Ella Gareeva’s Statement March 8th, 2017

Hampstead Cover Up to Pizzagate. Mother’s statement and appeal to the public.

 

 

It’s great to see Ella and have an update, thanks Ella!

#IStandWithElla

I #BelieveTheChildren

Transcription of Ella’s statement~

Ella; “Hi, my name is Ella Gareeva, and I am the mother of two children from Hampstead, Alisa & Gabriel, who have been unlawfully removed from me 11/9/2014.
This is a high profile case, and you can find the details on our websites HampsteadCoverUp.com and FreeTheHampstead2.com  You will find the links on the bottom of this page.
 
The Hampstead case is a criminal case which has been blatantly and shamelessly covered up by the British authorities and we have more than enough documented evidence to prove it.
The judgement of notorious High Court Judge Anna Pauffley was fraudulent and in breech of several articles of human rights. She unlawfully assumed the duties of a criminal judge and jury within a secret family court in a case concerning sadistic, satanic ritual abuse of children and the trafficking, torture and serial killing of countless innocent infants. A case which was never a matter for the family court.
Pauffley, further abuse of power by criminally perverting the course of justice throughout the fact-finding or fact-hiding hearing. The crucial evidence, a two and a half hour recording made by the Special Constable, Jean-Clement Yahirou, was hidden away on the second day of the investigation. Pauffley acknowledged this fact of concealment yet failed to order a re-investigation. She dismissed and ridiculed the medical findings of a respected medical specialist in child sexual abuse with 26 years of experience that conclusively confirmed the childrens allegations.
My children, Alisa & Gabriel suffered horrendous sadistic physical, emotional, psychological and spiritual abuse in school at the hands of their father Ricky Dearman, head mistress, Kate Forsdyke, Louis Hollings, Nina Marden and the rest of the teachers at the Christchurch school. Social workers, parents and the members of the Metropolitan Police Service.
They were then further abused, damaged and traumatized by the authorities who removed them from the care of a loving mother and family. Alisa and Gabriel were essentially jailed and held incommunicado for all this time since September 2014. My entire family, my parents, my son, their brother, my sister, uncle and aunts all of whom children are very close to, have been denied contact without any court order in place.
Initially, my children were taken away from me on the pretext that I wasn’t capable to protect them from the abuse of school. However, once Gabriel & Alisa was snatched, they were forced to retract and the criminal acts were covered up.
The satanists who have my children, tattoo and pierce the genitalia of the “special” children. I would like to remind everyone that all the children from the so-called “special families”, all the teachers, and a lot of the parents have devil tattoos on their private parts. Many of them have irremovable distinguishing marks such as birthmarks as in the case of head mistress Kate Forsdyke with her port-wine stain all over her thighs and pudenda, Galyna Upson’s birthmarks and Nina Marden’s mole the size of a 5-pence piece.
All this evidence has been forwarded to the police including the children’s drawings of the distinguishing marks. To this day, none of the perpetrators, including the children’s biological father, Ricky Dearman, was arrested and investigated. Not a single mobile or laptop has been seized, apart from Jean-Clements laptop with the children’s testimonies. No CC-tv footage acquired and watched, no property searched.
On the contrary, Kate Forsdyke was invited to the strategy meeting on the 8th & 9th of September, 2014, literally a few days after the first children’s disclosures on the 5th of September, even though she was named as one of the main abusers and a cult ring-leader, way before the forced retractions. In spite of the well-documented cover up, the British authorities remain quiet. We still await the response from the Home Office and other government organizations.
Since May 2015, at the start of campaign to release Alisa & Gabriel, we learned that the key child protection organizations are unwilling, unable to take any actions, therefore are also complicit in crime and the cover up of that crime. For example, the NSPCC are not interested in investigating the horrendous abuse of my children, Alisa & Gabriel, neither are they concerned with securing the safety of other children who are still being sadistically gang-raped, tortured and traumatized. Amongst them, Sophie, Millie, Clark, James, Ella, Annie, Mia, Georgia, Amelia, Max, Calypso and many others. The majority of these children have tattoos and some, pierce rings like Cartney.
(This author has purposefully left out the family names of children mentioned in the video)
For the second time, the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) has ordered the police to re-investigate the case with no avail. All major media outlets were served with a Defense Advisory (DA) Notice. This is a notice sent out in questions of national security. According to DNotice.org.uk the objective of such a notice is to prevent and advert public disclosure of information that would compromise UK military and intelligence operations and methods or put at risk the safety of those involved in such operations or lead to attacks that would damage the critical national infrastructure and/or endanger lives.
Is the Hampstead case associated with military and intelligence operations as in other high profile cases, the Jimmy Saville cover-up, the Franklin cover-up, the McMartin case, Finder’s…our research shows that it is. Which means ALL children in this country are in immediate and present danger.
I only had several contacts with Alisa and Gariel, between September and December 2014. Once my children asked to go home and we discussed writing the letter to the judge, all the contacts were immediately suspended. We don’t know if Alisa & Gabriel are still suffering the torture and abuse. They were kidnapped and held by the same people who subjected them to it. We don’t even know whether they are still alive.
According to the fraudulent, unlawful judgement of the above mentioned judge, all my parental right were removed. The local authority is under no obligation to notify me of my children’s health, education or well-being. I, myself, have had to leave the UK in order to protect my life and freedom. I was essentially framed for arrest and prevented from participation in any trial.
When a government agent, Sabine McNeill, published confidential court material on-line, behind my back and without my consent. On the 12th of February, 2015 ten policemen including two person’s with medical kits showed up at my door step threatening to force entry. Luckily I escaped.
We know that the father of the children, Ricky Dearman, accused of torture, cannibalism and serial murder was given double-time access to the children from the beginning and according to the order from August 2015 was considered to be the main guardian and was supposed to receive the full-custody of Alisa and Gabriel within six to twelve months from that order.
In the Hampstead case, we have witnessed the illegalities of police and local authority actions, ignorance of children’s rights, ignorance to risks of multiple children and the abomination of justice delivered by high court is now supported and endorsed by the BBC.
My children were damaged by authorities, unlawfully removed from my care by those authorities, further abused by those authorities who to this day, hope only to arrest and imprison myself for breaking family court secrecy rules where a thoroughly unlawful judgement which has judged me guilty of crimes I did not commit.
The cover up is blatant and is itself, yet, further evidence which most disturbingly gives insight into just how deeply the criminally insane sadists are embedded in every British authority and to the extent that they have full control of BBC news because surely, the BBC news team are not that stupid to miss all of the points now upheld by the IPCC.
We have come up with alternative ways to make general public aware of the injustice that has been done to the children, of the criminal activity taking place in the schools, in the courts, within the police service, social services, local authorities and the danger to all of the children of the UK . With various strategies in mind and the vast support of the public, we appeal to everyone concerned with such a horrific situation to start acting to put an end to these atrocities happening in our society and support our initiatives to free Alisa and Gabriel and all children held captive against their will.
I would like to take this opportunity to sincerely and whole-heartedly express my deepest gratitude to so many people around the world who are supporting our Alisa and Gabriel. Making and re-posting videos, creating and running websites and blogs, writing to the authorities, disseminating leaflets and spreading the story every way possible.
May God bless you all and keep our children free and safe.
Free The Hampstead 2
Free Alisa & Gabriel and all children from this evil.”
Here, I am going to add the letter from the Independent Police Complaints Commission upholding several of Ella’s complaints regarding how her case was handled.
Please consider donating to Ella Gareeva’s legal aid fund to help her win her children back and thank you for your support by sharing.

Disclaimer

IMPORTANT NOTICE

THIS POST IS INTENDED TO WARN THE COMMUNITY ABOUT A SERIOUS PROBLEM IN THE HOPE OF PREVENTING AND EXPOSING CRIMES AGAINST CHILDREN. IT IS IN NO WAY INTENDED TO HARASS ANY INDIVIDUALS NAMED OR OTHERWISE OR TO ENCOURAGE OTHERS TO DO SO.

PLEASE TREAT THIS INFORMATION RESPONSIBLY * DO NOT ATTEMPT TO CONTACT ANYONE MENTIONED IN THIS POST 

 

 

Who is “Spiny Norman”?

When the Hampstead children’s disclosure videos first went viral on the internet, many turned to Youtube to listen to their young voices speaking about horrific abuse, depravities of man that children should never know about, horrified we listened.   A few short days later, February 20, 2015, the very first video claiming “It’s a Hoax” came out.  Uploaded by the Youtube account called “Sound Affects” at the time, but has changed it’s name many times since.  The channel is now, most recently been called “Spiny Norman”.  We know it’s the same channel that was created Oct. 30, 2014, after disclosure, yet before the videos went  viral in Feb. 2015, because the address of the channel hasn’t changed.  It is still “PleiadianReborn

pleiadianrebornytbanner

When the first “Hoaxtead: The Hampstead Hoax Exposed” video came out, the channel was called “Sound Affects”

 

SoundaffectsisHoaxtead

Now let’s see, who IS “Sound Affects?”

Screen shot #1

mychildren

Screen shot #2

mychildren3

Screen shot #3

mychildren2

 

Let me explain the importance of these Youtube comments and the video they appear on.  These comments were made by “Dexter S” and “Sound Affects” on the “Hoaxtead: The Hampstead Hoax Exposed” video made by “Sound Affects”,  the very first channel to make a video calling the Hampstead cover up a “HOAX”.

pleyadianrebornvideolist

Link: https://www.youtube.com/user/PleiadianReborn/videos  (Expand video section)

hoaxteadfirstvideo

The relevance of the comments about “illegal videos of MY children to the internet” on the first video titled “Hoaxtead: The Hampstead Hoax Exposed”, so soon after the children’s disclosure videos went viral, is that most parents don’t have “illegal” videos of their children.  In fact, at the time of the making of this video, it was NOT illegal to post their disclosures, Mrs. Justice Anna Pauffley’s Approved Judgment of March 19, 2015, in a London, U.K., Family Court did that.  None the less, “Sound Affects”, the channel owner, called the Hampstead children “MY children”.  And here in this video, he calls his children liars…

soundaffectsspinynormancallshischildrenliars

 

“Sound Affects” has since been changed to it’s recent name “Spiny Norman”, yet the web address still says “/PleiadianReborn/about” (link archived here)

spinynormanaboutyt

 

Here, in comments “Spiny Norman” says this video is the first use of the term “Hoaxtead” and this was the first “Anti-Hoax about the Hampstead case” video, where the comment, “posting illegal videos of MY CHILDREN to the internet” appeared.

 

spinynormanyoutubecommenthoaxtead

 

aaproductionsspinynorman

 

The “Spiny Norman” video says it  was produced by “AA Productions”, their channel logo:

shapeshifters2

And on Feb. 20th,  “Sound Affects” declares the case “DISMISSED” but it was NOT.

casedismissed

In fact, almost all of “Spiny Norman’s videos say “Case Closed”

spinynormancaseclosed

And “Game Over”

spinynormangameover

And just a few months later, the blog created to defend the alleged abusers, “Hoaxtead Research” on WordPress was created.  “Fact-finding to refute the ‘scurrilous’ allegations, support the Hampstead community and expose the hoaxers” (“hoaxers”, people like me who believe the children’s testimonies, police interviews and that the retractions were grossly coerced)  It is a place where the devil dwells…

hoaxteadbanner

 

 Here is an excellent video by “SuperEarther” featuring some of our screen shots!

 “Spiny Norman” IS Mr. Dearman, if he publishes anything, it is in CONTEMPT OF COURT and PREJUDICIAL to a FAIR TRIAL!  Screen capture all comments and posts made by “Spiny Norman” when you see them, archive.is the link.

Disclaimer

IMPORTANT NOTICE

THIS POST IS INTENDED TO WARN THE COMMUNITY ABOUT A SERIOUS PROBLEM IN THE HOPE OF PREVENTING AND EXPOSING CRIMES AGAINST CHILDREN. IT IS IN NO WAY INTENDED TO HARASS ANY INDIVIDUALS NAMED OR OTHERWISE OR TO ENCOURAGE OTHERS TO DO SO.

