?
Alisa: No … I don’t understand.
Abraham: When you’re Mum leaves in the morning –
Alisa: Yes.
Abraham: Are there other parents who know, and teachers who know —
Alisa: Yes. Yes.
Abraham: And children who know. What happens?
Alisa: They make sure the coast is clear. Mum is not there. Mum’s car is not there. Abraham: Why don’t they want your Mum to be there, why?
Alisa: Because they, they won’t touch none.
Abraham: Why?
Alisa: Because if they, if she doesn’t, they want her to know, they want her to be in it, but they know that if she is in it, she’s not like the kind of per – they know that she’s not the kind of person who’ll be in it, but they’re trying to get her in it.
Jean-Clement: OK. And why don’t you tell your Mum?
Alisa: Because is they keep – one is because they force us to, they tell us: If you tell them, if you tell Mum, you die, we’ll kill you, and your whole family.
Ella: So it was a hearing at the end of 2013. It was like inter, um, intermediate, um, and nothing was decided … because, you know, he wasn’t there for a year-and-a-half, they were, were reluctant to give him any contacts. Nevertheless, nevertheless in November there was anonymous call to NCPCC, child protection, um, agency, saying they give couple, uh, couple basically about me, saying that I’ve been abusive to children, I don’t feed them, I’m mentally unstable, and something else, um, something else. Apparently, I found, I was suspecting as much, a, um, neighbor, upstairs, that we had a bit of a problem, you know she didn’t like trampoline in the garden. I thought she just wanted to create problems.
Abraham: Trampoline … We had a big trampoline, we got a big trampoline in the garden. The neighbor above, she complained about the trampoline, she complained about just about anything should could find to complain.
Ella: But it was a communal garden. Actually, shouldn’t put an private property in the garden. But, you know, she didn’t like it. Apparently, the same lady she’s part of this cult as well. Now looks like they –
Jean-Clement: OK. The lady, she live above you …
Ella: Yeah.
Jean-Clement: … is part of the cult?
Ella: Yeah.
Jean-Clement: But you didn’t know?
Ella: I had no idea, I had no idea.
Jean-Clement: The kids never told you about any abuse that was happening to them?
Ella: Nothing at all.
Abraham: Did the lady upstairs abuse you? She never touched you, did she?
Alisa: No, but Papa is friends with her. She met, they met each other.
Abraham: Papa is friends with her. But she doesn’t have an appetite for children?
Alisa: No.
Abraham: She is just friends, she is just an associate of the cult, she helps them and they help her.
Alisa: She doesn’t, she doesn’t really like children.
Jean-Clement: OK.
Ella: She tries to cover things for him and –
Alisa: Aggressive.
Jean-Clement: Did she ever attended any of the … schools?
Alisa: Does she have children?
Jean-Clement: No. Did she attended any of the meetings?
Ella: The parties.
Jean-Clement: The cult.
Alisa: Yes. She’s friends with Papa. She’s friends with my Dad. But she doesn’t like, she doesn’t like the children, she doesn’t like touching them . Well, she does, she likes like what Papa’s doing to them. Because he’s mean to them, she’s mean to them, but she doesn’t touch them because she doesn’t like, she doesn’t even like to be near children. She’s not … she’s aggressive.
Jean-Clement: But she attended meeting?
Ella: She was at the parties?
Alisa: Yes.
Ella: … you know, these fun sex parties, which she told me …
Alisa: Yes, yes.
Ella: And she did do the, did she participated in the, um, you know, killing babies and drinking blood and all this?
Alisa: Yes, yes, yes. But she doesn’t, she doesn’t touch like, she doesn’t like children.
Jean-Clement: She doesn’t get involved, she just watches.
Alisa: Yes.
Jean-Clement: And she doesn’t get involved.
Alisa: Yes. But she does, she does sometimes does drink blood, she does.
Ella: And she eats meat as well?
Alisa: Yes. She usually does.
Jean-Clement: So when she goes there with you, and you know she goes there …
Alisa: Yes?
Jean-Clement: … and you see her …
Alisa: Uh-huh?
Jean-Clement: … in your … in the passage or in the corridor, do you speak to her?
Alisa: No. She doesn’t talk to children.
Jean-Clement: Oh, she doesn’t talk to children.
Alisa: She doesn’t like children. She doesn’t like.
Alisa: ‘Cause Mum, whenever she went into, whenever she meditated, me and Gabriel straight away touched each other.
Ella: I mean I was constantly running around. I, uh, single Mum, I was looking, I was looking after them and making food, you know this …
Alisa: And Gaia wasn’t clever, our touching, we hid away from her, in a park we, um, said we would go …
Jean-Clement: Who’s that?
Alisa: Gaia. Gaia, my nanny.
Jean-Clement: Oh, your nanny.
Alisa: Yes. She, um, she, she hardly spotted us touching. ‘Cause when we went to the park, um, um, we go, um “Me je peu rouler?” … that means: Can we go and have a little walk? Uh, myself, and then, um, and also we sometimes run and we like find sticks, and that when we run and she’s at the back of us, um, we touch each other that time. So she hardly ever spot us.
Ella: At some point, I did notice they were doing something. Um, once I caught them in the bathroom.
Alisa: You caught, you caught us touching, remember?
Ella: Once I came in the, like in the second bathroom in the old flat, and, um, I saw this, I didn’t SEE, but I thought when I came in they were doing something. Now what happened then, later, like a couple of days later, I look my phone, in my photographs, and Gabriel was filming Alisa without her underpants. Really short, like maybe under one minute. And so I had a word with them, looks like they became very skillful at hiding it from me. And, you know, like finding their ways to do that. Or like distracting me, saying that, you know, I’m hungry so I’ll prepare food, they go do it. And that was like kind of one of their tricks. And they developed like signs between them. OK, whenever I’m hungry, or I need to go to the toilet, let’s do that, let’s do that.
Abraham: Let’s go and touch each other. Let’s go and oh, they’d go like this, Mum’s talking, she’s talking, they wouldn’t say a word, she’d go like …
Ella: Behind my back.
Abraham: And they’d go and do sex, maybe go and do sex, or touch each other. Or she’d go like this …
Alisa: Mum, remember when you spot us …?
Abraham: Excuse me.
Alisa: Yes.
Abraham: Or she’d go like this … and then that’s another sign. What does that mean? Alisa: That means like, say that means: Mum’s not looking, she’s away, we can touch each other.
Abraham: And what is this one? What this one means? Stick out your bum?
Alisa: That means: Go to the toilet.
Abraham: Stick out the bum twice?
Alisa: And then, twice …
Abraham: And what does this one mean?
Alisa: That one means, that one means: Be careful of Mum. That one means, that one means: Be careful of Mum. The sticking out the bum TWICE means like, like: Go to the toilet and do it. Or just once, that means … put, put, uh, um, because Papa, Papa learned …
Abraham: Don’t tell me what, tell him what once means: Put poo on our food?
Alisa: Yes, because Papa, Papa …
Abraham: Don’t keep … Papa, right.
Alisa: He was learning us.
Abraham & Ella: Teaching us.
Alisa: He was teaching us.
Gabriel: Signs.
Alisa: To put, uh, poo on her food, and her toothbrush.
Abraham: Yeah. They took my toothbrush and they wiped it around the toilet. And I kept getting sick, I kept getting the runs and I couldn’t work out why. And then I worked it out. Then I worked it out. And then when I realized they were doing it, I didn’t make a big scene because we already had enough pressure by finding out this. So what I did I kept cool, and I moved my toothbrush from the sink where I usually kept it and I put it into my bag, to let them know I know what you were doing, I’m not going to make a scene for Mama, do not do it any more. And guess what, they did. They continued to do it to my toothbrush. So I raised it as an issue, and I gave them licks for it. I gave them good licks for it.
Ella: Now the thing is now when I learned about it all, I started to look back and I’ve seen this and now, now I’ve seen what is going on because, for example, when Alisa was like really tiny, maybe like under one years old, still in the pram, one time she was, she was like crying for, I don’t know, non-stop for maybe an hour. Like screaming, screaming, screaming … I mean she was fed, she was changed, she didn’t have anything bad to upset her stomach, she was screaming and screaming and screaming and, um, I think this was maybe the first time he did some sexual thing to her. And, um …
Alisa: And remember that time I was in this little baby bed and I was screaming there for hours, for like maybe one hour, and Marsha was there, Marsha still was with you, and then, uh, trying to calm me down, that’s what I remember.
Ella: So, and then, kind of like now I could, I could see what’s going on, what was going on … I could recognize it.
Abraham: In hindsight, in hindsight, now you know what’s been going on.
Ella: So I could kind of, in my memory, I could think this could mean, must be that, must be that. But, at the time, I had no idea.
Alisa: Mum couldn’t even imagine that, Mum couldn’t even imagine that, of Papa doing sex to us and we were killing babies, she couldn’t even, she couldn’t even think of that.
Jean-Clement: So you became aware now.
Ella: Yeah.
Jean-Clement: You know about it. So what happened?
Ella: Yeah, so what happened …
Jean-Clement: Did you confront the Dad? Ask him about it?
Ella: No, no.
Jean-Clement: Why not?
Ella: We, uh …
Abraham: We didn’t know, Jean-Clement. She didn’t know then.
Ella: We only discovered four weeks ago, this whole thing.
Abraham: We only discovered this …
Jean-Clement: Why didn’t you spoke today?
Abraham: Jean-Clement, listen to me. We only discovered this …
Ella: Just now, just now …
Abraham: One moment –
Ella: … two weeks ago.
Abraham: I suspected this, listen I had my first suspicions about, almost two months ago, I think maybe a month, almost two months ago, when I first heard his voice on the, on the Skype.
Ella: On Skype, yeah.
Abraham: That was when I had my suspicions. I wasn’t one hundred per cent sure.
Jean-Clement: Oh, from the sound of his voice?
Abraham: Yes!
Ella: Uh-huh.
Abraham: And also because of the clues I’ve had from the children’s behavior, from them touching the Dog.
Gabriel: Yeah, we were touching the Dog’s privates.
Abraham: And certain other clues.
Alisa: Papa also takes Dogs, and he tells us to touch the privates.
Abraham: So, and certain other clues, I began to suspect heavily. And then when we got to Morocco and I realized that they were touching each other on a regular basis, I said to them: You guys are doing this regularly, how come no one’s caught you? Who is touching you? Who? I know someone else is touching you, you’ve learned this from an adult. Who is it, who is it? And then they …
Jean-Clement: That’s when they unfolded.
Abraham: Then they opened this up.
Ella: What his address, um, what’s his address?
Alisa: Who, Papa’s? … 15, no, 16 Angel Road. Abraham: 16? You told me it’s 15.
Alisa: No, 16, 16.
Ella: They were changing this.
Abraham: You told me it was 15.
Alisa: No, it’s 16.
Abraham: You told me –
Ella: The reason I’m asking because I’ve got different, even, um …
Jean-Clement: That Angel Road in Hampstead?
Ella: No, this is in Islington.
Abraham: What’s his real address? What is it?
Alisa: 15 Angel Road.
Abraham: You just told them 16. Jean-Clement.
Jean-Clement: Yes?
Abraham: Jean-Clement, this one has to be watched.
Jean-Clement: No, no …
Abraham: No, no, no, don’t tell me anything. His address is 15 Angel Road, and she just told you it was 16 Angel Place, Angel Road, and she just told you it was 16. Pay close attention to this one.
Jean-Clement: Does this one or two building?
Abraham: Jean-Clement … no, no, Jean-Clement, I lived with her, you’re not listening to me.
Jean-Clement: OK Abraham: She lies. Instinctively. She lies.
Jean-Clement: So if you think she lies … why would you believe her story?
Abraham: Because I questioned her ten times, and then I will question him … we question them separately …
Jean-Clement: Oh, right.
Abraham: … like the police do.
Jean-Clement: OK.
Abraham: And anything that corresponds perfectly we, we, OK.
Jean-Clement: OK.
Abraham: The reason we know that the house, it doesn’t matter the number, we know the road and we know that it’s right on the corner, corner house. So if she tell us 15, 16, it doesn’t matter. It doesn’t matter she tell us 15, 16, 17, we know it’s the corner house. Don’t we?
Alisa: Yes.
Abraham: What’s the real address?
Alisa: Angel, Angel Road.
Abraham: What is the number, darling?
Alisa: It’s on the corner.
Abraham: What is the number? Don’t try to evade the question. What’s the number? Alisa: Number 15.
Abraham: Why did you tell us 16 just now? Go and wash your plate, please.
Jean-Clement: That’s probably because the information I was provided is meant to confusicate.
Abraham: What information was provided by who?
Ella: Make confusing, us.
Abraham: No, no, you are being naïve.
Jean-Clement: Where is provided to them …
Abraham: Can you stop being naïve? And can you just listen to us, who have the experience of dealing with them? She purposely, and expertly …
Ella: Was misleading.
Jean-Clement: That’s what she says. That’s what she was trained to do.
Abraham: No. Yes, she was trained.
Jean-Clement: That’s what she said.
Ella: Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Jean-Clement: So you have to understand that.
Abraham: No, we do understand that. But we’re letting you know.
Jean-Clement: It’s not purposely done. It’s done so that the story, when it goes out, nobody follows it. That how it’s made.
Ella: They’re mixing, they’re mixing some truthful facts with some lies. Mixing and mixing, mixing, so it took us four weeks to get to the …
Abraham: She actually attempts to mislead …
Jean-Clement: That’s why …
Abraham: She actually attempts. But because we know that when we are sometimes, this is another one of her, this is what she does … Ella and I, we will begin to discuss certain aspects of the situation …
Jean-Clement: OK.
Abraham: … and by discussing it …
Jean-Clement: Yeah.
Abraham: … we brainstorm, and together we come up, or we work out, we work things out.
Jean-Clement: OK.
Abraham: What she will do when we are talking, she will interrupt us …
Jean-Clement: Yeah.
Abraham: … and distract us with something. And send us, try to, attempt to send us in another complete … we say to her: Be quiet, don’t distract us any more.
Ella: And she would listen to our conversations.
Abraham: Oh, she eavesdrops on your conversations, and he does it as well.
Ella: And she would use the information she heard …
Abraham: And he does it.
Ella: … creating whatever, some kind of confusion between us.
Abraham: What you looking at him for? What you just, what was that look you just did to him? What was that look she just did to you?
Gabriel: It’s a sign to me.
Abraham: What was the sign?
Gabriel: The eye one.
Abraham: What does that mean?
Gabriel: That means I’m ready to …
Abraham: You’re ready to touch? Excuse me!
Jean-Clement: Yeah.
Abraham: Pay close attention. Because you think you know, but you don’t. Once you are talking, and once we are distracted explaining to you, because you don’t, you don’t know them.
Jean-Clement: Hmmm …
Abraham: So once we are distracted. Umm, how can I say? Um, once we are distracted explaining to you the situation, the enormousness of the situation, and how expertly they are able to distract, once we are doing this, she knows and she made an eye sign to him that “I am ready to touch.” Because they regularly touch, because the father questions them as to whether or not they have touched each other.
Ella: And if they haven’t, he would hurt them.
Abraham: Punish them.
Alisa: And sometime he accuses us.
Abraham: He accuses you of not doing it, even when you touch.
Gabriel: We touch it. And then he says: No, you haven’t, stop lying.
Ella: How many times? They supposed to do it five times at least. Yeah, five times a day? Alisa: Every day. Every single day.
Abraham: Ahh … now you’re getting some idea of the case, Jean-Clement. Alright, what we’re up against.
Ella: And even they’re saying he did, he will still hurt, hurt them.
Alisa: Anyway, he’ll hurt us anyway. Anyway.
Abraham: Because he takes, he takes sadistic pleasure in hurting you.
Ella: Also he would scream into the, Gabriel …
Abraham: He screams into his ear, he’s deaf in one ear. He screams into their ear. When are there – excuse me – when he is holding them to kill the baby with a knife, he’s screaming into their ear. What happens, who screams into your ear?
Gabriel: Alisa and Papa. Kill! Kill! Kill! Kill! Abraham: And what about the rest of the people, what do they say?
Gabriel: Kill! They say, they say …
Abraham: Tell me how they say it.
Alisa & Gabriel: They say: Kill! Kill! Kill! Kill! Like cheers.
Abraham: Say it. Say it how they say it.
Alisa & Gabriel: Kill! Kill! Kill! Kill! Kill!
Alisa: Like that. But then after, when it’s my turn to kill the baby, the others and Gabriel say Kill.
Abraham: And when it’s his turn to say it, you say it.
Alisa: Yes.
Abraham: What’s the word that you say?
Alisa: Kill.
Abraham: Say it more for me, I want to hear it.
Alisa: Kill, kill, kill, kill. Abraham: I like the sound of it. Can you say it together? Say it together? Let’s all say it together.
Abraham & Alisa & Gabriel: Kill! Kill! Kill! Kill!
Abraham: That’s what they say.
Gabriel: Then really loudly, in my ear.
Abraham: You getting the picture now? You’re getting the picture.
Gabriel: And they also, um, sometimes they say: Kill the baby! Kill the baby! Ella: It’s incredible.
Abraham: What do they say?
Gabriel: Kill the baby! Kill the baby! Kill the baby! Kill the baby!
Abraham: Let’s say it together, let’s say it together.
Abraham & Alisa & Gabriel: Kill the baby! Kill the baby! Kill the baby! Kill the baby! Abraham: Thank-you.
Gabriel: Like that.
Ella: He was doing to Alisa’s ears, while she’s not hearing very well in the other ear. Gabriel: I’m deaf in this one, completely deaf.
Ella: The thing is …
Alisa: Sometimes we do not listen to Mum. But usually is the, the reason is, because we can’t, we don’t listen to them is because we can’t hear them. That’s usually the point. But usually we sometimes do not listen to them.
Abraham: I love that honesty, I love that honesty, beautiful honesty that is.
Ella: On Wednesdays they had a special day in school …
Abraham: First time you tell them you killed baby …
Ella: … for example … up to sixty people could be abusing them in one day.
Abraham: Each.
Ella: They were putting broomsticks in their bottoms …
Abraham: Mama, mama, mama, let’s get the children to bed, please. It’s quarter past one. Please, can we get the children to bed? We are all so tired. I am tired.
Jean-Clement: Can I [inaudible] come to you, so that they will have time to sleep in? Abraham: Yes. You should come to us.
Jean-Clement: Is that better?
Abraham: Yes, yes, you should come to us. Yes, please, Jean-Clement. “S’il vous plait. S’il vous plait.” Can we go now?
Gabriel: And, um, they, um …
Abraham: Can we go now, please? Thank-you. I’ve been patiently asking since quarter-to-one. Thank-you.
Jean-Clement: Want me to copy this one? I, uh, keep all you got, make copies.
Ella: I’ll, I’ll …
Abraham: Can we do this tomorrow? Can we finish? Can we terminate now? Can we go now, please? I’m tired. Thank-you. Thank-you. Some of us have been working on this for a month, full-time, some of us haven’t slept for a month. Let’s go.
Ella: Thank-you very much. Nice, nice to meet you. Thank-you very much for your time. Abraham: I told you he’d, I told you he’d be perfect, perfect man for the job. Patient, patient. He’s kind, he’s thorough.
End of recording
“Judge” Anna Pauffley listened to the “very lengthy audio recording” made by Special constable Jean Clement Yaohirou. This recording was the very first disclosure to the police reporting the rapes and murders at Hampstead Christ Church primary school and church, 5.9.14. ANYONE listening to this recording immediately realises the seriousness of the allegations, and that this is NOT a custody dispute, OR a matter for a “Family Court”: it is the report of rape, torture and murder of children. Starting at around 1hr 25mins on the recording, the children begin to describe a black wart, “about the size of a five pence piece” on the vaginal “lips” of school nurse, Ms Marden. They go on to describe a “devil” tattoo Marden has on her pudendum, where her wart looks as if it is on the “devil’s cheek”. Both alisa and gabriel state clearly that all the teachers have these genital tattoos, as do the parents and children taking part in the “fun, sex parties”. This “TATTOO” testimony is highly-incriminating IDENTIFYING evidence, yet Pauffley in her so-called “judgement” (19-3-15) does NOT mention one word about these tattoos, or any of the genital markings such as piercings, birthmarks or warts the children had described on their NAMED attackers. “Judge” Pauffley KNEW the police had concealed this damning recording the same day they received it, and that it never formed part of their so-called investigation. Pauffley KNEW the concealment of this evidence by the police was a criminal act: FRAUD. “Judge” Anna Pauffley also KNEW, by being aware of this FACT, yet continuing with her Family Court “fact-finding hearing” – instead of halting it the moment she realised there had been no investigation of the tattoos/genital marks – that she too was committing FRAUD. This recording and its FRAUDULENT concealment of its important and highly-incriminating identifying testimony/evidence, proves that DI John Cannon 189067, DS Matthew Fernandez 205219, DC Steve Martin 219414, DC Alan Rogers 207875, DC Carl Savage (warrant number NOT recorded in police CRIS report) along with “Judge” Anna Pauffley and “Judge” Nigel Ryder, have ALL participated in FRAUD in order to cover-up the Hampstead Christ Church Child Rapes and Murders. THERE WAS NO INVESTIGATION, ONLY A COVER-UP FROM THE VERY FIRST DAY.
“They now revealed that it was their father who was teaching them to do this. Moreover, he was forcing them to steal for him. The large amounts of money were missing both from Mr Christie’s wallet and my purse.In May-June 2014 the large amounts were taken from my credit card. Alisa says that her dad asked her to write the card details for him. This incident was reported to the bank. Mr Dearman forced Alisa to steal Mr Christie’s iPhone (along with the other few possessions), which according to the children, was then used by Mr Dearman to film the sexual abuse scenes.I was constantly seeking the answers to the situation, asked the school….” Did you forget about this piece of evidence Mr.Dearman ? How is your ploy to fit Abe’s phone up with CHILD PORN working out Mr. Dearman ?. YOU advertise your own daughter for sale/sex on your CHILD PORN sites. mention the word PORN at least 7 times in your police interview where you are being questioned regarding sodomising the children. YOU tell Ella that you believe you’ve seen her on a PORN site during a Skype conversation with the children present. YOU pester Ella with PORNOGRAPHIC texts messages, which she eventually reports to the “Police.” YOU produce CHILD PORN snuff movies, the children testified. YOU attempt to fit Abraham up with CHILD PORN on his phone that you told the children to steal for you. Can you see a pattern Mr Dearman ? Would you like some assistance ? YOU and CHILD PORN is the repetitive pattern. Your straw man attacks on Abraham have failed, (but don’t let that stop you) because YOU have attracted more attention to YOUR links to CHILD PORN and snuff movies, David (Porky) Cameron’s Big Society money laundering, FRAUD and your off shore banking services, 1000’s of innocent children’s deaths each year, organ trafficking… Keep grabbing all you can, you’ll be able to take it ALL to Hell with you. Ask not for whom the Bell tolls…. “ Abraham
“The statement in Dr. Hodes medical report is: “Physical findings today further confirm the allegations of inflicted anal injury from insertion of a blunt penetrative force and are consistent with the allegations of sexual abuse.” That is quite clear and unequivocal and in conjunction with the children’s detailed disclosure and symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder, this should have been enough evidence to prompt an immediate criminal investigation. Dearman et al repeatedly attempt to obfuscate and deny the unequivocal nature of Dr. Hodes’ findings. Why ?“
Ricky Dearman- Have you considered that your perception of what the audio reveals is tainted by your desire to “blackjacket” me because you hold me responsible for exposing you ? The children REALLY exposed you, hemp was the catalyst. This audio was concealed by D.C. Rogers and D.I. Cannon because any decent human being can hear the children speaking freely of their experiences with you and your degenerate associates, corroborating the private videos, police ABE interviews and testimonies in the extensive file handed to Barnet Police by Ella on September 5th 2014. This audio has the ring of TRUTH. Something that an inveterate liar may have difficulty hearing. As a generational Satanist ( listen to the children explain in this audio) you were introduced by Christ Church School teacher Claire Wilmer to other teachers/Satanists involved in State sponsored Trauma Based Mind Control (TBMC) programs which have infested numerous schools, nurseries, hospitals, and private dwellings in & around Hampstead and throughout U.K. All with the full participation of Head Teacher, Kate ( Port Wine Stain Birth Marked pudendum with TATTOO and gold Piece rings, on extended paid leave at the taxpayers expense.) Forsdyke, and school nurse Nina ( large black mole the size of a five pence piece on the cheek of her pudendum Baphomet/Devil TATTOO) Marden, AND not forgetting your BFF Best Friend Forever, Louis(a) ( Spotted Dick) Hollings. How is Father Paul. the Christ Church priest, with his pudenda TATTOO and piercings down his back? Still in hiding in Spain. Do you suppose Camden Education Board knows anything about it !!?? Say hi to Sophie ( Devil TATTOOED pudenda, Adrenal Fatigue) Dix at the BBC. Perhaps she can wrangle another interview for you. Your narcissistic psychopathic ego caused you to believe that you could TBMC the children without their mother ( of course you ordered the children to “make it difficult” for Ella, even encouraging them to commit matricide) or anyone else suspecting. Such arrogance… but then if you’re off shore banking the proceeds of money laundering scams involving Galyna and Mark( TATTOOED pudendum and genitalia) Upson, Prime Minister David (Porky) Cameron and others, whilst also supplying child/snuff porn, cocaine and organising “Fun Sex Parties” for Thelamites, Satanists, sodomites and sadists you could be forgiven for considering yourself invincible. Cocaine can have that effect. How long did you think you could get away with it !? STATE SPONSORED TRAUMA BASED MIND CONTROL STOPS HERE ! FREE THE HAMPSTEAD 2 !“ Abraham