PLEASE TREAT THIS INFORMATION RESPONSIBLY * DO NOT ATTEMPT TO CONTACT ANYONE MENTIONED IN THIS POST 

 

The Many Faces Of Bridget Yorke

Who IS Bridget Yorke?  Why is she an important piece to the Hampstead puzzle?  What first alerted us to look into Bridget in the first place?  These are all questions to be answered in this post.  It will be long, the research has taken us more than a year of compiling information and finally it is time to come forth with what we know so far.

One alarm bell that rang the loudest was Bridget’s relationship to both Ella & Abraham.

bridgetyorkefriendsella

bridgetyorkefriendsabraham

Bridget is not commonly known around the Hampstead case supporters so I decided to do some “digging” or “tunneling” into who she was.  She has a Youtube channel that was once called “Biddy Baboon” but is now changed to “Bridget Yorke

bridgetyorkeytprofile

Ella & Abraham comment on Bridget’s youtube channel but call her “Biddy”, indeed this is the same channel.  Notice the same channel cover photo as her Facebook cover photo.

bridgetyorkeisbiddybaboon1

Her WordPress site “The Eyes Of Bridget Yorke”

bridgetyorkewpprofilebanner

This blog has an “About Me” page

bridgetyorkewordpressprofile1

Other websites include her Tumblr blog for Inspirational Sleuthing, Surfing & Stalking

bridgetyorketumblrbanner

Her work on Pintrest is related to fashion, this link came from the above Gravatar profile, so we know it’s hers.

bridgetyorkepintrest

Her Instagram account

bridgetyorkeinstagram

So now the question is, who IS Bridget Yorke?  Her Gravatar and WordPress profiles say, “I arrived in Paris as a South African model at 21 years old, in 1980, have been designing since 1984, am new at blogging, here goes…….”

Model Bridget Yorke at Maxim’s circa, 2007

Listen to those wonderfully intelligent answers in that video…whew!

Here’s Bridget Yorke at the “Bridget Yorke, I Love Paris” Party, 2007

bridgetyorkeiloveparis2

Here she is with her bestie, Ellen Von Unwerth, (who I’m sure will not be happy about this post.) At the “Ellen Von Unwerth & Bridget Yorke Masked Birthday Party”, 2008       

bridgetyorkeellenvonunwerth

Here, we see Bridget commenting on a photo avec son pere, circa 2009

bridgetyorkemabellefille

La Haute Société extraordinaire!!!  That’s the Luciferic Haute Société, lol!   Here is Alice calling a smashing photo of Bridget, Maman.  Smashing!  Hoaxtead should have a field day with this…indeed, a yummy moment for me Char!  (Just wait for the next screen shot below this)

aliceaufraymamanby

Now here’s the “THING” The High-Octane Screen Shot….Post by Alice, Bridget’s daughter, circa 2009

aliceaufraypostadrenaline

What’s that in your hands Niels?  Adrenaline you say?  Fresh from a WHAT?  A fresh Adrenal gland you say?  How the hell do you get adrenaline from a fresh adrenal gland? Is that from a tortured child, scared before being murdered?  And your friend there, you say he’s from Psych tv series?  So I suppose that would be James Roday in 2009.  I’m sure his handlers will be thrilled to see this.

Bridget’s partner who she had Alice with, is also a famous photographer, videographer with an interesting (strange) Youtube account.  Here’s what Kitsune has to say about their daughter

“You surely remember the marvellous Alice Auffray from the Maison Kitsuné x Yasmine Eslami shoot. Alice is a young Frenche (sic) model and young actress who was born in Paris, to a South African Ex Model turned clothes designer Mum, Bridget Yorke, and fashion photographer Dad Fred Aufray. Her Godmother is no one else than famed photographer Ellen von Unwerth, who started taking pictures of Alice from very early on.

Alice became very familiar with the camera thanks to her mother’s modelling years and her father’s profession and becoming a model was a very natural step for her.
She plans on becoming a stylist for fashion magazines, thats if she doesnt step into movies as she has a couple of interesting propositions already.”

Yes, well….all interesting stuff you say…

But what does this have to do with the Hampstead case?  

Well, it just so happens that Bridget likes to blog, she was blogging about fashion for a while which probably got boring, but also, something seems to have happened to her around 2009/2010, I’m not sure exactly what that “something” is/was but it had to do with “initiation” and failure of an initiation.  Let me start off with this video analysis of one of Hampstead cover-up’s main video creator and blog author, Jacqui Farmer from “Hampstead Research”.  She disguised her voice and accent specifically to avoid voice identification, she has a South African english accent.  “Hampstead Research” is no longer on line, however there are pieces of it HERE and the links work.   Many of the “Hampstead Research” videos can be found HERE.   I’ve written extensively about Jacqui Farmer/Charlotte Alton Ward HERE and my conclusion was that this is a person with skeletons stuffed in closets all over the place.  Here are a few screen shots to show you what I mean… This post is written by “Jacob Farmer”, one of the many fake profiles of Bridget/Jacqui/Charlotte

jaxsatanism1

Then a few weeks later, on the TapBlog, she posts about leaving the case

My final statement – Jacqui Farmer

Dear Everybody

Happy New Year.

We have had a fascinating time. Our Facebook group was co-opted extremely cleverly. I won’t bore you with the details but boy, have I learned a few lessons. This was my final statement:

My final statement is this:

First, I want to express full support to Angie. David Shurter suggested she was disinfo. I do not believe this. I love Angie. Angie works with Jesus. She is a gorgeous person. If there is anyone in this group you can trust it is Angie. I have told David this.

I am going on to work with David Shurter and Fiona Barnett. I don’t agree with what David did in breaking the group’s confidentiality and I do not agree with everything he says but I like him very much and know that he is not disinfo.

Satanic Ritual and Mind Control programming survivor

Hampstead is a case for all sorts of people. Everyone is welcome (not that it’s for me to welcome people – I am just a blogger who has become an activist). I rarely talk about my experiences because if you knew what they were they would blow you away.

I have worked with some of the most highly evolved spiritual beings on this planet. Some of them are not human. They are not ETs. I do not work with them now but I have witnessed heavenly miracles and beauty that would blow your minds. I have been in celestial spaces that are so holy and beautiful that some people have given their lives to enter them…..yet never been admitted.

I do not know Fiona but she states that she is a Christian. I do not have any problems with Christians. The New Testament has truth in it. Angie is an example of a highly evolved Christian. So is Reina Michaelson. So is Fiona, I believe. There are many others.

David is a shaman. He was explaining to Fiona why shamanism is the OPPOSITE of Luciferianism. Christianity is not the opposite of Luciferianism – shamanism is.

True shamen are born. They experience a “shamanic initiation”. This is a very trying time involving dreams of dismemberment etc. After it they acquire shamanic power. These are the real shamen. This is true. I have met a few real and many fakes. David is real. I know this because I used to be on the board of the Spiritual Crisis Network and I have known people recovering from these initiations. This is VERY real. Shamanic initiations are not used by the Luciferians as far as I am aware.

What IS used by the Luciferians is negative initiation. This is the main purpose of their torturing people. As Fiona explains in her interview, they know how to open up the neural pathways using torture. Opening up these pathways in certain sequences gives people powers. There are different levels in the cult. Some Luciferians have powers like mind reading.

But there is also positive initiation. You earn those by being a good person – a truly good person to the depths of your soul. When your suffering is for the good (and I don’t mean torture, I mean humility, service and self sacrifice) you earn gifts. These are the beautiful esoteric secrets of the Universe. Jesus was an Initiate. I am not the only person who believes that the New Testament is a metaphor for initiation.

I know this because it has happened to me. Normally people are not permitted to talk about it. If you go to a spiritual teacher and ask them to discuss initiation they will turn you away – if they are any good. The reason I can talk about it is because I failed – I was a Initiate who failed an initiation. So I have given myself permission to talk about it. I was at a high level (nowhere near Jesus) but I failed. It was not just me – I take responsibility but the Luciferians got me. The dark wanted to snuff out the light. The story is too long to tell here but what I have directly experienced would, as I said, blow your minds.

At this point I have to say that this topic is so esoteric that I have had to include information that is, technically, incorrect in order for anyone to be able to understand it. I apologise for this: my motive is to spread awareness and not lie or boast. I want people to understand why the Luciferians torture and abuse (which is something a “positive” initiate would rather die than do).

I had powers that would astonish you. I was a beautiful person. I could see into people’s minds. (You only gain that one if you are so so very loving and non-judgemental you will not judge what you see.) If I wanted to I could connect into a heavenly group mind (I no longer can). I could heal people. People who were sick or depressed used to come to my flat and go away feeling better. I never had to use money because everything I needed came to me – I never had to pay a gas bill (not because I was spongeing off someone else or committing any crime but because the gas came to me free in the most magical way). I gave most of my money away to poor people. I am not remotely beautiful but people would come up to me in the street and say, “You know – you are so so beautiful”. I was one of the “radiant ones”. Unfortunately, the Luciferians found out and messed me up because they have occult/esoteric knowledge. But not before I healed one of them.

What you are reading now is deeply esoteric. You are reading about the secrets of the Universe…..

Leaving now…..blessings to you all. Expect me lol.

Jacqui Farmer

“Jacqui Farmer” WAS a Luciferian….and she’s running the main blog associated with the Hampstead cover-up.  Ella & Abraham were very aware of this and dis-associated themselves from her pretty early on.  They posted about “Dearman’s Witches, Bitches & Snitches” on their blog which I read the day it was posted.  Let’s just say I had a bit of a freak out about this…lol!  I wrote to them  via email wishing them good luck and saying I was leaving the case.

jfemailtoeablurred1

Ella and/or Abraham wrote back:

jfemailtoea2

By June of 2015, “Jacqui” was writing to Hoaxtead Research, the blog denying the cover up, and indeed giving them all of my information and history from my Facebook profile.  She has put my life as well as that of my family’s lives in extreme danger.

jacquibitchhoaxresaddy

This woman gave my personal information to my opposition, my children’s names and photos, my husband and his family.  She has put my children in harm’s way then has the balls to defame my character, my work and call ME a Luciferian.  HA!  That’s laughable, clearly she is projecting herself onto us.   Her team is not out to save the children as she, herself, states.  They are out to harm the reputations of other case supporters and above ALL of that, she destroys the mother, Ella Gareeva’s character as well.  This woman has single-handedly destroyed all credibility of anyone involved in this case.  Except for hers.  So what do they call that?   a disinfo agent?  a shill?  No, it’s beyond that….she worked at Tavistock, admittedly with Luciferians.  So perhaps she would be something along the lines of cointel-pro?!?!  Maybe.

jacquibitch3

jacquijustoutonsteemitcomment

As Abraham & Ella question in comments HERE,

“Why the prevalence of C.IA.,MI5, cointel, Bitches, Witches and snitches , pimps ponces and nonces , shills trolls and moles all over the Hampstead Cover Up. Why so much obfuscation, muddying of the waters ?
What could be so important ?”

Yes, indeed….WHICH side does she work for???  

By Sept. 2015 her Hampstead Research Twitter account was posting about “proof of Ella’s guilt”

jacquibitchtwitter

Around the same time, Angel Powerless Disney came out with this video, where Angie tells Jake Clarke on the phone about some hackers who had hacked Ella’s & Ricky’s computers.  Shetold him how videos were found of Ella masturbating her son (aged 3 at the time of alleged video) to sleep and that Ella was involved, if not fully responsible, for her children’s abuse. Sounds like a bunch of BULLSHIT to me…especially since Ella’s computer and phone had been seized by police when they first reported the abuse.  The computer in question was in the hands of the Barnet police at said time of “Hacking”, lol….here’s the proof;  From Ella’s website, Hampstead Cover Up

laptopseized

So because I spoke out about this claim being BULLSHIT, I received this harassment on Jake Clarke’s wall from a sock account of “Jacqui Farmer”/”Jeanette Falcon”/Bridget Yorke, head of the “Ella was IN IT” team…#EllaGate

jeanettefalconjakeclarkepost1

jeanettefalconjakeclarkepost2

My response to this post;

jeanettefalconjakeclarkepost3

What I (and many others) think is this…Bridget was a Luciferian initiate, failed an initiation and they harmed her.  This is her revenge.  Or she is STILL involved with Luciferians in Paris at war with the satanic cult in London.  Kerth Barker (46-page pdf at bottom) speaks about the war between the lower class (Satanists) and the upper class elitists (Luciferians).  This is a very plausible explanation.