Getting To The Root Of The Hampstead Situation

There is one single person responsible for this entire Hampstead situation, drum roll please….


Link to photo

Will Draper.

Ella Draper’s first husband.  He is responsible for sending Ricky Dearman to Ella.  From the “Jean-Clement recording“,…

All three children are involved in the cult now. From two different men, who are cult members. She came to me, because she knew I didn’t, I wasn’t a weird guy. She knew there was something, I was clean. And she knew, in her heart, that I could help her. She didn’t know how. I didn’t know how. … Her first husband, he sent the second man to her. “

Why doesn’t anyone talk about this?

Mr. Draper & his wife “Sara” were in the same cult as Ricky Dearman.  Will Draper is supposedly the cult financier, which would make sense since he works in the banking industry.

“Originally from the city of Rostov in southern Russia, Ella Draper – or Ella Gareeva as she then was – attended Moscow State University, where she graduated with a masters degree in history of art.

“It was in Moscow in the Nineties that she met a British banker who would become her first husband (Will Draper).

“She became pregnant and moved to Britain around 17 years ago to raise their son; he still lives with his father (Will Draper) in the Home Counties.
“The marriage eventually ended, but she kept her married name and went on to have two children with the actor Ricky Dearman.”
So let’s see if we’ve got this straight…Will Draper met Ella in Moscow while she was getting her masters in art history, got her pregnant and they moved to the UK.  Away from her family, in a foreign land, she gave birth to their son James.  Got it.
Things didn’t work out so Mr.& Mrs. Draper divorced and Ella was left to raise their son.
Mr. Draper then sends his cult buddy Ricky Dearman to Ella to produce more children, thus child A & child G.  Knowing full well that Ricky Dearman was in his cult, Will Draper must have known how abusive and sadistic Ricky Dearman was.
James, Ella’s first son with Will Draper, was a witness firsthand to Ricky Dearman’s abusive ways.
From Ella’s testimony:

“The Past of an Abuser as Father”

“Mr Dearman has never provided financially for the children, except £10 per child per month taken off his benefits during the last 3-4 years. He hardly ever spent any quality time with them at home. He would never read a book or play games with them. The only game he seemed to play was the “tickling game”. I wasn’t happy about this since it always led to some kind of abuse. For example, Mr Dearman wouldn’t stop tickling children even though they would scream for him to stop. Besides, he would normally start this odd game late in the evening when the children would already have taken a bath and be ready for bed. This would send them hyper and those situations would almost always end up in arguments since I wanted to protect the children.

Furthermore, all of a sudden James started to dislike Mr Dearman. Mr Dearman responded with humiliating remarks and attempted to discipline James in strange ways. For example, he would lock him up, while I was at work or shopping, and he would give him a bucket to pee and poo. This would almost always also result in arguments.

He also harassed me sexually, pressuring me to have anal sex with him. He then bought a gigantic artificial penis suggesting for me to use. On many occasions he attempted to get me to watch online pornography.

I objected to his perverted sexual attempts, threw the sex toy in the bin and asked Mr Dearman to pick his stuff he had in my house and not to come there again. (2007) However, he came to school to “surprise” the children and often stalked us, showing up from nowhere: in the park, or on the way to school and in shops.

I warned him on many occasions to stop doing this. But he requested to see the children. Many times he came and knocked on my door without prior notice and several times he broke in through the garden door. On one of such occasions he was violent and humiliated my mother by screaming and hitting her. He ran away before I dialed the police.

Since stalking continued, I applied for an Emergency Court Order, and a Non-Molestation Order was granted for a month initially and then extended for 8 months while proceedings for contact were going on.

I sent Alisa to Russia to stay with my parents. Unfortunately her passport ran out and she ended up staying slightly longer than anticipated.

A week after my application, his solicitors applied for a Prohibited Steps Order since he claimed that I was trying to take the children out of the country. This was dismissed and there is currently no such Order in place.

Mr Dearman also made an application for contact. This was eventually granted in spite of my concerns for the children’s safety. He started to see them regularly: every Saturday from 10am to 6pm.

However, contacts were not going well at all. Mr Dearman was consistently returning the children late. He rejected my advice regarding their diet and was returning packed lunches of home prepared food.

Alisa and Gabriel were frequently getting sick during contact. Many times they vomited while in his care or after they came back home. Sometimes they developed headaches and stomach aches. I blamed this on food that Mr Dearman was feeding them with.

My solicitors and I have sent numerous reminders, requesting not to feed the children with processed, sugary snacks. On one occasion Alisa developed high fever and hardly moved. I contacted the emergency doctor’s line and almost took her to the emergency room.

Not only were the children returning sick or becoming sick shortly after, each time they were coming back in a terrible emotional and psychological state. A lot of Mondays or first part of the school week were missed as a result and affected the children’s education.”

Knowing all of this was going on, Will Draper never spoke up?  He never wanted to protect his ex-wife?  The ex-wife he brought to London from Russia?   Will Draper knows what Child “A” & Child “G” have gone through yet he ‘allows’ the cover-up to continue while he lives his life with his perfect little family, nice cushy financier life-style sending young James off to university and allowing Ella to be run out of the country when 9 police officers show up without a warrant at her flat, equipped with a medical kit (yes, a medical kit.  “For what?” you ask?  To drug Ella and kidnap her, to shut her up of course).

What kind of a man DOES that???

Will Draper is often times quoted in the Financial Times and other news outlets, so it’s ‘business as usual’ for him apparently.

I wonder what it feels like to see your ex-wife splashed all over the front pages of Britain’s newspapers with headlines like these, knowing full-well the cover-up going on:

“Police hunting runaway mother who tortured her two children into inventing fantasy claims about a satanic sex cult run by their father”

“Evil’ ex-wife who forced children to claim father was leader of satanic paedophile cult is hunted by police”

“Mystery of mum who tortured her young kids into inventing claims they were abused by satanic cult”

And you people act as if things like this don’t go on, “There’s no cult!” you say…lol…okay!

“Colin Batley, leader of sex cult preying on children, could spend life in jail”

The Satanists of Ash Tree Close: ‘Evil’ paedophile found guilty of running sex cult from cul-de-sac in seaside village”

Cult UK  Britain has 1,000 sects… and many are based in ordinary homes”

VIP paedophile networks ‘shut down police investigations which got too close’, retired officers claim”

“Jimmy Savile was part of satanic ring

But yeah, it doesn’t exist…nothing to see here, move along…

“SATANIC RITUAL ABUSE U.K. – Convictions so far” by Nathaniel J Harris

There WILL BE justice, Will Draper & Ricky Dearman.  It may take 10 years to come, but it will come.  Will Draper, you need to find a way to correct this situation, seriously!


Dearman’s Cult Is Harassing Pensioners

Here are screen grabs from the MK Ultra 666 collection of hate-filled, dark and disturbing occult-flavored videos which targets many of the activists working on the Hampstead child abuse cover up.  There is most definitively a campaign against those of us whom dare to speak out against their abusive ways.

From “PureHatred”



From “Ella Draper Face Yoga To The Rescue”





From “Stop Child Abuse! Warning Some Pictures Are Graphic”



From “Stop Child Abuse Now”



From “Ella Draper Abuse Cult…..The Beginning”


From “Sabine McNeill & the cult of Kuntz”



From “Silence Becomes Cowardice”


From “Crucify Your Mind: Hampstead & Beyond Update Activist Sabine McNeill”





From “Sabine McNeill Shoots Herself In The Foot”




Threats From Twitter- “DaCosta Living” Tattoos


From “Zelie-Cat” Belinda Tattoo


Zelie-Cat follows known Satanists



Zelie-Cat then jokes about her first appearance on my blog, thinking this is all a joke…From Twitter


Excuse me but THIS IS NOT A JOKE! 

Child Abuse is NOT a joke.  Ever.  

What this is, what you people are doing, is SICK.

Your sick jokes about Sabine, Belinda, Abe, Ella and Angela are exactly what lawyers are looking for when it comes to character traits.  Are these character traits consistent with an innocent father?  No.


Now, here’s the interesting part- In Jane Doe MK II’s “Playlist” Section we find a video with the name “Anal Beard-Rub Me Out…for MELINA” by Fraz Robb, who also has a rather creepy profile….So this is our MELINA GORSTMAN who is featured in our “Left-Hand Path Connections”


So Melina Gorstman, who likes a band called “Anal Beard”, who seems to comment on all MK Ultra 666 videos, are you MK Ultra 666?






We’ll be getting into this more on it’s own post soon….in the mean time:

On a more serious note, Satanist James Hind thinks WE activists should be monitored.  He is the author of the “List 616”


Many activists are listed here;


There is a massive amount of screen grabs that can be shown, these are just a few of them.  The threats are real.  The fear-mongering is real. And this cult of abuse is real.

There is no denying this fact.  We are NOT JOKING!