My Facebook page, “Believe The Children” has a Note that I co-wrote with Sonya Van Gelder called “Panem & Circenses”, this is when we started speaking up about #EllaGate, the term given to this chapter of lunacy….There is so much more, but I’m going to end here and hope others have contributions.  Why is Bridget involved here?  Because she understands the “Cult” life and wanted her revenge.  Nice!

Oh, yes, here are a few of her LinkdIn profiles

bridgetyorkelinkedinprofile2

bridgetyorkelinkedinprofile3

charlottewardlinkdinprofile

charlotte-alton-carleea-to-alfred-webre-2014

carleeaaltonlinkdinprofile

I am not the only person who believes the Biddy Baboon/Bridget Yorke/Jacqui Farmer/Charlotte Alton Ward connections exist, our good friend “Truth 1” recently wrote a very detailed post entitled,

Investigating Hampstead Research Ops

Check it out!

 

Disclaimer

IMPORTANT NOTICE

THIS POST IS INTENDED TO WARN THE COMMUNITY ABOUT A SERIOUS PROBLEM IN THE HOPE OF PREVENTING AND EXPOSING CRIMES AGAINST CHILDREN. IT IS IN NO WAY INTENDED TO HARASS ANY INDIVIDUALS NAMED OR OTHERWISE OR TO ENCOURAGE OTHERS TO DO SO.

PLEASE TREAT THIS INFORMATION RESPONSIBLY * DO NOT ATTEMPT TO CONTACT ANYONE MENTIONED IN THIS POST 

Charlotte Ward-The Tavistock Shill

My blog came under attack recently by a profile called “GumpGump” on Voat.co.  I know, I laughed at the ridiculous name too, but while checking out the profile, I saw that it was our long, lost, creepily-jealous Jacqui Farmer/Charlotte Ward from that information-gathering “Hampstead Research” blog.

jacquibitchhamres

I found this post written by “GumpGump” calling my blog “Disinformation”

jacquibitch3

So where to start???  First of all Charlotte, I wasn’t “promoting my website”  I posted mostly links to other websites.  Second, I’ll quote you directly here, “Kris is somone who will hammer you if you do not use your real name.” I actually have never done that, that’s a lie.  You then go on to say “…but I never do because what I’m doing is fucking DANGEROUS”  You’re not the only one in danger, we all are while researching horrific, sadistic abusers.  Yet you drop MY name.  Putting me and my family in danger.  How is that even alright?  How can you say you care about children, yet hand me over for a SECOND TIME to extremely dangerous people?  You are not who you say you are, not for a second.  You don’t give a shit about children, you just want revenge on the “illuminati” that refused your sorry ass.  You’re a liar AND a coward.

You say I’ve never done “one second of decent investigation”  You’re not exactly the best person to critique,  during your short time with “Hampstead Research” you made millions of mistakes.  

I’ve never claimed to be a great investigator nor journalist.  This blog was only a place to put the screen shots I took, to organize and tell the researchers what I was finding, I’m not trying to do the same type of blog you had, oh, and where IS your blog?  Where’s all of your amazing research?  I don’t see it anywhere. I couldn’t “nick” any information from you or your website because by the time I really got this blog off the ground, yours was deleted.  

You coward, “Oh, I got death threats!”  Lol, that’s a daily occurrence around here, thanks to you giving Hoaxtead my information.  Big deal, that comes with the territory.

jacquibitchhoaxresaddy

“Fear is the mind killer”-G&A

Nope, not friends with CAS, but I do get a lot of hits from her website, so I’ll not say anything.

I don’t have any ego about the research, I’m happy to say I think you’re a better researcher, but where IS your research…we could really use it, are you with-holding it from us?  Are you keeping it to yourself?  We all share research, I don’t own anything, I’m not going to be the one to solve this case, I’m happy to just be a part of it.  Because I can’t just sit here and do nothing about sadistic pedo rings…I’m here doing this, where are you and why are you attacking so VICIOUSLY the people around this case?  

You left this case, remember?  

jacquibitchofftoworkwithds

Why are you still bothering us?  Go. Away. 

And I’m pretty sure David Shurter calls the Hampstead Cover-Up a “Psy-Op” as well as “#PizzaGate” as seen here….

dspizzagate1

He also says “Ella is in the cult” just like you, APD, Tracy Morris, Kristen Elizabeth and Malcolm Conrad Ogilvy also claim.  I’ll take these names down when you take my name off all the public places you’ve plastered, tarred and feathered me.  So if any of you are freaking out, just tell Charlotte to take a step back and stop harassing me.

Abe and Ella dis-associated themselves from this crew right here long ago, and they warned me about Charlotte.  Unfortunately, I had just made her co-admin of a secret group called “In Support Of Ella Gareeva & Her Children”.  So instead of kicking Charlotte out, like I should have, I left the group quietly and blocked her.  She says I set her up, I could have been much nastier but I wasn’t.  I had no ego about being the admin of that really great group of people,  Charlotte did.  Everything is about Charlotte, “Oh, I made a mistake again, I’m just working too fast…you can’t keep up?  Oh, I’ll slow down for you…” Fuck off.

She’s an initiate into something much too complicated to bother explaining to us peons here…

jacquibitchinitiation

Lol, free gas just “came to her”!  Go, go away.  You’re a disinfo shill, an initiate and a traitor.  You’ve caused Ella more pain and anguish during her most difficult days.  She speaks about you here, after posting sensitive info she told you not to publish.  Just like Angela Power Disney uploaded videos to youtube that weren’t supposed to be made public.  You two alone wrecked so much havock in this case, it was fully on purpose.  Not to omit Kirsten Elizabeth on HRes Twitter, she claims that Ella was in the cult and she believed evidence of Ella’s “Guilt”.  Let me remind you’ve never produced any evidence other than hearsay, so what exactly are you doing?  You’re destroying a woman who lost her children to the cult?  And her defenders?  Back off, we are fighting a war YOU CANNOT WIN!  

You heartless, nasty women.  Shame on you.  

Shame on anyone that believes you are good people.  

jacquibitchtwitter

As for Charlotte working for Tavistock, check!

From her own book, “Illuminati Party”

jacquibitchilluminatiparty

jacquibitchtavistock

In the words of my very dear friend Sonya, who Charlotte so UN-eloquently tried to dish;

The case has been fraught with spies, agents, shills, trolls and the occasional psychopath. Continued intimidation, harassment, and bullying via our opposition as well as fellow activists is ongoing.
Infiltrating, opposing or discrediting movements serves a number of purposes in an information/credibility war. Besides gaining inside information, disinformation agents may deliberately leak information, create division, and steer the ‘group thinking’ and activity of support networks away from achieving real outcomes. Controlled opposition also satisfies the casual concerned observer that “someone is doing something”.
Such infiltration also serves to ‘media tarnish’ the reputation of the entire movement and therefore the public’s perception of the cause it stands for. This simple kind of manipulation is extremely effective, if we are blind to it. This is something that dedicated activists need to fully understand and remember in all our dealings, if we are ever to make a dent in breaking open cases such as this.

Here is more information on this fake Charlotte Ward/Jacqui Farmer/GumpGump/JustOut/Autumn Summers/Bella Bright/Anna Bella/Jeanette Falcon/Jacob Farmer/Biddy Baboon/Bridget Yorke/Just Human person in “The Many Faces Of Bridget Yorke”

Let me just end it here for now, I believe the children when they said:

jacquibitchibelieve

I Believe The Children and not the adults that lie about or cover up the abuse.  I think we are seeing a world woke to the ugly truth that pedophile rings exist in massive numbers and the religion is just a cover to mask the reality, which is sado-masochistic pedophilia, adrenochrome addiction, production and sales of snuff videos, human trafficking, infanticide and much more.  

Rise, True Warriors, Rise…#LightTheDark

Kris

On The Legitimacy Of This Investigation

#PizzaGate, not #HampsteadCoverUp

This post was found on Reddit yesterday, it is now gone as the author deleted the account.  We felt it was worth re-posting;

“On The Legitimacy Of This Investigation”

(with an important message to fellow journalists I know are lurking on this sub)(self.pizzagate)

submitted 23 hours ago* by Throw-Away-Journo

Edit: this is a throw-away account, I will not be using it further nor answering any questions

Edit2: impossible to get such a piece passed my editor, so I’m leaving it here for people to distribute (send it to journos if you have the emails, it will silently resonate)


We are told the work on /r/Pizzagate (and other message boards) is illegitimate because people are rushing to conclusions, or because they are being paranoid, or partisan (despite so many of different political complexions provably working together). The subtitle here of course is that the State is solely legitimate to suspect and investigate crimes.

But what if the State itself is, in a systemic way, responsible for said crimes? It wouldn’t be a first; after all, democide (death by government, a word surprisingly absent from conversations) was the first cause of non-natural deaths in the 20th century. Whether one is from the right, left, or center, one cannot deny government is the number one abuser, enslaver and serial-killer in History. We may honestly disagree on the ways to eradicate the phenomenon, or we may regret that fact, but we cannot deny it.

So, if the State itself is committing crimes, it is the people’s sovereign and sacred duty to expose it. Those who understand this truth best tend to become journalists. At least, that’s what drove me to the profession.

Now specifically on this work. First, there is context; institutional child abuse is already a common-knowledgephenomenon. From the Presidio affair to Jimmy Saville and the BBC, or from the Vatican’s historic involvement in covering-up pedophilia to US legislators’ documented trips on the “Lolita Express”, from the questions still surrounding Dutroux to the Hampstead doubts, the scourge has been featured in the news, movies, documentaries, art work. There have also been many policymakers, prosecutors, investigators and victims denouncing the very phenomenon; see for example British MP John Mann passionate speech before Parliament on the subject last year, or the extensive report by former undercover Interpol agent (Bannon). Indeed it is a secret de Polichinelle. So the only possible disagreement can be on the scale and systemicity of the phenomenon.

To honestly decide whether that’s what we are seeing in the Podesta emails, please have a look at this one example. Look at the invitation at the end of the thread. Ms Luzzatto is inviting people (among which are John and Mary Podesta) to a farm in Lovettsville. This is what she says:

We plan to heat the pool, so a swim is a possibility. Bonnie will be Uber Service to transport Ruby, Emerson, and Maeve Luzzatto (11, 9, and almost 7) so you’ll have some further entertainment, and they will be in that pool for sure.

Impossible, you say? They couldn’t possibly be speaking about abusing the children! After all, what step-grandmother would offer three innocent children up for group abuse?

This is how invitee Drew Littman answers the invitation:

I’ve never had an affair, so I pass the Walter Jones test.

If you aren’t aware, Walter B. Jones has for 20 years been the U.S. Representative for North Carolina’s 3rd congressional district; in DC he’s regarded as the absurd caricature of a do-gooder, i.e. he is a noble man indeed.

Agreed, if that example was the only one, one could dismiss it as baroque misinterpretation. But there’s more, much more. Let’s not even get into the handkerchiefs and codewords – even though “cheese pizza” is a known euphemism for “child porn” (and there are abundant examples in the Podesta emails where that term is used in very strange and out-of-context manners).

How about the fact that John and Tony Podesta are old friends of Jeffery Epstein, Dennis Hastert and Clement Freud, three convicted child molesters? Who has so many child rapists as friends? Who stays friends with child rapists after they’re exposed and convicted?

How about the Katy Grannan photos plastered around the Podestas’ mansion, depicting naked teenagers?

How about Tony Podesta writing he’s “very good and a little wired” from being seated next to “the kids” on an airplane?

How about the underground vault on the Podestas’ property which admittedly allows them to watch “very complicated video pieces”?

If you are feeling ill-at-ease, that reaction is honorable. And the worse thing is you haven’t yet seen much. But for more, you’ll have to look for it. Indeed one might be breaking statutory laws by linking to some of the clues Internet sleuths have found in the past three weeks.

For example, did you know James Alefantis, listed 49th “most influential” person in DC by GQ, chef and White House regular, boyfriend of David Brock, owner of Comet Ping Pong, had an Instagram account filled with references to and depictions of child abuse and torture? Indeed it’s not just the frescoes in his restaurant or the “artists” he hosts there; it’s not even the fact his menu and the logos of three other iconic businesses next door feature FBI-recognizedpedophilia symbols. No, this is about his own posts, pictures, comments and friends on social media. Again, you’ll have to look it up for yourself. It is hardly ambiguous. Indeed it is Alefantis who puts the pizza in #Pizzagate.

If that surprises you, did you know Arun Rao was caught “liking” several of Alefantis’ creepiest toddler Instagram posts? Again, that could be dismissed – only there’s all this context, and the fact Mr Rao is a Assistant US attorney, and charged with prosecuting child pornography and abuse.

And if you’re still not distinguishing the pattern, did you know that Laura Silsby (Gayler), the woman caught trying tosmuggle thirty-three children out of Haiti (a country where the Clinton Foundation isn’twithoutcontroversy), whose release from jail became a personalmatterfor Ms Clinton, thereafter became an associate of MyStateUSA, which changed its name to AlertSense, and which is the one providing the technology to issue Amber Alerts?

Enough already. If anything I have proven the legitimacy of the following question:

Is there a systemic pedophilia problem in Washington DC, as we already suspect there is one in Hollywood?

In terms of national systemicity, the statistics are eloquent. The International Centre for Missing Children (ICMEC) estimates that 8 million children are reported missing each year around the world. Of that number, according to U.S. Department of Justice research, an estimated 800,000 children will go missing in the United States alone — a rate of over 2’000 missing children each day — with 466,949 of those cases entered into the FBI’s National Crime Information Center (NCIC) database in 2014. With a current child population (aged 0 – 17) of around 74 million in the United States, the U.S. Department of Justice figures equate to around 1 child in every 92 going missing in the United States each year.

This looks like a systemic problem indeed. Childhood disappearances outnumber cancer deaths in the United States by one third.

Therefore, given the sheer amount of leaked emails, and the suspected phenomenon’s scale and repartition, it is likely the data dumps (Podesta and other Wikileaks, Guccifer 1/2, DNCLeaks, etc.) provide some clue to the problem. Therefore, they should be investigated thoroughly under than particular lens, and suspicions need to be corroborated with other (and previously) known facts.

So, my fellow journalists, why aren’t you all looking into this? Is it easy for you to dismiss it as confirmation bias?

I’m not going to answer the question for you. At least hop on the bandwagon: this is coming out with or without your help. But remember some moments are defining, in one’s career, for one’s conscience.

I’ll conclude with two excerpts of the Munich Declaration of the Duties and Rights of Journalists (kind of our own Hippocratic Oath).

The responsibility of journalists vis-a-vis the public has precedence over any other responsibility, in particular towards their employers and the public power.

[A journalist’s duties include] respecting the truth no matter what consequences it may bring about to him, … defending the freedom of information, of commentaries and of criticism, [and] not suppressing essential information.

… and one question:

If this doesn’t matter, what does?

reddit1

 

reddit2

reddit3

reddit4

 

 

Further reading:

Suppressed Pedophilia Allegations Reveal Culture of Satanic Ritual Abuse

Evidence of Organized Pedophilia and Child-Trafficking Implicates Governments, Media, Churches and Charities

Persons of Interest 🔎 James Achilles Alefantis aka jimmycomet at Comet Ping Pong

TwitterGate and PizzaGate censorship on social media and beyond + Paul Wilson found guilty!

Huge Breakthrough in D.C. Pedophilia Ring

Another Reddit piece that needs reblogging:

As promised, Here is the offline backup of your subreddit. (v/pizzagate)

submitted 11 hours ago by erktheerk

Done uploading. I’ll host the backup for 24 hours. I encourage everyone to download copies. I’ve included a zip of the backup in the main folder.

I skipped all of the meta data scans I normally do and removed all my auxiliary scripts from the file, but kept the main script I use to gather the data from a sub. It will not work out the box as anyone who wants to use it needs to set up oauth2 on their own, I removed that section of the script as it is the oauth2 info for my main account.

There were also a few scans I couldn’t do such as overlapping subreddit users who also participate in since the sub was banned less than 5 minutes after I completed the main scan. I BARELY made it.

I need to work out a few kinks in part of the script to get a complete user list, but that info is available in the database. When it’s fixed it’s a complete list of every user who has ever interacted with the sub sorted by most active to least. Might be useful to mass PM users to tell them about the new site, but that also might piss Reddit off, so I will not be including it for public consumption. Don’t want to contribute to any witch hunts.

Here is the main folder:

http://gigabytegenocide.com/pizzagate/

Here is where the HTML versions are:

http://gigabytegenocide.com/pizzagate/redmash/

Example one of the files that is sorted by date:

http://gigabytegenocide.com/pizzagate/redmash/pizzagate_date.html

The links to the comments on the list lead to the HTML folder and are threaded in the final order they were on the sub based on comment score:

http://gigabytegenocide.com/pizzagate/redmash/html/t3_5brme2.html

Sorry about the crappy formatting. Something went wrong and I am running out of time to trouble shoot it. There is just a bunch of ”’ at the top of the page.

The RAW. DB file can he found in the database folder and if anyone knows their way around those types of files you can extract all the info I gathered.

If anyone has webdev skills and wants to contribute I’ve been wanting to clean up the formatting, add search function, multiple pages, and more of a Reddit looking design. I used some copy/paste JS to make the list sortable and some super basic CSS. But it works.

Any questions let me know. Thanks for all the praise and appreciation. I do this as a hobby and lucky enough I already had the tools ready to go in time go get the sub before it was gone.

I’m not a participate in your sub, but truly hope this help you guys.

 

More links, etc HERE

stoptheabusechildhand

 

How “SatanicViews” & “James Hind” Become Julian Vayne of the IOT

We will show you how “Satanicviews” becomes Julian Vayne, leader of the “Illuminates of Thanateros”, or the IOT, with his partner Nikki Wyrd, through a maze of different profiles, web-sites, child abuse accusations by the mother of the abused child, as well as causing the distress responsible for the sectioning of our beloved Hampstead activist, Jake Clarke.

This comment, made by “Pallas Athena” can be found here and is web-archived here , displays several relationships of “Satanicviews” and is a very important piece to point out.  We will show you how this connects blogger “Satanicviews” with “Blog of Baphomet” author, leader of the cult Illuminates of Thanateros, and “List 616” author Julian Vayne.

satanicviewsjulianvayne

The Hampstead researchers and activists that have been around from the beginning of the case, since early February 2015, when the videos were first leaked on Henry Curteis’ “TapBlog” might remember our first run-in with a profile named “Jay Vendoza”.  Jay Vendoza left a rather cryptic message on one of our open groups, it read;

jayvendozadiforums2

We searched Jay Vendoza and found his Disqus profile with this cute little devil avatar

jayvendozadevilavatar

We searched Facebook for “Jay Vendoza”, it had been renamed to “James Hind”.

jhindfbprofile2

James Hind is a self-proclaimed satanist, occultist and creeper of the left-hand path. Notice the same little devil avatar.

jhindsatanist

James Hind on Twitter

jameshindmysatantwitter

On Twitter, James Hind posted many threats and addresses 

jakeclarkeaddress

An article posted today 4/10/16 by “Satanicviews” on his blog “Satanicviews, Hardcore views on international satanism”, writes,

“The Satan Hunter Jake Clarke was sectioned in a mental asylum by his own agency, encouraged by Satan Hunters Angela Power Disney and Rupert Quaintance.  I warned Clarke what to expect since I foresaw what would happen to him if he continued on his path, he ignored me, he suffered the fate he deserved.  Any misfortune that Harris and his Satan Hunter fellows bring upon themselves is by their own agency, it has nothing to do with me, Satan or any other external agency.”

satanicviews1

Here is a “Blog Share” post on Hoaxted Research about James Hind’s blog “Satanic Views”

satanicviewsblogsharehoaxtead

Then James Hind started a blog called “List 616” , however, it’s now deleted.

list616hind

List 616 was a list of “Satan Hunters” to be watched 

list616

list616c

Jake Clarke was on this List616

jakeclarkelist616

Now we have Nathaniel J Harris who has multiple run-ins with a troll and finds himself on “List 616” and Nathaniel is not too happy about it.

*Take note of the “clown” photo.*

nathanieljharrisclownpic

Nathaniel J Harris was, perhaps he still is, a chaos magician, an author, a blogger and a cult whistleblower.  He made this video to warn the occult communities about the dangers of child-sexual abuse within them.   Nathaniel was once partners with a woman named Nikki Wyrd (nee Nicola Ward) and they had a baby together.  They have long since broken up and are with other partners.  Nikki Wyrd is administrator on a Facebook group called “Illuminates of Thanateros”

nikkiwyrdfbphotos

illuminatesofthanaterosfb

Nikki Wyrd is now partners with Julian Vayne (nee Juian LeFay), they both appear to be absolute narcissists.  Both profiles are filled with photos of themselves, almost always with glasses on…

julianvaynefbphotos.png

Julian Vayne writes for the “Blog of Baphomet” as does Nikki Wyrd.  The two wrote “The Book of Baphomet” together as well as both are contributors at the “Psychedelic PressUK” 

blogofbaphomet

Nathaniel Harris has been partners now for over 10 years with a woman named Jasmin DaVille (I hope you two don’t mind, this photo is priceless, love it! Thank you!)

nathanjasmine

Jasmine has a child that was brutally abused by Colin Bately and other members of the IOT as described in Jasmine’s new blog called,“Occult Paedophile Ring-The Truth” where she writes 

“Nathaniel and I get on with the lives we have now but our minds relive the horror of the disclosures my child made to us. One of the most difficult was my child telling Nathaniel that his own parents, his mother Ann, his stepfather Adrian Bryn-Evans, and his biological father Robert Harris were all involved, as was Nicola Ward (aka Nikki Wyrd), the mother of his daughter, and her partner Julian Vayne, as well as a number of others known to us.”

Jasmine, in her lovely voice speaks about finding, or rather not finding, justice for her child and realizes perhaps there is no justice to be found in this world. Listen to her in this video.  There WILL come a time when justice will be served, of this I am sure.

satanicviewshoaxcommentbecomejvayne

I received this message today here on the website from a Hoaxtead Research admin “Pallas Athene” regarding our post today, I will share it here for you all to see.

pallasathene1

Nikki, darling, I gave a lovely introduction to Mr. Harris and Ms. Jasmine. I know who Mr. Harris is.  I’ve read his blog.  That’s how I’ve known who you were long before you sent this snarling, jealous ex-girlfriend rant.  Nobody else would waste so much hate-energy other than an ex-girlfriend.  Seriously.   There are none more judgmental than those who hate to be judged.  Your heart appears to be filled with hate and anger.  I’m sorry, but your heart should be filled with love, joy and true peace for you only get one chance and why waste that chance being bloody miserable all the time.  Life can be much more fulfilling and if it’s not, you’re doing something wrong.  I do not judge you or your religion, indeed no one should judge another based on their relationship with a higher power/energy.  I feel that is a very personal space existing within each of us.  

But you didn’t even need bother dropping by, Julian gave himself up over on Twitter already…. This happened 3/10/16

jvtwittera

jvtwitter1

jvtwitter2

jvtwitter3

“Checkmate”

As if this was all a pre-conceived, orchestrated game.

Playing with a young mans freedom.