To The People Of Hampstead

There was a comment left on HoaxResearch recently that has shook that blog to their core.  Let me post it for you


In case that screen shot is not clear enough, here is the text of that comment:

“The People of Hampstead”

March 9, 2016

“Let me get this straight. This blog is to prove that the children were not abused by a Satanic Cult. And your genius way of doing this is by getting James Hind, a Satanist, to be one of your main correspondence.

And you wonder why people still think this blog is run by the children’s father as part of the named Satanic cult?

May I also take this opportunity to remind you that threatening to commit [scienter] and or engaging in criminal acts, such as online bullying, hacking and DDOS attacks, is highly illegal and punishable with imprisonment.

For more on the subject see the following acts:

The Computer Misuse Act 1990
The Terrorism Act 2000
Malicious Communications Act 1988
Protection from Harassment Act 1996

As an ex-police military officer, I could quite easily refer this for further investigation. However; as a cyber crimes investigator, I am pretty sure Mr Hines does not have the resources or know-how to commit such offences and is just scaremongering.

Not that anyone reads his insane blog anyway! He is, perhaps, in need of some professional help to combat the issues he faced as a child?

I if this blog really does have good intentions, I strongly suggest it cleans its act up. As we see it, it damages the reputation of innocent people around Hampstead who have been wrongly accused.

The people of Hampstead do not want to be associated with people that harass others and who support Satanists.

The courts have already made its judgement and the case has been put to bed. We do not need internet trolls damaging our names any further.

Consider this a friendly warning from various people around Hampstead that are being directly effected by this blog and the damage it’s doing to us.

We have a lot of financial might to take things further if the harassment and illegal activities of this blog and related networks continue. You may think you’re doing the right thing, but you are damaging our reputations.

Please stop. This is not a childish game!”

Indeed, it is NOT a game.

I do want to point out, however, one inconsistency with this comment, “The courts have already made its judgement and the case has been put to bed. We do not need internet trolls damaging our names any further.”

Ms. Draper has written to the IPCC (INDEPENDENT POLICE COMPLAINTS COMMISSION) with a list of complaints and received a response recommending that Barnet Police Department re-open the case.

Here is my blog entry about the IPCC letter and here is Ms. Drapers blog entry on her blog “”.  Ms. Draper’s post has much more information regarding the IPCC letter and responses.

Again, then next day, HoaxRes received another comment.  This time by a 16 year old girl by the name of “Amy”


This is how they responded:


I want to remind you, when you comment on a WordPress blog, the author receives an email with your IP address, as well as a link to whois dot net-like this


I personally have NEVER commented there for this reason.  Mr. Dearman has made a fake profile using my photo as “DaCosta Living” and uses it often.  But this is a warning if you do not want your IP address in the hands of this group, then you should not comment there.  Lest it be used against you like this:



It’s been more than a year that this case has been in the public arena.  There are many people who’ve been researching this case since last February (2015).  We have been harassed beyond measure.  For researching the allegations by two children who could have never known of that which they spoke unless they, indeed, experienced the things they so eloquently spoke of.   They gave similar testimonies, independent of each other.  The law says when two people give testimony of similar events, separate and independent of each other, then an investigation of the allegations must commence.  When the children were in police custody, they gave separate and independent but contrasting retractions.  Like this;



Also I am reminded by a fellow researcher, whose name I will with-hold for her own protection, but an excellent researcher none-the-less when s/he says;

“… the ‘Court’ situation shouldn’t really be about ‘High Court’ v ‘Family Court’ – but more importantly the case was heard in SECRET. No members of the public were allowed into the ‘Fact Finding Hearing’. Not even the children’s grandparents were allowed, neither were the McKenzie friends. THAT’S the important issue here. Just because Pauffley made her judgement public (which by the way is I think unprecedented), makes the whole thing even more suspect. This case should have been in CRIMINAL court. not SECRET family court. That’s the issue as far as I am concerned. And the reason they didn’t arrest Abe (who was purported to be a child abusing, wasting police time, torturing children etc.) – the reason that Abe WASN’T arrested (Abe was outside the RCJ when the fact finding was going on), is because then the police would have had to expose ALL the videos, ALL the allegations, ALL the evidence IN A PUBLIC COURT OF LAW. And that’s why the case so speedily rushed to SECRET FAMILY COURT. See what I mean? The police and Pauffley knew that the evidence could be covered up in a family court – but it couldn’t be covered up in a criminal court. Listen to the police interview of RD. Officer Savage couldn’t WAIT to keep saying ‘this needs to go to family court’.”

Here is an EXCELLENT in-dept analysis by “Truth1” of Ella’s daughter in her police interivews.  This article is a MUST-READ!

Here is another DearmanDoesHampstead post, written today, “Dearman-Pornographer?”


This week, I will be hosting some guest writers, respected fellow researchers showcasing their online abuse by the accused.  I will attempt to put together their abuse campaigns in order to show there is a pattern to the Hoaxtead Res team in order to intimidate, harass and attempt to arrest anyone who speaks out against them.  Keep checking back!


Here is a list of domains hosted by an IP address (not shown) known to be attributed to Mr. Dearman.  We can verify that most of these, if not all, do in fact belong to him.












dp10mwlcs (Mass Weight Loss Control System, same as above)


















Here is a video, with comments beneath it, regarding this same topic;

“CCCP 17; Dearman-Pornographer?”

Here’s an excellent comment by ITGuy about Dearman’s IP’s from the video linked above; Comment from “CCCP17; Dearman-Pornographer?”


Text with links of this comment;

“Dear V_A_H, Unlike you I am an IT Expert. We know has the Same IP as The site was recently deleted but you can see remnants here. The IP address: If you do the same thing for It has the same IP address If you just type the IP address into your browser you get This means there is a primary domain set up on that IP called at bluehost This is a both a static and dedicated IP address (only one person owns it) Bluehost provides a dedicated IP to ranges in the to range there are no shared IP’s in this range. If it was a shared IP like Bluehosts shared range you would get no website configured error example will give this error Bluehost IP addresses in the ranges to are shared IP addresses. These are owned by more than 1 person. A single person owns and we can prove who that is. Example sites that also owned by Ricky that are on etc NHS_LABS.COM is under a hidden registration (Domain owner is a proxy). but if you search hard you will find Ricky did create it!about-us Another proof there just happens to be a directory called rickydearman and all his other sites off that IP are Ricky Dearmans sites This is a dedicated IP and I have proven this. Now we have proven you do not know what you are talking about please do not try to speculate that is not a DNS server. This backup DNS server was activated by adding this server to your DNS configuration on your computer. The reason there was a list of sites that did not work was because these were names associated with this DNS server so they could not be resolved as it is no longer available as Ricky had taken. There are breadcrumbs of this all over the net and the configuration files at this address also still show the names and IPs servers.”
And another comment made by ITGuy
“Hi Stophoax You said “The trick Is that Ricky he is a computer illiterate”. I am not sure I agree. Ricky Dearman says he is an expert in computers so I am not sure how you could say he is not. Based on his skills it appears he does know how to build a website and would know if people were using his server for hosting a Pornagraphic DNS This Ricky Dearman who is notes he is an expert in internet marketing and highlights his skills on his resume And boasts about on his “Other Twitter Feed” Not the twitter feed he uses for following pornography He also professes to be a Computer Network Professional Does Voice overs on how to use a computer and edit digital media And even runs his own Internet Digital Media advertising company “


Also, I offer up’s,DEARMAN’S POLICE INTERVIEW ANALYSIS 15.09.14.” /where from page 21 Dearman begins speaking ABOUT INTERNET MARKETING and the PORNOGRAPHIC INDUSTRY, mentioning the words “INTERNET PORN”, “PORN INDUSTRY” and “ADULT SITES” no less than 7 times in an interview where he is being questioned about sodomising his children !!??

page 21:Dearman mentions the term “PORN INDUSTRY”

page 22: he mentions the words “PORN SITES”, “PORN INDUSTRY”

page 23: “PORN” and “PORN SITES”

page 24: “ADULT SITE”

page 25: “PORN”

Dearman continues to make references to PORNGRAPHIC ADULT SITES throughout the interview.

I think we can safely say that there is a rather LARGE possibility that Mr. Dearman would have the connections, know-how and the ability to make, market and sell pornography.





Left-Hand Path Connections (updated)

It’s easy for Mr. Dearman to say he is innocent of raping his children, torturing, killing & eating the flesh and drinking the blood of infants.  Unfortunately for Mr. Dearman he surrounds himself and associates with people who walk the left-hand path therefore simply by association, he is subliminally telling us that he also walks this dark path.

If one is accused of paedophilia, you don’t associate with paedophiles and then claim you’re not a paedophile.  If one is accused of theft, you don’t purposely surround yourself with thieves and expect people to believe you are not a thief.  Mr. Dearman is being accused of practicing Satanic Ritual Abuse and he surrounds himself with satanists expecting us to believe he, himself, is not a satanist.  Sorry Mr. Dearman, we don’t believe you.  Here are some of his associations;

First up is profile “MK Ultra 666”

Here is a previously written post on MK Ultra666


I do not believe Mr. Dearman runs the MK Ultra 666 profile but I have an idea of whom it may be.   Nonetheless, here is MK Ultra 666’s video list of the last 10 months since the profile was created (joined 6 April, 2015)


EVERY. SINGLE. VIDEO. Is about the Hampstead case, claiming it’s a hoax.  Filled with death threats, horrific images, satanic symbolism, innuendos, calling the mother a bad mum for reporting her children’s abuse to the police and much more.  Take a look for yourself.  Is this really the best approach to prove one’s innocence?  By endorsing nasty, horrific videos?  To prove you don’t make and sell nasty, horrific videos?!?!  What kind of dimwit DOES that?  Ffs…



A fantastic comment; Bravo!


Next up is a profile called “Satanic Views” with a WordPress website of the same name; which, apparently, has been put on hold for a year as of Dec. 2015.  


Why has this blog been put on hold?  Perhaps Mr. Dearman is taking up so much of the authors time campaigning against the children that the author hasn’t enough time for his own blog .  Has Mr. Dearman employed this author, a self-professed satanist, to help Mr. Dearman prove his “innocence” by running a social media campaign for him?  Before the author put his blog on a one year hold, he wrote a post;


“El Coyote” re-blogged this post on his “Hoaxtead Research” crap site;


Satanic Views is indeed a frequent commenter on “HoaxRes”, here is one of his comments from that crap site, inviting more satanists to the campaign.  Here he also mentions “witchfinders”. Let’s be REAL clear here, we are not hunting witches, foolish imp.  We are after a massive paedophile ring that sexually abuses, tortures and eats babies.  If that is what you are happy to defend then so be it.  We are not living in a fairy tale or the Wizard of Oz, we are not hunting witches.  We demand justice, to right the wrongs perpetrated upon our children.  We are mothers, fathers, grandparents, aunts, uncles of children who see a growing trend in CSA in our communities.  If we don’t speak up, you will think it is alright to abuse our children, kidnap them and torture them.  Those dark thoughts drive us to action to stop abuse parties, ritual abuse, trauma-based mind-control whatever the hell you want to call destroying young, innocent lives.


Yes, SV, great plan bring in MORE satanists!!! Lol, really?!?!  That’ll show us wicked ‘witch-finders’/’satan-hunters’….Here’s Satanicviews on Facebook;




On Facebook, Mr. Hind writes;


WOW-How do you KNOW Ms. Draper will never see her kids again James?  Do you have inside knowledge?  Is Mr. Dearman giving you information? Do you work for Mr. Dearman, James?  You really shouldn’t have given up your day job for this loser, what you were doing before was much more intelligent and less evil, but that’s your conscience that you will have to live with for the rest of your life.  Here it is in black & white for all to see. Here is Mr. Hind on Twitter, warning, graphic content;




Here’s Mr. Hind as Jay Vendoza on Disqus with the same devil logo as on facebook;


Here’s a new comment I found on Rupert Q’s “Discussion” section;


*Update* Since this post was published, Mr. Hind has changed his profile.   We’ve obviously had an affect on James Hind and his controllers.  It now looks like this;


Jay set up a new Twitter page called “List 616” to monitor and follow fellow researchers. This Twitter page links to “MySatan” a WordPress blog where his little list names people to be watched.