Julian didn’t deny it either when I called him “Julian” and sadly, none of his HoaxRes buddies that he tagged showed up to support him. No one.  Zip. Zero.  Zilch.  Sorry, guess the party’s over guys.  Not even a mention in the comments on the blog, totally weird.  Like you didn’t even exist to them.  Nice group of friends there Julian, that you spent defending for a year, eh?  Wow!  Dearman’s a bitch!  When you decide to give him up come see me!  BTC on Fb pm’s

Anyway, we’ve recently caught SatanicViews leaving the Hampstead case where he says Hoaxtead Research should not DELETE all material related to Jake Clarke. Hoaxtead Research has either deleted or hidden ALL CONTENT RELATED TO JAKE CLARKE for fear of liability.  Because they KNOW they are culpable in his sectioning.  Especially James Hind, who we can now know is Julian Vayne (Julian LeFay)  

Go get him Clarke Family….your son and brother is a victim of intentional harassment in order to stop him from finding out the truth…that there is wide-spread child sexual abuse happening within these cults.

byebyejameshindedited

OH MY….

carlasummerssinglecomment

Rabbit holes run so very deep and this worries me

julianvayneinfantsschool1

julianvayneinfantschool3blurred

Julian says he was teaching in an “INFANTS SCHOOL”on 18/11/15, teaching infants about “Sex & History”.  To infants.  Where he saw the nonsense poem “Pangolin”.

These next screen shots are taken from “Sex & History” website linked above…

julianvayneexetersexhistory

julianvayneexetersexhistory2

A video on the website, “Intimate Worlds exhibition: exploring Sexual Health and Education possibilities” is described as (Published on Nov 13, 2013)

“As part their public engagement programme, in the run-up to the Intimate Worlds exhibition, experts from Exeter’s Royal Albert Memorial Museum and the University of Exeter meet representatives from the health and education sectors to discuss how this beautiful and candid display of sexually-themed objects from history might best unlock its potential to enhance the delivery of sex education.

julianvayneexeterawards

He works with children yet is a strong proponent of drug use & witchcraft…WOW!

julianvayneiot2

Are we SURE James Hind is Julian?  Yes, we are…

njhbtccomment

The “ref” to arrest was this comment on Hoaxtead Research was…

satanicviewsnathanielharris

Nathaniel Harris hadn’t told anyone he’d been arrested on harassment charges, the only person who would have known would be Julian/James.

As “James Hind”,  Julian posted this on Twitter….

jhind5

Is this the person you want teaching your children about “Sex & History”?

julianvayneblondegirl

julianvaynechallenge1

I changed their  “chaos sigil” to love…

chaoticlove

May love conquer all, heal all and above all…prevail!

Disclaimer

IMPORTANT NOTICE

THIS POST IS INTENDED TO WARN THE COMMUNITY ABOUT A SERIOUS PROBLEM IN THE HOPE OF PREVENTING AND EXPOSING CRIMES AGAINST CHILDREN. IT IS IN NO WAY INTENDED TO HARASS ANY INDIVIDUALS NAMED OR OTHERWISE OR TO ENCOURAGE OTHERS TO DO SO.

PLEASE TREAT THIS INFORMATION RESPONSIBLY * DO NOT ATTEMPT TO CONTACT ANYONE MENTIONED IN THIS POST 

Threats To Anonymous #OpHampstead & Jake C. From Satanists

First of all, let’s get one thing clear….

WE BELIEVE THE CHILDREN, “P” & “Q”

When you threaten one Anonymous page, you threaten all of Anonymous.

We became aware of some serious threats when a supporter of Anonymous #OpHampstead, who IS NOT THE ADMIN OF THE PAGE, but a SUPPORTER of the page, told us he was being harassed.  His name is blurred out for his protection, but Jake C. was thought to be the admin solely based on the fact that he shared their posts on Facebook.  In fact, Jake’s home address was published on Twitter.  It was quickly reported and taken down, however, many threats to the Anonymous page & Twitter account have been issued by satanist James Hind, also known as “SatanicViews”, more recently found out to be Julian Vayne, author of “The Blog of Baphomet”.  SEE THIS POST

Here they are:

threats1

threats

James Hind @views_s 

threat

threatA

threat4

threat1

threat2

threat3

Lol, REALLY?!?!  I think there are literally MILLIONS of people that would absolutely DISAGREE with you James Hind.  There are child abuse issues in EVERY religion, your religion is no different than any other.  PERIOD.

James Hind even posted Jake’s address where he lives.  This tweet was reported and taken down very quickly.  But do you see the level of intimidation directed at Jake?

jakeclarkeaddress

James Hind also ran a blog called “List 616”, which is no longer “live”.

jakeclarkeparentsnursery

Photo from James Hind’s Twitter Account https://twitter.com/views_s/media

jakeclarketwitter1

The myriads of blog posts tagged with “Jake Cl…” from Hoaxtead Research (use your VPN when visiting & commenting there will give the blog your IP address, location & email-beware)  recently made all of their posts “Private”, knowing full well how much abuse those very articles included.  These screen captures were from the search results.

jakeclarkehoax3

jakeclarkehoax4

jakeclarkehoax2

operationcleanup

MKULTRA 666 Video about Jake is here and here.

A recent posting by fake profile, JHind, states how he supports new UK legislation AGAINST internet trolling…laughable really.  YOU are the TROLL.

jameshindinternettrolls

myhouseaddressblurred

jakeclarkeaddress

And sent many private messages like this with your FAKE profile imitating ME…

ksc5

A fantastic account of the implosion of Julian Vain, Nikki Weird, the id-IOT happening now… PETER J. CARROLL, THE I.O.T. & RITUAL CHILD ABUSE

divider

The activists and child protection campaigners are NOT ATTACKING YOUR RELIGION.  We are after a paedo-sadistic, child/infant snuff film-producing sex cult that uses their videos to blackmail the elites, politicians, judges and in fact, royalty.  This is bigger than your measly threats, it’s bigger than most people can wrap their minds around.  We don’t care if you worship your own piss, let alone satan or lucifer while murdering a child, drinking its’ blood or eating its’ flesh.  What we are opposed to is the murdering children part.  The sexually abusing children part.  The torture of children while wearing horrific masks to cover your faces and robes to hide your body so you cannot be recognized in the videos you make.  So please understand when we activists say,

queeniefinger

The Jean-Clement Recording

From “Hampstead Cover-Up” 

Audio Here “The concealed evidence – Jean Clement’s recording”

jeanclementmeme

Link to meme by @Drifloud

Audio transcript by Kane Slater Creator & Manager, CANNABIS CURES CANCERS! & United Kingdom Prime Minister Theresa May Eats Babies

 