Well, as it turns out, Satanicviews/Jay Vendoza/James Hind were all sock accounts of a person by the name of Julian Vayne (See THIS POST for the connection)


Julian is a member of the Illuminates Of Thanateros, a death & sex cult.  Here he is announced as giving a talk at the Pagan Federation International conference in the Netherlands last April.


So, while Julian’s interests include drugs & magic, he also goes around to schools giving talks about the history of sex to children, here he is talking to an “infant school” about the history of sex…indeed, INFANTS!  SEX.  And it’s HISTORY…cough, cough…umm does anyone have a problem with that other than me???



This was just last year, 18 Nov. 2015

The link above “Sex and History” says;

The University of Exeter’s Sex and History project is an award-winning and innovative initiative which aims to empower people of all ages – and especially young people – to talk more openly about the issues that really matter to them by using objects from past cultures as a stimulus for discussing issues relating to sex, sexuality and relationships. 

Our pioneering methodology harnesses the powerful effect of learning about what people from across time and place have thought about desire, arousal, intimacy, gender, body image, beauty, power and control.

Exploring different cultural attitudes takes us outside ourselves and our everyday concerns, brings fresh eyes to our own ideas and quite simply shows that sex is nothing new and it’s OK to talk about it.

Intriguing images from history provide an arresting focus for discussions, affording a safe distance from sensitive subjects and allowing us to bring in as little or as much about our feelings and experiences as we feel comfortable with.

One of the project pages;


The “Lust in Translation” link from above is a project partner and says this on it’s website;

“Promiscuity, dating tips, how to find a husband, what red shoes really mean, infections, being sexually exploited, ugly rich guys getting beautiful girls, cars as symbols of virility, how to pull on Plymouth Hoe, the importance of kissing, the madness of being in love, loneliness, risk-taking, how to get someone to fancy you…

From November 2010 to April 2011, Effervescent artists spent a total of one hundred days in the company of thirty-five young people aged 16 – 25, twenty-six older people aged 50 – 87, five adult volunteers, three museum professionals, and seven youth workers from Plymouth, with only one thing on our minds: sex.

Provoking challenging and giggly inter-generational dialogue mediated with calming cups of tea; initiating inflammatory ideas-generating activities such as dressing-up games, photographic assignments, choreographic tasks and biggest-poser competitions; as well as exploring objects and documents from the Plymouth City Museum and Art Gallery, Plymouth and West Devon Record Office and the Wellcome Trust’s collection of erotica, we asked ourselves:

  • What questions about contemporary society and ourselves do these objects provoke?
  • What do we want to say about sex right now?
  • Who do we want to say it to?
  • What are the most effective narrative, filmic, aural and visual ideas we can use to translate these ideas into short snappy media treats?

The four films conceived in this pilot project were wholly devised and created by the project participants, and are the results of a collective two thousand hours of voluntary face-to-face and digital participation. This challenging, stimulating, extraordinary piece of work has made a real difference to people’s lives, connecting people who felt isolated, improving the confidence of people who felt shy, and giving a positive learning experience to people accustomed to being disengaged from or disappointed by formal education”

The site’s “Gallery” has some interesting items and videos.  And Julian Vayne is a part of it all…from the “Sex and History” site, “Awards”


So WHAT IS the Illuminates Of Thanateros (IOT) you ask?  Wikipaedia says:


“Thanateros” is a blend of Thanatos and Eros-Greek gods of DEATH & SEX…and “Illuminates” is used in accordance with the claimed tradition of calling such societies-in which those who have mastered the secrets of magic help bring others to mastership- the “ILLUMINTI”.  FFS…!!!

So here we have a leader of a death and sex cult known for giving talks about drugs and sex to infants at school.  Does that sound like anyone ELSE you might know involved in the Hampstead Cover-Up?  Oh, indeed, Mr. Dearman, who claims it’s a hoax…except his defenders do EXACTLY THE SAME THING.  All the while calling us CRAZY, STUPID and LIARS.  

Other Left Hand Path followers that support Mr. Dearman: From

“Jon Crossland” This profile has been changed to “Lizzy Borden


Mr. Crossland also posts on Google+ (Name changed to “Lizzy Borden”)


Mr. Crossland is a member of several Google+ “communties” including these;


From these communities, Mr. Crossland finds horrific images that he happily reposts (but I will not show them here, if you want to see, go look for yourself but use caution if you are easily triggered) such as this imagethis image, this one and and this image.  Mr. Crossland also posts many of “HoaxR” articles.  He is from Germany but lives in the UK now.

Mr. Crossland is on Facebook;


We know it’s him by his Facebook profile photos;



These individuals are clearly into horrific stuff, this is who we are up against.  I don’t care if you are a satanist, a catholic or a jew-if you hurt and abuse innocent children-you’re filth.  If you defend people like Mr. Dearman with your profiles filled with horror then we clearly can see who you are, as well as Mr. Dearman.

Linking Dearman’s Sock Accounts

As if we needed any more proof that it is indeed Mr. Dearman behind the “hoax” campaign, there is one more link I’d like to show you.  There are others that I am aware of but I am focusing on this link today.  As I have showed you before, I can definitely link Mr. Dearman to his first Youtube account “PleidianReborn”, watch;










In the screen capture below you see 4 separate Youtube profiles: MK Ultra, Edmondo Willy, Snake Logan & UK Callum.  Three of the 4 say exactly the same thing, including the capitalized “LOL” at the end of the sentence.  These are sock accounts of Mr. Dearman.

This is a ‘signature’ style, a repeating acronym that not many people use.  Not capitalized anyway, most would use ‘lol’ or ‘Lol’.  Dearman repeatedly uses ‘LOL’.


NEW TARGETS 23rd July Royal Courts of Justice      YouTube





Snake Logan is El Coyote

If that link gets removed, here is the web archive from the WayBackMachine








Miss “Scarlet Scoop” also is included in this, notice the ‘PleadianReborn’ reference in this email address;







It’s interesting to note that Mr. Dearman finds this so amusing, just one big joke to him. Haha, so funny that you’re being accused of eating babies, raping children while filming it all and selling snuff videos on the internet.



BTW Mr. Dearman, though you say you don’t read this blog, I’d like you to answer my previous question…which one of your children was telling the truth and which one was lying here in this screen capture of their retractions;



Cannabis Cures Cannibalism



Here at Dearman Does Hampstead, we strive to bring the “Hampstead 2” case to light and show the world what is happening to our children, we also care deeply about finding solutions to the cults blood lust. Perhaps they could stop drinking the blood of children, eating their bodies and stop craving the Adrenochrome found in the blood of terrified babies and young children.  Here is an excellent paper written by Abram Hoffman, titled, “The Adrenochrome Hypothesis and Psychiatry” in 1954.

We feel Mr. Christie is correct in his research regarding fresh, raw cannabis juice and “weed” like to thank him for inspiring us to do further research on the subject.

This research is for the abused children as they grow up and are taught to kill, like child “P” and child “Q” who were coerced into murder, mayhem and cannibalism.  This research is for all to heal and become whole again…

We would like the ritually abused survivors to have resources available to them as they grow into adulthood, that cannibalism is NOT healthy for you nor for the poor, eaten human being.  We will attempt to initiate dialog among the scientific community, in our best interest of well-being.  We want to protect our young from your young, -naturally you from ours, therefore we MUST come to terms with solutions, not band-aid troll campaigns online.  THIS IS BULLSHIT!

Obviously there haven’t been studies to prove this point, that cannabis can cure cannibalism, not that we are aware of.  However there are incredible amounts of data on the health benefits of cannabis.  Much more research will be forthcoming as different governments throughout the world legalize m for medical research.  What we DO know is that consuming human blood, well, that’s just messed up.  Especially if you drink someone’s blood that was just vaccinated, all those nasty little live viruses swimming around.

And what about” Kuru“. are you not worried about “the disease that is the result of the practice of ritualistic cannibalism among the Fore (inhabitants of the highlands of New Guinea), in which relatives prepared and consumed the tissues (including brain) of deceased family members. Brain tissue from individuals with kuru was highly infectious, and the disease was transmitted either through eating or by contact with open sores or wounds.

Kuru belongs to a class of infectious diseases called transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs), also known as prion diseases. The hallmark of a TSE disease is misshapen protein molecules that clump together and accumulate in brain tissue. Scientists believe that misshapen prion proteins have the ability to change their shape and cause other proteins of the same type to also change shape.”  Way to go!

But look!  You have a way to heal your “misshapen prion proteins” with cannabis, here is “Nonpsychoactive Cannabidiol Prevents Prion Accumulation and Protects Neurons against Prion Toxicity” which states;

“Prion diseases are transmissible neurodegenerative disorders characterized by the accumulation in the CNS of the protease-resistant prion protein (PrPres), a structurally misfolded isoform of its physiological counterpart PrPsen. Both neuropathogenesis and prion infectivity are related to PrPres formation. Here, we report that the nonpsychoactive cannabis constituent cannabidiol (CBD) inhibited PrPres accumulation in both mouse and sheep scrapie-infected cells, whereas other structurally related cannabinoid analogs were either weak inhibitors or noninhibitory. Moreover, after intraperitoneal infection with murine scrapie, peripheral injection of CBD limited cerebral accumulation of PrPres and significantly increased the survival time of infected mice. Mechanistically, CBD did not appear to inhibit PrPres accumulation via direct interactions with PrP, destabilization of PrPres aggregates, or alteration of the expression level or subcellular localization of PrPsen. However, CBD did inhibit the neurotoxic effects of PrPres and affected PrPres-induced microglial cell migration in a concentration-dependent manner. Our results suggest that CBD may protect neurons against the multiple molecular and cellular factors involved in the different steps of the neurodegenerative process, which takes place during prion infection. When combined with its ability to target the brain and its lack of toxic side effects, CBD may represent a promising new anti-prion drug.”



Juicing raw, fresh Cannabis & hemp on the other hand is extremely healthful. In CANNABIS JUICING: THE REALITY OF WHOLE PLANT THERAPY G. Rabinsky says,

“Juicing vegetables is nothing new for health-conscious consumers seeking to gain the benefits of phytonutrients and vitamins. Some patients, however, have gained significant benefit from juicing the fan leaves and flowers of raw, undried cannabis.

This is obviously a very different approach than traditional smoking or vaporizing, both of which employ heat to cause chemical changes in the cannabinoids found in the plant. Cannabinoids are stored in the plant in the form of acids and denoted as THC-A, CBD-A, CBG-A, etc. It is only during the application of heat (a process called decarboxylation) that these acids are converted to the cannabinoids with which many cannabis consumers are familiar: THC, CBD, CBG, etc.

When juicing raw plant material, no psychoactive THC is consumed because the molecule simply is not present in the plant. Thus, patients who juice experience no euphoria.”



Our bodies are hard-wired with endo-cannabinoid receptors G. Rabinsky writes,

“Cannabinoids from marijuana, called phytocannabinoids, simply imitate endocannabinoids, plugging into the same receptors in the brain and throughout the nervous and immune systems. Other herbs, like echinacea, also contain non-psychoactive cannabinoids that may play a healing role in the human body (especially in concert with other cannabinoids and terpenes).”

Watch this quick 14 min. documentary about Dr. William Courtney and Kristen Courtney of Cannabis International; along with the people involved in researching, promoting, regulating and benefiting from raw cannabis. Titled “Leaf” and here is their website, “Cannabis International” with many brilliant links to studies and research papers


Description: “Leaf”; “Dr. Courtney is a physician and researcher from Mendocino, California, who gives medical marijuana approvals to qualified patients in Mendocino and Humboldt Counties. Kristen Peskuski is a researcher and patient who put her systemic lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, interstitial cystitis, and numerous other conditions into remission juicing fresh cannabis.

They help make sense of the science behind patient’s recoveries from a diverse range of medical conditions. Attorneys, physicians, law enforcement, medical care providers, patients and their families discuss their experiences with medical cannabis. They specifically focus on juicing fresh cannabis, which is non-psychoactive and contains medical properties 200-400 times stronger than traditional, heated cannabis.

Patients have reported success with osteo and rheumatoid arthritis, autoimmune disorders, cancer and many other conditions using this unique therapy.”


“Cannabis Time Capsule” The column describes the African explorer Hermann Wissmann, who served under King Leopold II of Belgium.

The monarch was trying to establish his own kingdom in Africa in what we now know as the Democratic Republic of Congo, and the piece talks about how Wissmann apparently watched as the “Lubuku” people went from being savage cannibals to peaceful hippies who wouldn’t even kill an animal after smoking “riambo”, or as the natives called it, “bashilange.” You guessed it: They were getting high.

You may scoff at this concept, just as we, non-cannibalistic types, scoff at the thought of you consuming our children.  Wouldn’t it be easier to legalize cannabis for everyone to grow and use rather than trying to normalize &legalize paedophilia, necrophilia and cannibalism?  You and your government lackeys are trying to legalize and normalize the later, seems it would just be better for the entire planet to legalize the cultivation and use of cannabis and hemp.

Not only easier but much more profitable than the sale of human organs, human trafficking, sales of weapons for your wars, having to hire lawyer after lawyer to cover up your murderous ways.  Everything you can make with plastic can be made with hemp/cannabis plant cultivation.


HEMP SEED: THE MOST NUTRITIONALLY COMPLETE FOOD SOURCE IN THE WORLD  says, “Seeds of the plant cannabis sativa, hemp seed, contain all the essential amino acids and essential fatty acids necessary to maintain healthy human life. No other single plant source has the essential amino acids in such an easily digestible form, nor has the essential fatty acids in as perfect a ratio to meet human nutritional needs.

The importance of hemp seed nutrients to human health cannot be fully appreciated without some understanding of bio-chemistry in life. Unfortunately, any attempt to understand the flow of life leads into the realm of the most troublesome of the three infinities — the infinitely complex.

Some deep thinkers believe life is a paradox not to be understood but experienced to the fullest. However, the Sages have said, “Know thyself.” At any rate it is paradoxic to attempt simplifying the infinite complexity of flowing life. Yet, it is far better for the health and development of any thinking and feeling, uniquely individual human being, to pursue knowledge than to lounge in ignorance.”


Raw Cannabis Juice for Trauma-Based Mind Control

“Cannabis is the plant that can delete mind control.”  Ella Draper in this fantastic interview on  Jeranism ““Hampstead Cover-Up: An interview with Ella & Abraham” on 19/1/16

“Hampstead Cover-Up & State Sponsored Trauma Based Mind Control”   Follow this link for the World Beyond Belief show notes (see episode 173, extensive notes on TBMC scroll down a bit)

RSA survivor Cathy O’Brian on “Cannabis stops the mind control” states categorically, “The effects of marijuana on the brain are not conducive to mind control…it screws up the programming.”

The book titled “The Illuminati Formula to Create an Undetectable Total Mind Control Slave” by By Fritz Springmeier lists cannabis in chapter 3 as; “Cannabis -(aka Marijuana, a sedative, change in perception, colors and sounds more distinct, time distorted. This drug is not used much in Monarch Programming because it IMPEDES mind control. It has been experimented with in combination with other drugs as an interrogation tool. The CIA listed it as being used in MK-Ultra, but it served as an experimental drug rather (than) for programming.)” However, this list has another 200 drugs that CAN be used for different programming techniques.

The Power of Raw Cannabis Cannabis is a vegetable, it is a dietary essential.  It can prevent as well as cure many diseases when the raw fan leaves and flowers are juiced.  “The most convincing reason for ingesting cannabis as a juice is being able to take in more cannabinoids than you usually would. Without the high, these acidic compounds can be ingested in large doses without having an impact on your daily activities.

THCA and CBDA are believed to act as anti-oxidants, anti-inflammatories and neuroprotectants, much like their non-acidic counterparts.

These therapeutic properties are what make cannabis – raw or heated – so useful as a long-term treatment for many chronic diseases. In fact, Dr. Courtney emphasizes the daily intake of raw cannabis as both a preventative medicine and dietary supplement.”



“There will be, in the next generation or so, a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude, and producing dictatorship without tears, so to speak, producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies, so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them, but will rather enjoy it, because they will be distracted from any desire to rebel by propaganda or brainwashing, or brainwashing enhanced by pharmacological methods. And this seems to be the final revolution.”

Aldous Huxley, Tavistock Group, California Medical School, 1961

Ella & Abraham’s website has more information.

CannabisCuresCancers, page owner Kane Slater has produced over 90 articles and interview transcriptions on the “Hampstead 2” and has published them on his page which has over 97,000 followers.  This is how we do it, the cat is out of the bag. #CannabisCuresCancers #CannabisCuresCannibalism

Here’s how to juice the raw leaves & buds Juicing Fresh Raw Marijuana












Our FaceBook Page

Here at DDH, we try not to be too reactive to the blogosphere surrounding

Dearman and his activities, we simply watch and record.

Of course we have our moments like everyone else.

We made a mistake and “El Coyote” from Toadstead Trollers caught it.

But he didn’t have ANYTHING to say about the content of the post, only the mistake.

When we accidentally wrote (but quickly changed within an hour of posting the piece)

that Drif Loud was (Abe).  We don’t know for a fact that is true or not.  Unfortunately,

when we posted to our Facebook page, it posted the mistake still intact, unnoticed.

Our main focus has always been RD and we watch his online workings,

for the most part, exclusively.  It’s all we have time for.

An email of apology has been sent to Mr. Christie for our mistake and it was sincere.

 We feel a public apology is also a good thing, so we’d like to offer up

our heart-felt apologies for any and all problems that may arise from this mistake.


At the same time, we would like to comment on something we saw on Twatter,

erm, Twitter by “Helen Does Hampstead”, a typical sock puppet account on YT & Twatter.


Our Facebook page began the last week of October, 2015 so that is only

3 months ago.  Not “nearly a year” ago.

Let’s be clear here…

This web-site is for recording your mistakes Mr. Dearman,

NOT for popularity.  We don’t care how many people read this or

our Facebook page, it is not meant for public consumption.  It is meant

for your cult superiors to see what a BAFFOON you are and for Ella & Abraham’s

legal team to show your character, ie; Greg Queen of Everything, Joker, etc.

Therefore, it is not in our best interests to show you who we are YET.

We’re not done exposing you.  When we are, you will know us.

This isn’t about who the author of DDH is,

This is about you trying to cover up the

accusations of your children’s abuse.

Just know it is NOT Kristen nor Helen.

But here’s a hint, we did communicate on


 Ahhh, so you’re getting closer, finally!!!

For a guy who lives in his mom’s basement with no job, in Sheffield

It’s surprising it’s taking you so long,


Two New Blogs On The Hampstead Case!

UPDATE: Ella & Abraham’s website is back!

As our movement says “good-bye” to some players,

We here at DDH are happy to introduce two new blogs to the scene.

The first comes from Facebook where the creator & manager of

CannabisCuresCancers, which has more than 96,000 followers (likes)

has tirelessly transcribed many of the video

testimonies of the Hampstead children.

Here is one album of 9 photos, each photo can be clicked on,

commented on and most importantly, SHARED!

It is IMPERITIVE that word gets out.

Another album by the same person can be found here and has

36 click-able, comment-able and share-able photos, each with different

portions of the children’s testimonies.

If you’re on Facebook, you need to check this out!



The second new blog is “Hampstead Transcripts”

We haven’t had time to look through the entire site yet,

but it looks promising.  Full transcripts of all video testimonies.

Clean-cut, easily share-able and has a comment section under

each transcription.  Comment section should be fun, watch for

Dearman sock accounts and take screen shots when possible!

Good luck to both sites!


Some New YouTube Profiles

We had to chuckle when we first saw this,

even though this is NO LAUGHING MATTER.

Perhaps Mr. Dearman created this first profile for us because

we always seem to catch him correcting other peoples comments

poor spelling and grammar are one of his pet peeves, he knows it,

and we know it too!  Even though he is known to make many mistakes

himself, he falters all over himself when this happens.

Mr. Dearman, no one is perfect even though we all try.

None the less here is

Your Personal Spellchecker & Grammar Adviser


“This channel has no content”


Barnet Baby Muncher


“Helen Does Hampstead”


“David Shurter Fan”


“Angry Dave”


“Angry Dave” on Google+




In the first box you will see, but try not to read, a satanic chant

calling Lucifer to Earth



In the second box (rectangular) is the

Lord’s Prayer backwards, invoking Lucifer

from the Black Goat Cabal


Mr. Dearman has posted this before.




Of course we will also add that the original troll account held by

Mr. Dearman began with “Pleiadian Reborn” Oct. 2014

was later changed to “UK Gollum”,

then changed to “UK Callum”

followed by “Sound Affects” and now “Spiny Norman”

with the original web-address of Pleiadian Reborn


So now that we have your attention


We’d like to ask you a question;

which of your two children are telling the truth here?


(From official transcript ordered by Justice Munby at Family court hearing


Emphasis added)

Why don’t their third police ABE testimonies match?

Do you know Mr, Hollings, Rick?

He’s the one in the pink shirt, third from left.



This was found on Drif Loud’s Twitter Account

“Police ALREADY HAD  child rapists/murders

Dearman & All teachers’ address



Police invite rape & murder suspects from school 

to strategy meeting

3 days after crimes reported



the incriminating genital “distinguishing marks”

& “tattoos” recordings


“More corrupt clumsiness from Rogers the Dodger, Hampstead Cover-Up BODGER”


Police ignore Ricky Dearman raping/forcing cocaine on (child G)

& focus on Ella’s CRIMINAL vegan diet


No entry in police report 11.9.14 – day police interviewed Ella, Child A & Child G & snatched children


More of the botched police cover-up – from their own CRIMINAL report:

faking dates of involvement


Arthur K’s analysis of police CRIS report on “investigation”,

has completely exposed their cover-up


The Children’s video testimony on Vimeo

Link to comment


DS Speer in Court, 20.2.15 He acted IMMEDIATELY he got complaints from child-raping teachers/parents


Medical report, 22.9.14: Child G & Child A tell (foster)carer

about abuse from dad, “his friends” & Mr Hollings


“FACT: Anna Pauffley is a LIAR, and a CRIMINAL, is not fit to serve and should be prosecuted.”


FACT: Anna Pauffley has clearly committed SLANDER and FRAUD and should be prosecuted.



A FEW of the deranged child-rapists/torturers/murderers

busy in Hampstead schools.



2015-Year Of The Troll

Where does one even begin?

We each have our different stories of where we were when

we first heard the children speaking of horrific abuse.

Most reacted in similar ways, we all wanted to know more so we

could help change the situation.  We all want to save

the children, to help them, to comfort them and also

to stand with Ella in her quest to help her children escape

the cold grip of the cult.