Gabriel and Alisa Dearman, ages 8 and 9, speaking with their mother’s boyfriend, Abraham Christie, and their mother, Ella Gareeva, at the home of Abraham’s brother-in-law, London Metropolitan Police Special Constable Jean-Clement Yaohirou September 4, 2014
[My comments in brackets. –K.S.]
00:00:17
Abraham: Don’t tell Jean-Clement any lies.
Alisa: Yes.
Abraham: Do you hear me?
Alisa: Yes, Papa.
Abraham: Otherwise we’ll have to lock you up in the jail. Have you got room in the jail to lock her up tonight?
Jean-Clement: (laughter) Abraham: Have you got room, yes or no?
Jean-Clement: She is too pretty for that. (laughter)
Abraham: So, uh, tell him what you said: You deserve to be locked up for killing the babies. Listen, did you kill any babies?
Alisa: No.
Abraham: Who killed the babies?
Alisa: Papa. Papa hold our hand.
Jean-Clement: Hold your hands?
Abraham: Yeah.
Alisa: We put on our hand, but –
Jean-Clement: Yeah.
Abraham: He makes you put your – No, he puts your hand on.
Alisa: And then he puts his hand on ours, cuts off the baby’s head off. He’s strong. Abraham: He teaches you –
Alisa: He pushes, he pushes down and he teaches us how to cut the baby. He says he wants us to do it when we’re older.
Abraham: What you think? What, you don’t understand what I’m telling you? They are killing babies, wholesale … wholesale. They are killing them, they are drinking the blood, and they are eating the meat. And the skulls of the babies, they are tying them, four skulls here, here, four skulls here, one here, two here, one here, two here, elbows here. And they are making – what about the shoes? This baby-skin –
Alisa: Yes, baby, baby-skin shoes.
Abraham: Who makes the baby-skin shoes?
Alisa: Felix. There’s one man they call Felix, and Daniel.
Abraham: What is his normal job? Is he a shoemaker?
Alisa: Yes. He’s a shoemaker.
Abraham: What about the doctor? What about the doctor, is he, is he one as well?
Alisa: Yes.
Abraham: What about your headmistress, is she one as well?
Alisa: Yes.
Abraham: How many skulls does she wear when she dances?
Alisa: Twenty.
Abraham: So, uh –
Jean-Clement: Twenty baby — ?
Abraham: So how many, how many adults are involved?
Alisa: Like maybe like ooh four hundred, four hundred plus thir – four hundred fifty, four hundred thirty, something like that.
Abraham: Over four hundred adults are involved. And how many skulls do they wear each? … How many skulls do they wear?
Alisa: Uh, twenty.
Abraham: So there’s over four hundred adults and they’re all wearing twenty skulls each. Can you do the math? Over eight hundred. [Actually, the math on that works out to over eight thousand skulls.]
———————————
6:50
Abraham: All three children are involved in the cult now. From two different men, who are cult members. She came to me, because she knew I didn’t, I wasn’t a weird guy. She knew there was something, I was clean. And she knew, in her heart, that I could help her. She didn’t know how. I didn’t know how. … Her first husband, he sent the second man to her. Some of her friends that come to the house …
Jean-Clement: Uh-huh.
Abraham: They come to the house and they go to the school and sex the children, behind her back.
Jean-Clement: Is uh, is uh, is that … in the school? Abraham: In the school, in the church, in McDonald’s, at the swimming pool, at the local swimming pool.
Gabriel (?): In houses.
Abraham: And in people’s houses.
Jean-Clement: A club, like?
Abraham: Yeah.
Jean-Clement: OK.
Abraham: And in their houses, and in their houses. Happens in school during school hours, you go there on a Wednesday and you will arrest them all. And you will take the children in the school ‘cause they do it to every child in the school. And I guarantee you, out of the children, one hundred of them will talk.
Jean-Clement: How come the parents don’t know?
Abraham: Because the parents are all involved.
Alisa: All of them.
Abraham: That’s why it’s kept a secret.
Jean-Clement: A private school?
Abraham: No, Hampstead school, posh school.
Gabriel: It’s boys mixed, with boys.
Alisa: It’s boys mixed with girls.
Abraham: It’s all social, they’re all social climbers.
Jean-Clement: Ah, so they select the people to come to the school.
Abraham: That’s right.
Alisa: And they sell us for 50 Pounds each. So Papa sells me and Gabriel —
Abraham: At the parties. And a hundred people do sex to them. A hundred people do sex to them.
Jean-Clement: [inaudible]
Abraham: No, a hundred people do sex to them, each. So its two hundred, sex, two hundred times sex, two hundred times fifty is how much?
Alisa: Two hundred plus thirty?
Abraham: Ten grand. I’ve done the maths already. Ten thousand Pounds. That’s just, he also sells the videos. What else does he sell, too? A whole – shut up. He makes movies. He makes snuff movies of the babies. And he sells them in the Ukraine, in Russia, in Brazil, in Portugal, in Brussels, in England, he sells them all over the world. Tell Papa about the movies.
Gabriel: There’s a, there’s a, there’s a Mum, I got a, a, a, I got a friend called James in my class. And his mother’s called Galyna, and she’s Ukrainian, and she, um, she translates the movies, and she, she translates it, and she also, um …
Alisa: And it’s like movies of them doing sex to me and Gabriel, to the children in school, it’s like them doing sex and uh, they’re doing sex to each other, and then, and then they sometimes they make movies of them, them dancing.
Jean-Clement: How old are you two?
Gabriel: I’m eight and she’s nine, but I’m taller than she is.
—————————————
12:23
Abraham: He’s supposed to see them. He organized a party for the 31st of August. We didn’t let him get the children because we know what he wants to do to them. When he finds out what they have told me, he will kill them.
Jean-Clement: So he doesn’t know yet?
Abraham: Of course he doesn’t know.
Jean-Clement: So he doesn’t know they’re here?
Abraham: He doesn’t know they’re here yet. He will find out. He will find out because we have to give the passports back to the solicitor, who is a member of the pedophile group.
Jean-Clement: Why can’t they change schools?
Abraham: They can’t change school.
Jean-Clement: They can’t?
Abraham: We were going to do that, but, No.
Jean-Clement: [inaudible]
Abraham: He’s gonna get them, he’s gonna get them if we don’t protect them, he’s gonna get them.
Jean-Clement: But is he got a court order to see them?
Abraham: But were not going to let him see them. We can’t let him see them. They will kill them.
Alisa: They’ll sacra – sacrifice us, the same like the baby. So they’ll eat us, themselves … Abraham: Now you understand my dilemma.
————————————–
15:04
Abraham: So the father, he’s waiting and he has a court –
Jean-Clement: For them to go back to school?
Abraham: No, not only that. He has a visiting, he’s taken the mother to court now again. Jean-Clement: OK.
Abraham: Because he wants to see his children. But why does he want to see them? To do sex to them, to make party, to sell them to other people, and to make movies. We cannot let that happen any more, Jean-Clement. You understand?
Jean-Clement: OK.
Abraham: We cannot allow it to happen any more. Tell him about Papa’s secret room and what he does there. Secret rooms.
Jean-Clement: Can they stay here then?
Abraham: Where?
Jean-Clement: Here.
Abraham: What for? They can, but they will touch each other. And you can’t feed them, you can’t feed them the diet they need. They are vegan, raw vegan. Their mother won’t let them eat anything –
Jean-Clement: Unless they stay with mother then.
Abraham: Where?
Jean-Clement: Here.
Abraham: Stay with their mother here? Yeah. They could stay with us, they could stay with us where they are.
Jean-Clement: OK.
Abraham: We’re all friends.
Jean-Clement: There’s no problem with that.
Abraham: No, there’s problem. Has father got keys to the house?
Alisa: Yes.
Abraham: Is it a lie? Is it a lie?
Alisa: We gave him the keys –
Abraham: We do not have time for lies. Does father have keys to the house?
Alisa: No.
Abraham: What did you give him?
Alisa: Like I showed him the keys, and he copied it, in this key shop, and he got a spare copy of the keys, and I put, put it back to the keys, to our door.
Abraham: So he’s got copies of the keys? We can change the lock, that’s not a problem.
————————————–
21:17
Abraham: Eh, don’t go to sleep. We’re gonna have a sandwich. Come on, come sit at the table. …
Abraham: Wash your hands, don’t make a mess. Come and sit over here together, yeah, please. You’s like a mint tea?
Alisa & Gabriel: Yes, please.
Alisa: Wash your hands, Gabriel. …
Abraham: Sit round at the table properly, son, don’t let me tell you again. Don’t let me tell you again. You sit round properly, thank-you. Thank-you. Need at bit more?
Gabriel: Uh-huh.
Abraham: You need a bit more ‘cause you’re going to have a little chocolate brownie with it and strawberries, is it alright?
Gabriel: Yes.
Abraham: Yeah.
Gabriel: [inaudible]
Abraham: At the table, you be quiet and you speak when you’re spoken to. Understand? Gabriel: Yes, Papa.
Abraham: Come on. Have some respect. Be respectful children, eh.
Alisa: And let’s help the children, let’s help each other.
Abraham: Yeah, let’s help each other and let’s make sure that no more children get killed, eh.
Gabriel: And we might uh –
Alisa: And make sure Papa goes to jail.
—————————-
31:40
Alisa: If we see how your sister looks like.
Abraham: Here she is with my Mum. That’s my sister on the left, and that’s my Mum. Alisa: Your Mum looks really pretty.
Abraham: Aww …
Alisa: Your Mum looks just like our Mum … She’s a kind person.
————————————
43:50
Jean-Clement: So when everyone is gone, then they, they close the whole school?
Alisa: No … I don’t understand.
Abraham: When you’re Mum leaves in the morning –
Alisa: Yes.
Abraham: Are there other parents who know, and teachers who know —
Alisa: Yes. Yes.
Abraham: And children who know. What happens?
Alisa: They make sure the coast is clear. Mum is not there. Mum’s car is not there. Abraham: Why don’t they want your Mum to be there, why?
Alisa: Because they, they won’t touch none.
Abraham: Why?
Alisa: Because if they, if she doesn’t, they want her to know, they want her to be in it, but they know that if she is in it, she’s not like the kind of per – they know that she’s not the kind of person who’ll be in it, but they’re trying to get her in it.
Jean-Clement: OK. And why don’t you tell your Mum?
Alisa: Because is they keep – one is because they force us to, they tell us: If you tell them, if you tell Mum, you die, we’ll kill you, and your whole family.
———————————
1:15:49
Ella: So it was a hearing at the end of 2013. It was like inter, um, intermediate, um, and nothing was decided … because, you know, he wasn’t there for a year-and-a-half, they were, were reluctant to give him any contacts. Nevertheless, nevertheless in November there was anonymous call to NCPCC, child protection, um, agency, saying they give couple, uh, couple basically about me, saying that I’ve been abusive to children, I don’t feed them, I’m mentally unstable, and something else, um, something else. Apparently, I found, I was suspecting as much, a, um, neighbor, upstairs, that we had a bit of a problem, you know she didn’t like trampoline in the garden. I thought she just wanted to create problems.
Abraham: Trampoline … We had a big trampoline, we got a big trampoline in the garden. The neighbor above, she complained about the trampoline, she complained about just about anything should could find to complain.
Ella: But it was a communal garden. Actually, shouldn’t put an private property in the garden. But, you know, she didn’t like it. Apparently, the same lady she’s part of this cult as well. Now looks like they –
Jean-Clement: OK. The lady, she live above you …
Ella: Yeah.
Jean-Clement: … is part of the cult?
Ella: Yeah.
Jean-Clement: But you didn’t know?
Ella: I had no idea, I had no idea.
Jean-Clement: The kids never told you about any abuse that was happening to them?
Ella: Nothing at all.
Abraham: Did the lady upstairs abuse you? She never touched you, did she?
Alisa: No, but Papa is friends with her. She met, they met each other.
Abraham: Papa is friends with her. But she doesn’t have an appetite for children?
Alisa: No.
Abraham: She is just friends, she is just an associate of the cult, she helps them and they help her.
Alisa: She doesn’t, she doesn’t really like children.
Jean-Clement: OK.
Ella: She tries to cover things for him and –
Alisa: Aggressive.
Jean-Clement: Did she ever attended any of the … schools?
Alisa: Does she have children?
Jean-Clement: No. Did she attended any of the meetings?
Ella: The parties.
Jean-Clement: The cult.
Alisa: Yes. She’s friends with Papa. She’s friends with my Dad. But she doesn’t like, she doesn’t like the children, she doesn’t like touching them . Well, she does, she likes like what Papa’s doing to them. Because he’s mean to them, she’s mean to them, but she doesn’t touch them because she doesn’t like, she doesn’t even like to be near children. She’s not … she’s aggressive.
Jean-Clement: But she attended meeting?
Ella: She was at the parties …
Alisa: Yes.
Ella: … you know, these fun sex parties, which she told me …
Alisa: Yes, yes.
Ella: And she did do the, did she participated in the, um, you know, killing babies and drinking blood and all this? Alisa: Yes, yes, yes. But she doesn’t, she doesn’t touch like, she doesn’t like children.
Jean-Clement: She doesn’t get involved, she just watches.
Alisa: Yes.
Jean-Clement: And she doesn’t get involved.
Alisa: Yes. But she does, she does sometimes does drink blood, she does.
Ella: And she eats meat as well?
Alisa: Yes. She usually does.
Jean-Clement: So when she goes there with you, and you know she goes there …
Alisa: Yes?
Jean-Clement: … and you see her …
Alisa: Uh-huh?
Jean-Clement: … in your … in the passage or in the corridor, do you speak to her?
Alisa: No. She doesn’t talk to children.
Jean-Clement: Oh, she doesn’t talk to children.
Alisa: She doesn’t like children. She doesn’t like.
———————————–
1:36:35
Alisa: ‘Cause Mum, whenever she went into, whenever she meditated, me and Gabriel straight away touched each other.
Ella: I mean I was constantly running around. I, uh, single Mum, I was looking, I was looking after them and making food, you know this …
Alisa: And Gaia wasn’t clever, our touching, we hid away from her, in a park we, um, said we would go …
Jean-Clement: Who’s that?
Alisa: Gaia. Gaia, my nanny.
Jean-Clement: Oh, your nanny.
Alisa: Yes. She, um, she, she hardly spotted us touching. ‘Cause when we went to the park, um, um, we go, um “Me je peu rouler?” … that means: Can we go and have a little walk? Uh, myself, and then, um, and also we sometimes run and we like find sticks, and that when we run and she’s at the back of us, um, we touch each other that time. So she hardly ever spot us.
Ella: At some point, I did notice they were doing something. Um, once I caught them in the bathroom.
Alisa: You caught, you caught us touching, remember?
Ella: Once I came in the, like in the second bathroom in the old flat, and, um, I saw this, I didn’t SEE, but I thought when I came in they were doing something. Now what happened then, later, like a couple of days later, I look my phone, in my photographs, and Gabriel was filming Alisa without her underpants. Really short, like maybe under one minute. And so I had a word with them, looks like they became very skillful at hiding it from me. And, you know, like finding their ways to do that. Or like distracting me, saying that, you know, I’m hungry so I’ll prepare food, they go do it. And that was like kind of one of their tricks. And they developed like signs between them. OK, whenever I’m hungry, or I need to go to the toilet, let’s do that, let’s do that.
Abraham: Let’s go and touch each other. Let’s go and oh, they’d go like this, Mum’s talking, she’s talking, they wouldn’t say a word, she’d go like …
Ella: Behind my back.
Abraham: And they’d go and do sex, maybe go and do sex, or touch each other. Or she’d go like this …
Alisa: Mum, remember when you spot us …?
Abraham: Excuse me.
Alisa: Yes.
Abraham: Or she’d go like this … and then that’s another sign. What does that mean? Alisa: That means like, say that means: Mum’s not looking, she’s away, we can touch each other.
Abraham: And what is this one? What this one means? Stick out your bum?
Alisa: That means: Go to the toilet.
Abraham: Stick out the bum twice?
Alisa: And then, twice …
Abraham: And what does this one mean?
Alisa: That one means, that one means: Be careful of Mum. That one means, that one means: Be careful of Mum. The sticking out the bum TWICE means like, like: Go to the toilet and do it. Or just once, that means … put, put, uh, um, because Papa, Papa learned …
Abraham: Don’t tell me what, tell him what once means: Put poo on our food?
Alisa: Yes, because Papa, Papa …
Abraham: Don’t keep … Papa, right.
Alisa: He was learning us.
Abraham & Ella: Teaching us.
Alisa: He was teaching us.
Gabriel: Signs.
Alisa: To put, uh, poo on her food, and her toothbrush.
Abraham: Yeah. They took my toothbrush and they wiped it around the toilet. And I kept getting sick, I kept getting the runs and I couldn’t work out why. And then I worked it out. Then I worked it out. And then when I realized they were doing it, I didn’t make a big scene because we already had enough pressure by finding out this. So what I did I kept cool, and I moved my toothbrush from the sink where I usually kept it and I put it into my bag, to let them know I know what you were doing, I’m not going to make a scene for Mama, do not do it any more. And guess what, they did. They continued to do it to my toothbrush. So I raised it as an issue, and I gave them licks for it. I gave them good licks for it.
Ella: Now the thing is now when I learned about it all, I started to look back and I’ve seen this and now, now I’ve seen what is going on because, for example, when Alisa was like really tiny, maybe like under one years old, still in the pram, one time she was, she was like crying for, I don’t know, non-stop for maybe an hour. Like screaming, screaming, screaming … I mean she was fed, she was changed, she didn’t have anything bad to upset her stomach, she was screaming and screaming and screaming and, um, I think this was maybe the first time he did some sexual thing to her. And, um …
Alisa: And remember that time I was in this little baby bed and I was screaming there for hours, for like maybe one hour, and Marsha was there, Marsha still was with you, and then, uh, trying to calm me down, that’s what I remember.