We listened to the interviews, we heard mum’s voice,

we heard a mans voice asking questions and we all wanted

to know….MORE.

We researched, we found names and addresses of the perpetrators

as Veteran’s Today posted a list that was from

Anonymous #OpDeathEaters.

Some people created videos, some created blogs,

groups were formed,  interviews were held,

we exchanged information.

We went into full over-drive.

So did our opposition, the cult.

We have been thrown so many hurdles, sometimes it’s

impossible to know which way is up.

Each time we dealt with the trolls the fear

would creep in or the anger would flair up.

We have all spent many sleepless nights worrying,

praying to be shown the path, to find the right answer,

to find the perfect solution,

wondering how to encourage Ella and Abraham

and give them hope that the larger

public will not stand for such injustices to families.


The disinformation abounds and if you weren’t here

from the beginning of this story you can’t POSSIBLY

know the minute details specific to this case, therefore

you are not qualified to judge any supporter involved in this.

Our first hurdle was Christine Ann Sands, she showed up

one Sunday morning at Christ Church in Hampstead.

Yelling monotonously the web address of her blog in her

embarrassingly much-to-much-‘merican accent,

annoying neighbors and fellow protesters alike.

She was later found to have many youtube video warnings

that she was American intelligence.  She was sent in to

disrupt, divide and confuse.

Many believed her and fought for her, it was interesting to watch

as sides were taken.  She took the position that the children would be

better off without either parent and stay in foster care or adopted,

where most likely they would be separated and again abused.

But we kept researching and sharing our

findings, making youtube videos, writing letters, blogging and

worrying….always worring.

“What the HELL can I do?”

“What will happen if I DON’T do anything?”

“What will happen to me if I DO help?”

“Is this other person genuine or not?”

“Is this in the children’s best interest?”

So many questions, requiring answers

that don’t always come easily.

UK Gollum produced videos telling us this was over,

this was a hoax, laughed at Christine and used her against us

claiming how crazy we all looked just as the judgement presented us.

Evil & Foolish we were.

For wanting to help abused children.

For Fecks Sake!

MK Ultra 666 produced threatening, vile videos replete with

Tavistock mind control triggers where we began to notice

the comments and the myriad of sock puppet accounts.

This is where we first saw the patterns.

The Youtube accounts were always recently created,

the writing patterns emerged, the language was abusive,

the circles of people always contained the same accounts.

We saw the Sound Affects youtube account call the children


Facebook groups popped up, pages appeared but few found the

courage to “like” or join the groups for fear of cult retaliation.

We found ourselves requiring secret groups to confer and converse

openly without disruptions.

THIS is where we made our greatest progress by far and wide.

BUT the TROLLS….always the trolls.

One of those was Sheva Burton the lurker

until one day she gave up her position that the children would be better

off without either parent and stay in foster care or adopted,

where most likely they would be separated and again abused.

Oh, and we were all crazy…


Some of us are professionals, some of us are concerned citizens,

some of us are parents, some of us are survivors of  child sexual abuse

some of us are young, old, sane, insane, right or wrong .

We showed up every spare minute of our busy lives to care about children

we heard speaking of horrific things children shouldn’t even know about

let alone practice.  Because we are angry when we can’t protect every child

from these demons we know exist amongst us.

 We know there is a group of people world wide,

regardless of boarders, trafficking children for sex slaves,

making money by creating content to sell to their elite paedophile friends

on the dark web and drinking the adrenochrome-filled blood

of terrified infants.

But we’re the crazy ones….

Never mind that it’s in the news almost EVERY. SINGLE. DAY.

Our personal favorite type of troll is the

elitist ritual survivor  group disruptors.

You know the type, knows EVERYTHING

about the cult, born & raised by the cult but is no longer IN the cult

but still ALIVE…

Welcome to 2016

Let’s Make It Count

2 Brilliant Comments on Youtube by Ella Draper’s Account

We recently spotted these two comments

and wanted to blog them as well as expand on them.

Thank you Ella & Abraham!

Comments were made on a Guidance 2222 video titled,

Hampstead WhistleBlowers-

Fear Is The Mind Killer



State sponsored MIND CONTROL.

Ritual Satanic/sexual abuse and Talmudic Blood Sacrifice meet Monarch Trauma based mind control.

In 2011 at the final hearing of care proceedings Dearman relinquished ALL contact with the children. He had pre-planned to travel to Hollywood Los Angeles ostensibly to revive his failing acting ambitions, so contact with the children would have been impossible. He attempted to contact the children during the Christmas period of 2011 but this was problematic due to him being in the U.S..

L.A. being a notorious hotbed of these MK/Monarch Trauma based mind control TBMC techniques developed by Nazi paper clip scientists, the C.I.A. and other Intelligence agencies from 1947.

It is during this trip that it is believed he became versed in MK Ultra Monarch, Trauma Based Mind Control Techniques. (Also termed (to confuse) Ritual Satanic Abuse) that includes sexual trauma, psychological, and physical pain inflicted on young and even unborn, children. Trauma Based Mind Control is used to create Dissociative Identity Disorder (D.I.D) to remove/detach subjects from families and the rest of the world to create literal slaves/robots that are obedient to their programmer/handler. Most docs destroyed . This one from 1954 surfaced.

Mind controlled sex slave U.S. President Barack Obama programmed at Jakarta International School, which came to prominence in 2012 when Canadian Teacher Neil Bantleman was accused, then later convicted and sentenced to 10 years imprisonment for crimes eerily similar to the testimonies of Alisa and Gabriel.

Jakarta, Similarities with Hampstead case

 1. Children claim they were taken from classrooms and sodomized by groups of adults.

2. The school initially rubbished the children’s claims

3. Medical examinations corroborated the children’s claims.

4. The children claim that they were anesthetized.

5. The children testified that they were raped in secret underground rooms, which have since been demolished or refurbished.

6. Mothers accused of coaching her child/children.

7. “Gang-stalking” by government agents reported in both cases.

8. Use of illusion and virtual reality to confuse and create non-credible disclosure [8. Ellen P. Lacter, Ph.D., Kinds of Torture Endured in Ritual Abuse and Trauma-Based Mind Control]

Bantleman was recently released from jail on appeal after serving less than one year of his 10 year sentence.

According to Alisa and Gabriel, on his return to the U.K. in early 2013 their biological father Ricky Dearman was introduced by C. Wilmer to teacher L. Hollings and others of Christ Church School who were already sexually abusing children in Jesuit Satanic sadistic & Talmudic Blood sacrifice sexual rituals .

These practices of ‘Blood sacrifice’ have been practiced by Talmudic Jewish adherents to certain corrupted Rabbinical doctrines for millennia, however these abominations are not exclusive to Talmudic Jews. Due to the advent of the internet a plethora of evidence is available to show that some “Christian”, most notably certain Jesuit orders as well as certain “Islamic” sects are committing these most heinous crimes against innocent infants and children.

Ritual Satanic Sexual abuse and Royal Arch Freemasonry meet Monarch Trauma based mind control

Dearman introduced the Monarch Trauma Based Mind Control element to Christ Church School and certain teachers introduced these techniques to other schools in the Hampstead area.


“Hey Tricky Ricky ,Mr.Tickles, TICK TOCK, Pookster, Lucy Mullins, Snake Logan, Post Nein, Constance Waring, Jack Burton, or whoever you think you are today.
You REALLY are famous.
You’ve incriminated so many, where does it end?
Tavistock, CIA ,Monarch Trauma Based Mind Control TBMC which you and your ilk subject victims to, including your own offspring, from one generation to the next.
There is a documented history of state sponsored mind control instigated by ( although not exclusively) the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).
The CIA created in 1947 as a result of the influence of the Tavistock Institute- specifically the CIA’s precursor, the OSS.
Well, the State sponsored MK/Monarch Trauma Based Mind Control gig is up. This bizarre interactive alliance that developed between Satanism and large segments of the intelligence community, Tavistock (the CIA) etc. has been exposed thanks to YOU.
Just how many schools in the U.K. have been infested with this scourge? At least 10 in the Hampstead, Camden area.
Is the Education “Authority” involved ? !! ( Just slipped that one in , quick, lie cry or deny !!??)
The children named 7 of them that they had visited with YOU.
Mind controlled sex slave U.S. Pres.  Barack Obama programmed at Jakarta International School, which came to prominence in 2012 when Canadian Teacher Neil Bantleman was accused, later convicted and sentenced to 10 years imprisonment for crimes eerily similar to the testimonies of Alisa and Gabriel.
Our research leads us to believe that the particular Mind Control Programme in the Hampstead Cover Up is one known as the
See Pauffley’s references to Alice in Wonderland in her
(Just as David Shurter’s book is called “Rabbit Hole”?)
Bantleman was recently released from jail on appeal after serving less than one year of his 10 year sentence.
According to Alisa and Gabriel ; on his return to the U.K., their biological father Ricky Dearman was introduced by C. Wilmer to teacher L. Hollings and other teachers & parents of Christ Church School who were already sexually abusing children in Jesuit Satanic sadistic rituals with elements of, Talmudic Blood sacrifice .
Ritual Blood Sacrifice and Royal Arch Freemasonry meet Monarch Trauma based mind control
They’ll need more than a ‘D’ notice to cover this up.
A DA-Notice (Defence Advisory Notice)—called a Defence Notice (D-Notice) until 1993—is an official request to news editors not to publish or broadcast items on specified subjects for reasons of national security. The system is still in use in the United Kingdom.
State sponsored Trauma Based Mind Control (TBMC).
How else could you have convinced the children to consider killing a mother lovingly devoted to them? AND why else would so many members of U.K establishment LIE, and PERVERT THE COURSE OF JUSTICE thereby incriminating themselves so blatantly & publicly in the ATTEMPTED Hampstead cover up!!?
Why the prevalence of C.IA.,MI5, cointel, Bitches, Witches and snitches , pimps ponces and nonces , shills trolls and moles all over the Hampstead Cover Up?
Why so much obfuscation, muddying of the waters ?
What could be so important ?
Our Website blog has been hit thrice in the last 13 days, and is presently down, since we exposed the Crown and State sponsored TRAUMA BASED MIND CONTROL PROGRAMMING INFESTING THE WESTERN WORLD’S EDUCATIONAL SYSTEMS. .
The Truth is out there.”
Here is  a fantastic index of articles related to
Also see
By Fritz Springmeier & Cisco Wheeler

The Proof Is In The Tattoo!

Ella & Abraham’s web-site is #HampsteadCoverUp


“Barnet police were presented with evidence, including video testimonies, audios, drawings and detailed descriptions of TATTOOS and intimate distinguishing marks on the bodies of the children’s attackers, strongly supporting the children’s allegations, and which is sufficient to pass the burden of proof to the named and intimately identified attackers.”

Transcript from Hampstead Transcripts – “Tattoos’

304 Tattoos (2:18min)

Q = 8 yr old boy
A = Boyfriend of mother

A: Hi again Q.  Sorry to disturb you while you are having your breakfast, but we’d like you to tell us about the tattoos please.

Q: Yes.

A: Can you tell us in your own words.

Q: All the 20 special children have a tattoo exs-pect …

A: Except …

Q: Except for me and myself, no, except for myself and my sister cause my mum isn’t a member of the cult.

A: OK.  Anyone else have tattoos

Q: Yes.  The 20 special children all have tattoos.  And also, all the teachers have tattoos.  Mr  Fornoni  has tattoos all over his arms. And Mr Gordge also got tattoos all over his arms .  And also they have on their pussies, their privates.

A: And?

Q: And also all the teachers have it.  Not all parents.

A: So all the teachers have tattoos on their privates …

Q: Yes.

A: … you say.

Q: Yes

A: And what type of tattoo do they have on their privates …

Q: They all have tattooes …

A: What type of tattoos?

Q: They are devil and monster tattoos

A: On their privates?

Q: Yes.

A: They all have them?

Q: Yes.

A: All of the teachers in Christchurch Primary School have devil tattoos on their private parts?

Q: Yes.  No also monster ones.  Yeah, the devil one is in the middle but there’s monster ones and also they have piercings.

A: OK.  Have  you … are these the tattoos that you’ve drawn pictures of?  You’ve given us pictures of?

Q: No   …

A: You’ve drawn some pictures of tattoos.  Are these the tattoos you are talking about?

Q: Yeah.

A: So anybody else [inaudible] … Do parents have tattoos?

Q: Vanessa, [inaudible] Laura, [inaudible]

A: How many parents have we got? [really bad sound]

Q: All the parents

A: All 400 parents have tattoos.

Q: [Nods]

A: Are you sure?

Q: [inaudible] 399, except my mum.

A: Except your mother, have tattoos on their privates..  Thank you very much.

Again from Hampstead Transcripts- “Distinguishing Marks”

302 Distinguishing Marks (6:31min)

E = Mother
Q = 8 yr old boy
A = Boyfriend of mother

E: Sure, sure

Q: On here.

A: Where’s the birthmark of Mrs Forsdyke?

Q: Here.  Like, there.

A: All there, yes?

Q: Yeah, on her private parts.

A: Anything else there?  Anything else she’s got … anything else you can remember?

Q: Yes.  You’ve got like a little dot here.

A: A dot yeah?  Where?  Show me the little dot.

Q: Here.

A: Show us.

Q:  Here … here [pointing to the top of inner right thigh]

A; [inaudible] … little dot, yeah?

Q: Yeah.

A: Lovely.  Anything else you’d like to tell us?

Q: Yes … and she’s got pierce rings …

A: Pierce rings?

Q: … all over her privates.  And she’s also got a pierce ring on her .. errm .. on her private.  On her lips.

A: Yeah?

Q: Yes.

A: OK.  And what of these does she … [inaudible].

Q: She sticks a willy on my bottom.  She touches my privates.  She kicks my privates.  She rubs until the white things come out.  She rubs it really nice.  She flicks it.  Flicks it really hard and she also, like, do that.

A: What does she do?

Q: Errm … she like pushes it.

A: Who does that?  The Head Mistress?

Q: Yes.  But really, really hard.

A: And what willy does she stick in .. she’s a lady.  She doesn’t have a willy does she?

Q: Yes, she does.  A plastic willy.

A: Oh, she has a plastic willy.

Q: Yes.

A: And how does she attach it to herself?

Q: With a like, rubber band.

A: OK.

Q:  Like a, like a trouser’s band.

A: OK.  Oh,  right, like a belt?

Q: And then, and then, they like.  Do you know the shoes like this?  Sssh ssssh …

A: Oh!  Velcro?

Q: Yes.  Its like this … sssh ssshhh

A: Like a Velcro belt.  Well done.  Anyone else  you can think of you would like to tell us about?  Who have distinguishing marks?

Q: Yes.  Errrm … M … Vanessa she’s got a ..

A: Vanessa.  Now, who is Vanessa?

Q: Vanessa’s Clark’s mum.  Clark is a boy in my class and he is my best, best friend.

A: Right. And what’s his mother’s name?  Vanessa what?

Q: Vanessa Patrick.

A: OK.  Thank you.

Q: Vanessa Fitzpatrick.

A: Fitzpatrick.  OK.  Thank you.  Carry on.  Any marks, disguishing marks about her.

Q: Yeah.  She, err, has a, errrm, birth marks on her boob, on her boobies.

A: Yes.

Q: And she is, also, really hairy.  Her privates are just like really hairy.  Really hairy.

A: OK.  That’s the lady you call Sherpherd’s Bush?

Q: Yes.

A: OK.  Can you tell me more about Vanessa.

Q: She’s got hairy legs.  She got hairy boobies.  She got hairy arms.  And, erm, her hair is really wiggly and blond.

A: OK.

Q: And she’s got white skin.

A: Are there any other distinguishing marks about her?  Apart from her being hairy.

Q: Yes.

A: Other marks on her body?

Q: Yes.  She has, like, errm.  She’s, errm, got a verruca  here. Verruca.

A: A wart?

Q: No.  A verruca.  Verruca.

A: What’s a verruca?

Q: A verruca is what I’ve got here [pointing to the bottom of his right foot]

A: OK.  And she’s got one where?

Q: On here [pointing to the knuckle of the index finger on his right hand]

A: OK.

Q: Between her two bones.

A: Anyone else you would like to tell us about.

Q: Yes.

A: Who else has distinguishing marks.

Q: Yes.  They’re really strange marks.  And, errrm,  Mr Hollings, he has like red dots all over his willy.

A: Really?

Q: Yeah, like, really … little

A: Little red dots all over his willy?

Q: Yes.

A: And who is Mr Hollings?

Q: He’s my sisters teacher when, when I was in year 3, Mr Renay used to be my teacher.  Mr Hollings used to be her teacher but now I’m moving into year 4 and now Mr Hollings is my teacher and, errm, now my sister’s teach is Mr Burnett.

A: Thank you.  And Mr Hollings has what on his private parts?

Q: Red dots.

A: Just on his willy or anywhere else?

Q: Mmmm … yeah, yes a tiny, errrm.  Yes.  On his willy and like a, here.

A: Thank you very much.  Anybody else you’d like to tell us about.

Q: Yes.

A: Who?

Q: Mr Burnett

A: He’s got …

Q: He shaved himself.

A: Yeah?

Q: Yeah, on his willy, yeah.

A: When he shaved himself, what can you see when he’s shaved.  What is there to see?

Q: Willy and also …

A: Yeah, so he doesn’t have any other marks?  No tattoos, nothing?

Q: No.  YES!!!!  He has tattoos.

A: He has a tattoo?

Q: Tattoo and pierce rings.

A: What?  Really?

Q: Yes.  And .. Carly, my best friend, he has a pierce ring on his willy.  At the end of his willy.  Where it wees.

A: Yeah?

Q: Yeah, and also on his like, balls, not on his balls, on his leg.  Down a bit.

A: Really?

Q: Yeah.  Where your balls are.

A: Very good.

Q: And he, errrm,  Mrs Fordyke also squashes my balls and it really hurts.

A: Errrrr …

Q: Yeah.  It hurts me all around here.

A: Can you tell me if any other person has any distinguishing marks please.

Q: Yes.  Miss Unwin.  She got, like, like a, errrm, tiny wart on, like, here [pointing to his groin] like a tiny wart there.

A: I see.

Q: Yeah.

A: OK.  Tiny wart there.

Q: Yeah.

A: And there’s another lady apparently who has a big wart.

Q: Yes.  And there’s another lady who has a wart.  Miss Mardon, she’s the nurse teacher, and she’s, errm,  she got a wart here [pointing to the right side of his neck] and …

A: And where else has she got a wart?

Q: On, errm, privates.  Right on her lips.

A: Right on the lips?

Q: Yes.

A: How big is this wart?  I’ve heard you mention it before.

Q: Its as big as a 5 pence piece because I measured it.

A: You measured it?

Q: Yes.

A: How did you get to measure it?

Q: When, errm, she told me to .. when I asked her to measure it after the sex.

A: After what sex?

Q: After sticking willy in my bottom.  And also after … licking

A: Who stuck a willy up your bottom … after the licking!

Q: Too, yeah.

A: Licking what?  What were you licking?

Q: The privates.  The middles.

A: Whose privates were you licking?

Q: Miss Mardon.  I asked can I measure it and I measured it.

A: And committed sex acts upon you as well.

Q: Yeah.

A: What sex acts did she commit.

Q: She’d stick a willy in my bottom and also sometimes people, errm, stick, errm, balls too, of the willy in my bottom and then when they take it out it  bleeds more than when they stick a willy in.  It bleeds more.

A: OK. Thank you very much.  OK.

Drawing of Vanessa F.

Or as the children called her, “Shepards Bush”

Sporting her “Fancy” dildo hat



V.F. on Pinterest

Headmistress Forsdyke








From Drif Loud on Twitter

Of course the childrens’ testimony/drawings were covered up

by police  and put into “storage”





The children NEVER retracted anything about the

distinguishing marks nor tattoos

Yet this was never investigated

NONE of the abusers have had to show evidence to

prove their innocence/guilt.



DC Martin in Court, 19.2.2015.

Reveals he DID view “distinguishing genital marks/tattoos” videos

even though in Judge Anna Pauffley’s erroneous judgement states,

“It is a curious fact that prior to the launch of these proceedings, no police officer had listened to the audio recording made by Jean Clement Yaohirou or watched the film clips of the children. DI Cannon made inquiries at my request to discover that DC Rogers, the member of his team who received the film clips and the audio recording from Mr Yaohirou, had sent them to a property store in Chingford. The focus would appear to have been upon arranging almost immediate ABE interviews.”







Here are a few of the MANY articles you can find

on the internet about cult activities, membership and practices

in regards to satanic tattoos & tattooing….

Tattoo-The Mark of Blood

“Beware – the tattoo procedure is a fashion of the satanic practice of blood-letting or cutting of ones flesh. Rubbing a little ink or pigment in it doesn’t change the fact – you are cutting your flesh – you are practicing blood-letting.”

Satanic Ritual Abuse-Convictions So Far


Child Murders in Mexico Linked to Satanic Cult


Inside Virginia’s Creepy White-Power Wolf Cult




20 Traits Of Satanic Cult Members

“#2 Tattoo-The tattoo symbol for many satanic cult members is a small pea sized black circle with a circle of black dots surrounding it. Or three sixes, or a circle with three curled tails coming out if it – the circles of each six is overlapped. Cocopelli, the god of fire and mischief, was the first figure made of two series of three sixes. He’s not often drawn that way anymore. These tattoos are usually at the hairline on the back of the neck, but they can be anywhere. A dragon, skull, skeleton, a star, or snake, are popular cult symbols.

These symbols make it easier for cult members to identify each other. Three sixes is the symbol of the Devil in the Book of Revelation, because six has always had meaning to the Satanic church. A five pointed star or the six pointed star was one satanic symbol adopted by the Hebrews during the Exodus. Hiding the sixes, as in the overlapping circle or figures, is popular, since the Devil hides.”

My West Hampstead: Celebrity ink artist Dan Gold on his drunken tattoo from Kate Moss, secret street art and independent shops

“Tattoo artist Dan Gold, 41, has inked almost everyone from Kate Moss to Peaches Geldof at his studio. The father-of-one has lived in Sumatra Road, West Hampstead, for three years but has been making street art and tattooing rock stars for more than two decades.”

IPCC Upholds Ella Draper’s Appeal

This is a very important document and action in her case.

From her website at




Recent News:






We here at DDH sincerely hope that the re-investigation of her case

has shown/will show the true facts and that her children are returned to

her immediately without further delay.

HampsteadCoverUp posted this article Feb. 6, 2016

and if the link no longer works, there is a web-archive here.

Destroying the Crime Scenes?

Ella Draper’s children mention many schools involved

in the crimes they witnessed and were forced to take part in.

Since the testimonies came into the public domain many

of the schools and off-campus locations have had

some level of reconstruction done.

Including Hampstead Christ Church Primary School,

Abacus, Fitzjohns, Hampstead Parochial, Holy Trinity

have all had work done, as well as the Finchley-Lido swimming pool.

McDonald’s closed it’s doors Nov. 2013, before the children gave

testimony but during the same school year.

(Sept.’13/June ’14)