Ella: So, and then, kind of like now I could, I could see what’s going on, what was going on … I could recognize it.
Abraham: In hindsight, in hindsight, now you know what’s been going on.
Ella: So I could kind of, in my memory, I could think this could mean, must be that, must be that. But, at the time, I had no idea.
Alisa: Mum couldn’t even imagine that, Mum couldn’t even imagine that, of Papa doing sex to us and we were killing babies, she couldn’t even, she couldn’t even think of that.
—————————————————–
1:43:16
Jean-Clement: So you became aware now.
Ella: Yeah.
Jean-Clement: You know about it. So what happened?
Ella: Yeah, so what happened …
Jean-Clement: Did you confront the Dad? Ask him about it?
Ella: No, no.
Jean-Clement: Why not?
Ella: We, uh …
Abraham: We didn’t know, Jean-Clement. She didn’t know then.
Ella: We only discovered four weeks ago, this whole thing.
Abraham: We only discovered this …
Jean-Clement: Why didn’t you spoke today?
Abraham: Jean-Clement, listen to me. We only discovered this …
Ella: Just now, just now …
Abraham: One moment –
Ella: … two weeks ago.
Abraham: I suspected this, listen I had my first suspicions about, almost two months ago, I think maybe a month, almost two months ago, when I first heard his voice on the, on the Skype.
Ella: On Skype, yeah.
Abraham: That was when I had my suspicions. I wasn’t one hundred per cent sure.
Jean-Clement: Oh, from the sound of his voice?
Abraham: Yes!
Ella: Uh-huh.
Abraham: And also because of the clues I’ve had from the children’s behavior, from them touching the Dog.
Gabriel: Yeah, we were touching the Dog’s privates.
Abraham: And certain other clues.
Alisa: Papa also takes Dogs, and he tells us to touch the privates.
Abraham: So, and certain other clues, I began to suspect heavily. And then when we got to Morocco and I realized that they were touching each other on a regular basis, I said to them: You guys are doing this regularly, how come no one’s caught you? Who is touching you? Who? I know someone else is touching you, you’ve learned this from an adult. Who is it, who is it? And then they …
Jean-Clement: That’s when they unfolded.
Abraham: Then they opened this up.
————————————–
1:57:44
Ella: What his address, um, what’s his address?
Alisa: Who, Papa’s? … 15, no, 16 Angel Road. Abraham: 16? You told me it’s 15.
Alisa: No, 16, 16.
Ella: They were changing this.
Abraham: You told me it was 15.
Alisa: No, it’s 16.
Abraham: You told me –
Ella: The reason I’m asking because I’ve got different, even, um …
Jean-Clement: That Angel Road in Hampstead?
Ella: No, this is in Islington.
Abraham: What’s his real address? What is it?
Alisa: 15 Angel Road.
Abraham: You just told them 16. Jean-Clement.
Jean-Clement: Yes?
Abraham: Jean-Clement, this one has to be watched.
Jean-Clement: No, no …
Abraham: No, no, no, don’t tell me anything. His address is 15 Angel Road, and she just told you it was 16 Angel Place, Angel Road, and she just told you it was 16. Pay close attention to this one.
Jean-Clement: Does this one or two building?
Abraham: Jean-Clement … no, no, Jean-Clement, I lived with her, you’re not listening to me.
Jean-Clement: OK Abraham: She lies. Instinctively. She lies.
Jean-Clement: So if you think she lies … why would you believe her story?
Abraham: Because I questioned her ten times, and then I will question him … we question them separately …
Jean-Clement: Oh, right.
Abraham: … like the police do.
Jean-Clement: OK.
Abraham: And anything that corresponds perfectly we, we, OK.
Jean-Clement: OK.
Abraham: The reason we know that the house, it doesn’t matter the number, we know the road and we know that it’s right on the corner, corner house. So if she tell us 15, 16, it doesn’t matter. It doesn’t matter she tell us 15, 16, 17, we know it’s the corner house. Don’t we?
Alisa: Yes.
Abraham: What’s the real address?
Alisa: Angel, Angel Road.
Abraham: What is the number, darling?
Alisa: It’s on the corner.
Abraham: What is the number? Don’t try to evade the question. What’s the number? Alisa: Number 15.
Abraham: Why did you tell us 16 just now? Go and wash your plate, please.
Jean-Clement: That’s probably because the information I was provided is meant to confusicate.
Abraham: What information was provided by who?
Ella: Make confusing, us.
Abraham: No, no, you are being naïve.
Jean-Clement: Where is provided to them …
Abraham: Can you stop being naïve? And can you just listen to us, who have the experience of dealing with them? She purposely, and expertly …
Ella: Was misleading.
Jean-Clement: That’s what she says. That’s what she was trained to do.
Abraham: No. Yes, she was trained.
Jean-Clement: That’s what she said.
Ella: Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Jean-Clement: So you have to understand that.
Abraham: No, we do understand that. But we’re letting you know.
Jean-Clement: It’s not purposely done. It’s done so that the story, when it goes out, nobody follows it. That how it’s made.
Ella: They’re mixing, they’re mixing some truthful facts with some lies. Mixing and mixing, mixing, so it took us four weeks to get to the …
Abraham: She actually attempts to mislead …
Jean-Clement: That’s why …
Abraham: She actually attempts. But because we know that when we are sometimes, this is another one of her, this is what she does … Ella and I, we will begin to discuss certain aspects of the situation …
Jean-Clement: OK.
Abraham: … and by discussing it …
Jean-Clement: Yeah.
Abraham: … we brainstorm, and together we come up, or we work out, we work things out.
Jean-Clement: OK.
Abraham: What she will do when we are talking, she will interrupt us …
Jean-Clement: Yeah.
Abraham: … and distract us with something. And send us, try to, attempt to send us in another complete … we say to her: Be quiet, don’t distract us any more.
Ella: And she would listen to our conversations.
Abraham: Oh, she eavesdrops on your conversations, and he does it as well.
Ella: And she would use the information she heard …
Abraham: And he does it.
Ella: … creating whatever, some kind of confusion between us.
Abraham: What you looking at him for? What you just, what was that look you just did to him? What was that look she just did to you?
Gabriel: It’s a sign to me.
Abraham: What was the sign?
Gabriel: The eye one.
Abraham: What does that mean?
Gabriel: That means I’m ready to …
Abraham: You’re ready to touch? Excuse me!
Jean-Clement: Yeah.
Abraham: Pay close attention. Because you think you know, but you don’t. Once you are talking, and once we are distracted explaining to you, because you don’t, you don’t know them.
Jean-Clement: Hmmm …
Abraham: So once we are distracted. Umm, how can I say? Um, once we are distracted explaining to you the situation, the enormousness of the situation, and how expertly they are able to distract, once we are doing this, she knows and she made an eye sign to him that “I am ready to touch.” Because they regularly touch, because the father questions them as to whether or not they have touched each other.
Ella: And if they haven’t, he would hurt them.
Abraham: Punish them.
Alisa: And sometime he accuses us.
Abraham: He accuses you of not doing it, even when you touch.
Gabriel: We touch it. And then he says: No, you haven’t, stop lying.
Ella: How many times? They supposed to do it five times at least. Yeah, five times a day? Alisa: Every day. Every single day.
Abraham: Ahh … now you’re getting some idea of the case, Jean-Clement. Alright, what we’re up against.
Ella: And even they’re saying he did, he will still hurt, hurt them.
Alisa: Anyway, he’ll hurt us anyway. Anyway.
Abraham: Because he takes, he takes sadistic pleasure in hurting you.
Ella: Also he would scream into the, Gabriel …
Abraham: He screams into his ear, he’s deaf in one ear. He screams into their ear. When are there – excuse me – when he is holding them to kill the baby with a knife, he’s screaming into their ear. What happens, who screams into your ear?
Gabriel: Alisa and Papa. Kill! Kill! Kill! Kill! Abraham: And what about the rest of the people, what do they say?
Gabriel: Kill! They say, they say …
Abraham: Tell me how they say it.
Alisa & Gabriel: They say: Kill! Kill! Kill! Kill! Like cheers.
Abraham: Say it. Say it how they say it.
Alisa & Gabriel: Kill! Kill! Kill! Kill! Kill!
Alisa: Like that. But then after, when it’s my turn to kill the baby, the others and Gabriel say Kill.
Abraham: And when it’s his turn to say it, you say it.
Alisa: Yes.
Abraham: What’s the word that you say?
Alisa: Kill.
Abraham: Say it more for me, I want to hear it.
Alisa: Kill, kill, kill, kill. Abraham: I like the sound of it. Can you say it together? Say it together? Let’s all say it together.
Abraham & Alisa & Gabriel: Kill! Kill! Kill! Kill!
Abraham: That’s what they say.
Gabriel: Then really loudly, in my ear.
Abraham: You getting the picture now? You’re getting the picture.
Gabriel: And they also, um, sometimes they say: Kill the baby! Kill the baby! Ella: It’s incredible.
Abraham: What do they say?
Gabriel: Kill the baby! Kill the baby! Kill the baby! Kill the baby!
Abraham: Let’s say it together, let’s say it together.
Abraham & Alisa & Gabriel: Kill the baby! Kill the baby! Kill the baby! Kill the baby! Abraham: Thank-you.
Gabriel: Like that.
Ella: He was doing to Alisa’s ears, while she’s not hearing very well in the other ear. Gabriel: I’m deaf in this one, completely deaf.
Ella: The thing is …
Alisa: Sometimes we do not listen to Mum. But usually is the, the reason is, because we can’t, we don’t listen to them is because we can’t hear them. That’s usually the point. But usually we sometimes do not listen to them.
Abraham: I love that honesty, I love that honesty, beautiful honesty that is.
Ella: On Wednesdays they had a special day in school …
Abraham: First time you tell them you killed baby …
Ella: … for example … up to sixty people could be abusing them in one day.
Abraham: Each.
Ella: They were putting broomsticks in their bottoms …
Abraham: Mama, mama, mama, let’s get the children to bed, please. It’s quarter past one. Please, can we get the children to bed? We are all so tired. I am tired.
Jean-Clement: Can I [inaudible] come to you, so that they will have time to sleep in? Abraham: Yes. You should come to us.
Jean-Clement: Is that better?
Abraham: Yes, yes, you should come to us. Yes, please, Jean-Clement. “S’il vous plait. S’il vous plait.” Can we go now?
Gabriel: And, um, they, um …
Abraham: Can we go now, please? Thank-you. I’ve been patiently asking since quarter-to-one. Thank-you.
Jean-Clement: Want me to copy this one? I, uh, keep all you got, make copies.
Ella: I’ll, I’ll …
Abraham: Can we do this tomorrow? Can we finish? Can we terminate now? Can we go now, please? I’m tired. Thank-you. Thank-you. Some of us have been working on this for a month, full-time, some of us haven’t slept for a month. Let’s go.
Ella: Thank-you very much. Nice, nice to meet you. Thank-you very much for your time. Abraham: I told you he’d, I told you he’d be perfect, perfect man for the job. Patient, patient. He’s kind, he’s thorough.
End of recording
HAMPSTEAD COVER UP : JUDGE ANNA PAUFFLEY THE FRAUD
“Judge” Anna Pauffley listened to the “very lengthy audio recording” made by Special constable Jean Clement Yaohirou. This recording was the very first disclosure to the police reporting the rapes and murders at Hampstead Christ Church primary school and church, 5.9.14. ANYONE listening to this recording immediately realises the seriousness of the allegations, and that this is NOT a custody dispute, OR a matter for a “Family Court”: it is the report of rape, torture and murder of children. Starting at around 1hr 25mins on the recording, the children begin to describe a black wart, “about the size of a five pence piece” on the vaginal “lips” of school nurse, Ms Marden. They go on to describe a “devil” tattoo Marden has on her pudendum, where her wart looks as if it is on the “devil’s cheek”. Both alisa and gabriel state clearly that all the teachers have these genital tattoos, as do the parents and children taking part in the “fun, sex parties”. This “TATTOO” testimony is highly-incriminating IDENTIFYING evidence, yet Pauffley in her so-called “judgement” (19-3-15) does NOT mention one word about these tattoos, or any of the genital markings such as piercings, birthmarks or warts the children had described on their NAMED attackers. “Judge” Pauffley KNEW the police had concealed this damning recording the same day they received it, and that it never formed part of their so-called investigation. Pauffley KNEW the concealment of this evidence by the police was a criminal act: FRAUD. “Judge” Anna Pauffley also KNEW, by being aware of this FACT, yet continuing with her Family Court “fact-finding hearing” – instead of halting it the moment she realised there had been no investigation of the tattoos/genital marks – that she too was committing FRAUD. This recording and its FRAUDULENT concealment of its important and highly-incriminating identifying testimony/evidence, proves that DI John Cannon 189067, DS Matthew Fernandez 205219, DC Steve Martin 219414, DC Alan Rogers 207875, DC Carl Savage (warrant number NOT recorded in police CRIS report) along with “Judge” Anna Pauffley and “Judge” Nigel Ryder, have ALL participated in FRAUD in order to cover-up the Hampstead Christ Church Child Rapes and Murders. THERE WAS NO INVESTIGATION, ONLY A COVER-UP FROM THE VERY FIRST DAY.
“They now revealed that it was their father who was teaching them to do this. Moreover, he was forcing them to steal for him. The large amounts of money were missing both from Mr Christie’s wallet and my purse.In May-June 2014 the large amounts were taken from my credit card. Alisa says that her dad asked her to write the card details for him. This incident was reported to the bank. Mr Dearman forced Alisa to steal Mr Christie’s iPhone (along with the other few possessions), which according to the children, was then used by Mr Dearman to film the sexual abuse scenes.I was constantly seeking the answers to the situation, asked the school….” Did you forget about this piece of evidence Mr.Dearman ? How is your ploy to fit Abe’s phone up with CHILD PORN working out Mr. Dearman ?. YOU advertise your own daughter for sale/sex on your CHILD PORN sites.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=woZ3ijfU8fUYOU mention the word PORN at least 7 times in your police interview where you are being questioned regarding sodomising the children. YOU tell Ella that you believe you’ve seen her on a PORN site during a Skype conversation with the children present. YOU pester Ella with PORNOGRAPHIC texts messages, which she eventually reports to the “Police.” YOU produce CHILD PORN snuff movies, the children testified. YOU attempt to fit Abraham up with CHILD PORN on his phone that you told the children to steal for you. Can you see a pattern Mr Dearman ? Would you like some assistance ? YOU and CHILD PORN is the repetitive pattern. Your straw man attacks on Abraham have failed, (but don’t let that stop you) because YOU have attracted more attention to YOUR links to CHILD PORN and snuff movies, David (Porky) Cameron’s Big Society money laundering, FRAUD and your off shore banking services, 1000’s of innocent children’s deaths each year, organ trafficking… Keep grabbing all you can, you’ll be able to take it ALL to Hell with you. Ask not for whom the Bell tolls…. “ Abraham
“The statement in Dr. Hodes medical report is: “Physical findings today further confirm the allegations of inflicted anal injury from insertion of a blunt penetrative force and are consistent with the allegations of sexual abuse.” That is quite clear and unequivocal and in conjunction with the children’s detailed disclosure and symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder, this should have been enough evidence to prompt an immediate criminal investigation. www.hampsteadcoverup.com Dearman et al repeatedly attempt to obfuscate and deny the unequivocal nature of Dr. Hodes’ findings. Why ?“
Ricky Dearman- Have you considered that your perception of what the audio reveals is tainted by your desire to “blackjacket” me because you hold me responsible for exposing you ? The children REALLY exposed you, hemp was the catalyst. This audio was concealed by D.C. Rogers and D.I. Cannon because any decent human being can hear the children speaking freely of their experiences with you and your degenerate associates, corroborating the private videos, police ABE interviews and testimonies in the extensive file handed to Barnet Police by Ella on September 5th 2014. This audio has the ring of TRUTH. Something that an inveterate liar may have difficulty hearing. As a generational Satanist ( listen to the children explain in this audio) you were introduced by Christ Church School teacher Claire Wilmer to other teachers/Satanists involved in State sponsored Trauma Based Mind Control (TBMC) programs which have infested numerous schools, nurseries, hospitals, and private dwellings in & around Hampstead and throughout U.K. All with the full participation of Head Teacher, Kate ( Port Wine Stain Birth Marked pudendum with TATTOO and gold Piece rings, on extended paid leave at the taxpayers expense.) Forsdyke, and school nurse Nina ( large black mole the size of a five pence piece on the cheek of her pudendum Baphomet/Devil TATTOO) Marden, AND not forgetting your BFF Best Friend Forever, Louis(a) ( Spotted Dick) Hollings. How is Father Paul. the Christ Church priest, with his pudenda TATTOO and piercings down his back? Still in hiding in Spain. Do you suppose Camden Education Board knows anything about it !!?? Say hi to Sophie ( Devil TATTOOED pudenda, Adrenal Fatigue) Dix at the BBC. Perhaps she can wrangle another interview for you. Your narcissistic psychopathic ego caused you to believe that you could TBMC the children without their mother ( of course you ordered the children to “make it difficult” for Ella, even encouraging them to commit matricide) or anyone else suspecting. Such arrogance… but then if you’re off shore banking the proceeds of money laundering scams involving Galyna and Mark( TATTOOED pudendum and genitalia) Upson, Prime Minister David (Porky) Cameron and others, whilst also supplying child/snuff porn, cocaine and organising “Fun Sex Parties” for Thelamites, Satanists, sodomites and sadists you could be forgiven for considering yourself invincible. Cocaine can have that effect. How long did you think you could get away with it !? STATE SPONSORED TRAUMA BASED MIND CONTROL STOPS HERE ! FREE THE HAMPSTEAD 2 !“ Abraham
drifloudcommentA
whatareyouafraidof
fearisthemindkiller

Getting To The Root Of The Hampstead Situation

There is one single person responsible for this entire Hampstead situation, drum roll please….

 

 

willdraper1

Link to photo

Will Draper.

Ella Draper’s first husband.  He is responsible for sending Ricky Dearman to Ella.  From the “Jean-Clement recording”,…

All three children are involved in the cult now. From two different men, who are cult members. She came to me, because she knew I didn’t, I wasn’t a weird guy. She knew there was something, I was clean. And she knew, in her heart, that I could help her. She didn’t know how. I didn’t know how. … Her first husband, he sent the second man to her. “

Why doesn’t anyone talk about this?

Mr. Draper & his wife “Sara” were in the same cult as Ricky Dearman.  Will Draper is supposedly the cult financier, which would make sense since he works in the banking industry.

“Originally from the city of Rostov in southern Russia, Ella Draper – or Ella Gareeva as she then was – attended Moscow State University, where she graduated with a masters degree in history of art.

“It was in Moscow in the Nineties that she met a British banker who would become her first husband (Will Draper).

“She became pregnant and moved to Britain around 17 years ago to raise their son; he still lives with his father (Will Draper) in the Home Counties.
“The marriage eventually ended, but she kept her married name and went on to have two children with the actor Ricky Dearman.”
So let’s see if we’ve got this straight…Will Draper met Ella in Moscow while she was getting her masters in art history, got her pregnant and they moved to the UK.  Away from her family, in a foreign land, she gave birth to their son James.  Got it.
Things didn’t work out so Mr.& Mrs. Draper divorced and Ella was left to raise their son.
Mr. Draper then sends his cult buddy Ricky Dearman to Ella to produce more children, thus child A & child G.  Knowing full well that Ricky Dearman was in his cult, Will Draper must have known how abusive and sadistic Ricky Dearman was.
James, Ella’s first son with Will Draper, was a witness firsthand to Ricky Dearman’s abusive ways.
From Ella’s testimony:

“The Past of an Abuser as Father”

“Mr Dearman has never provided financially for the children, except £10 per child per month taken off his benefits during the last 3-4 years. He hardly ever spent any quality time with them at home. He would never read a book or play games with them. The only game he seemed to play was the “tickling game”. I wasn’t happy about this since it always led to some kind of abuse. For example, Mr Dearman wouldn’t stop tickling children even though they would scream for him to stop. Besides, he would normally start this odd game late in the evening when the children would already have taken a bath and be ready for bed. This would send them hyper and those situations would almost always end up in arguments since I wanted to protect the children.

Furthermore, all of a sudden James started to dislike Mr Dearman. Mr Dearman responded with humiliating remarks and attempted to discipline James in strange ways. For example, he would lock him up, while I was at work or shopping, and he would give him a bucket to pee and poo. This would almost always also result in arguments.

He also harassed me sexually, pressuring me to have anal sex with him. He then bought a gigantic artificial penis suggesting for me to use. On many occasions he attempted to get me to watch online pornography.

I objected to his perverted sexual attempts, threw the sex toy in the bin and asked Mr Dearman to pick his stuff he had in my house and not to come there again. (2007) However, he came to school to “surprise” the children and often stalked us, showing up from nowhere: in the park, or on the way to school and in shops.

I warned him on many occasions to stop doing this. But he requested to see the children. Many times he came and knocked on my door without prior notice and several times he broke in through the garden door. On one of such occasions he was violent and humiliated my mother by screaming and hitting her. He ran away before I dialed the police.

Since stalking continued, I applied for an Emergency Court Order, and a Non-Molestation Order was granted for a month initially and then extended for 8 months while proceedings for contact were going on.

I sent Alisa to Russia to stay with my parents. Unfortunately her passport ran out and she ended up staying slightly longer than anticipated.

A week after my application, his solicitors applied for a Prohibited Steps Order since he claimed that I was trying to take the children out of the country. This was dismissed and there is currently no such Order in place.

Mr Dearman also made an application for contact. This was eventually granted in spite of my concerns for the children’s safety. He started to see them regularly: every Saturday from 10am to 6pm.

However, contacts were not going well at all. Mr Dearman was consistently returning the children late. He rejected my advice regarding their diet and was returning packed lunches of home prepared food.

Alisa and Gabriel were frequently getting sick during contact. Many times they vomited while in his care or after they came back home. Sometimes they developed headaches and stomach aches. I blamed this on food that Mr Dearman was feeding them with.

My solicitors and I have sent numerous reminders, requesting not to feed the children with processed, sugary snacks. On one occasion Alisa developed high fever and hardly moved. I contacted the emergency doctor’s line and almost took her to the emergency room.

Not only were the children returning sick or becoming sick shortly after, each time they were coming back in a terrible emotional and psychological state. A lot of Mondays or first part of the school week were missed as a result and affected the children’s education.”

Knowing all of this was going on, Will Draper never spoke up?  He never wanted to protect his ex-wife?  The ex-wife he brought to London from Russia?   Will Draper knows what Child “A” & Child “G” have gone through yet he ‘allows’ the cover-up to continue while he lives his life with his perfect little family, nice cushy financier life-style sending young James off to university and allowing Ella to be run out of the country when 9 police officers show up without a warrant at her flat, equipped with a medical kit (yes, a medical kit.  “For what?” you ask?  To drug Ella and kidnap her, to shut her up of course).

What kind of a man DOES that???

Will Draper is often times quoted in the Financial Times and other news outlets, so it’s ‘business as usual’ for him apparently.

I wonder what it feels like to see your ex-wife splashed all over the front pages of Britain’s newspapers with headlines like these, knowing full-well the cover-up going on:

“Police hunting runaway mother who tortured her two children into inventing fantasy claims about a satanic sex cult run by their father”

“Evil’ ex-wife who forced children to claim father was leader of satanic paedophile cult is hunted by police”

“Mystery of mum who tortured her young kids into inventing claims they were abused by satanic cult”

And you people act as if things like this don’t go on, “There’s no cult!” you say…lol…okay!

“Colin Batley, leader of sex cult preying on children, could spend life in jail”

The Satanists of Ash Tree Close: ‘Evil’ paedophile found guilty of running sex cult from cul-de-sac in seaside village”

Cult UK  Britain has 1,000 sects… and many are based in ordinary homes”

VIP paedophile networks ‘shut down police investigations which got too close’, retired officers claim”

“Jimmy Savile was part of satanic ring

But yeah, it doesn’t exist…nothing to see here, move along…

“SATANIC RITUAL ABUSE U.K. – Convictions so far” by Nathaniel J Harris

There WILL BE justice, Will Draper & Ricky Dearman.  It may take 10 years to come, but it will come.  Will Draper, you need to find a way to correct this situation, seriously!

 

ukpedos