Dearman IS “Spiny Norman” Proven FACT!

When the Hampstead children’s disclosure videos first went viral on the internet, many turned to Youtube to listen to their young voices speaking about horrific abuse, depravities of man that children should never know about, horrified we listened.   A few short days later, February 20, 2015, the very first video claiming “It’s a Hoax” came out.  Uploaded by the Youtube account called “Sound Affects” at the time, but has changed it’s name many times since.  The channel is now, most recently been called “Spiny Norman”.  We know it’s the same channel that was created Oct. 30, 2014, after disclosure, yet before the videos went  viral in Feb. 2015, because the URL of the channel hasn’t changed.  It is still “PleiadianReborn

pleiadianrebornytbanner

When the first “Hoaxtead: The Hampstead Hoax Exposed” video came out, the channel was called “Sound Affects”

 

SoundaffectsisHoaxtead

Now let’s see, who IS “Sound Affects?”

Screen shot #1

mychildren

Screen shot #2

mychildren3

Screen shot #3

mychildren2

 

Let me explain the importance of these Youtube comments and the video they appear on.  These comments were made by “Dexter S” and “Sound Affects” on the “Hoaxtead: The Hampstead Hoax Exposed” video made by “Sound Affects”,  the very first channel to make a video calling the Hampstead cover up a “HOAX”.

pleyadianrebornvideolist

Link: https://www.youtube.com/user/PleiadianReborn/videos  (Expand video section)

hoaxteadfirstvideo

The relevance of the comments about “illegal videos of MY children to the internet” on the first video titled “Hoaxtead: The Hampstead Hoax Exposed”, so soon after the children’s disclosure videos went viral, is that most parents don’t have “illegal” videos of their children.  In fact, at the time of the making of this video, it was NOT illegal to post their disclosures, Mrs. Justice Anna Pauffley’s Approved Judgment of March 19, 2015, in a London, U.K., Family Court did that.  None the less, “Sound Affects”, the channel owner, called the Hampstead children “MY children”.  And here in this video, he calls his children liars…

soundaffectsspinynormancallshischildrenliars

 

“Sound Affects” has since been changed to it’s recent name “Spiny Norman”, yet the URL still says “/PleiadianReborn/about” (link archived here)

spinynormanaboutyt

 

Here, in comments “Spiny Norman” says this video is the first use of the term “Hoaxtead” and this was the first “Anti-Hoax about the Hampstead case” video, where the comment, “posting illegal videos of MY CHILDREN to the internet” appeared.

 

spinynormanyoutubecommenthoaxtead

 

While commenting on a recent video, I asked Spiny Norman about the “posting illegal videos of MY CHILDREN to the internet” comment directly…here’s how that went…

SpinyNormanOuted2

SpinyNormanOuted3

SpinyNormanOuted4

 

So the ILLEGAL videos “Spiny Norman” was speaking of, WERE in FACT videos of A & G and he called them “my children”  Proven fact, Spiny Norman IS DEARMAN.

Here’s the archived link to those comments

kaboom

THEN on top of alllll of that, “Spiny Norman” PULLS alllll of his comments from the thread!  Bingo!

SpinyNormanPulledComments

Full admission….and this completely changes the conversation…if not MUCH more!

The link to the video where these comments were found is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TGC9hkFkJ80&lc=z13svpvonwjcvztqq04cjx3qalekzjbz2ik.1496686769033883

And again, archived at http://archive.is/3VlH0

This was Dearman’s response on Hoaxtead Research

SpinyNormanOnHoaxAboutBeingOuted

Spiny speaks about his “hypothetical” children, what a LIAR!  Why did you pull your comments Dearman???? 

 

Recently, on Hoaxtead Research celebrating their publications two year anniversary, El Coyote writes, “Scarlet, who coined the word “Hoaxtead”, led off with a jaw-dropping 1,000+ posts in our first four months….”

ScarletScoopHoaxtead

So did “Scarlet Scoop” coin the phrase on 2 May, 2015?  or did “Sound Affects”/”Spiny Norman” coin the phrase on 20 Feb., 2015?  A mere difference of 2.5 months or was it the same person coining the phrase.  Is “Scarlet Scoop” also “Spiny Norman”?  Interesting points to question….

aaproductionsspinynorman

 

The “Spiny Norman” video says it  was produced by “AA Productions”, their channel logo:

shapeshifters2

And on Feb. 20th,  “Sound Affects” declares the case “DISMISSED” but it was NOT.

casedismissed

In fact, almost all of “Spiny Norman’s videos say “Case Closed”

spinynormancaseclosed

And “Game Over”

spinynormangameover

Some new screen shots from “Google Hoaxtead” on Youtube, shows that ‘Google Hoaxtead” is “Spiny Norman” and “Liza Radley”.  There is also a comment that Maggs Shaw O’Neill joined the Hoaxtead ‘team’….interesting.

GoogleHoaxteadFullPageDiscussion

We especially liked these comments from the above screen capture:

GoogleHoaxteadSpinyNorman

MaggsShawO'Neill1

LizaRadleyGoogleHoaxtead1

Maggs Shaw O’Neill…..from the Hollie Greig Cover Up….Friends with ‘alleged’ Hollie abuser Sylvia Anne Major….is involved with “Hoaxtead Research”  BOOM!

 

The blog created to defend the alleged abusers, “Hoaxtead Research” on WordPress was created.  “Fact-finding to refute the ‘scurrilous’ allegations, support the Hampstead community and expose the hoaxers” (“hoaxers”, people like me who believe the children’s testimonies, police interviews and that the retractions were grossly coerced)  It is a place where the devil dwells…

hoaxteadbanner

And we here at #BelieveTheChildren have been on the case since February 2015, taking screen shots of our opposition and keeping up with all that happens for two years as well

HappyAnniversary2years

 

 Here is an excellent video by “SuperEarther” featuring some of our screen shots!

 “Spiny Norman” IS Mr. Dearman, if he publishes anything, it is in CONTEMPT OF COURT and PREJUDICIAL to a FAIR TRIAL!  Screen capture all comments and posts made by “Spiny Norman” when you see them, archive.is the link.

Disclaimer

IMPORTANT NOTICE

THIS POST IS INTENDED TO WARN THE COMMUNITY ABOUT A SERIOUS PROBLEM IN THE HOPE OF PREVENTING AND EXPOSING CRIMES AGAINST CHILDREN. IT IS IN NO WAY INTENDED TO HARASS ANY INDIVIDUALS NAMED OR OTHERWISE OR TO ENCOURAGE OTHERS TO DO SO.

PLEASE TREAT THIS INFORMATION RESPONSIBLY * DO NOT ATTEMPT TO CONTACT ANYONE MENTIONED IN THIS POST 

 

Advertisements

3 comments

  1. Abraham Christie · June 7

    Brilliant sleuthing K.C.. Spineless Dearman really has done more than anyone, apart from Alisa and Gabriel, to prove the veracity of the children’s original testimonies.Truth is proof to protect the youth from the uncouth.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. truth1 · June 8

    This was solid research thoroughly proved. I doubt the UK will investigate. Some things never change. What a shame you did not do more for Audi commercial. Did you know Gabriel plays 4 different characters in that video. I say different characters as there are 4 different costumes involving helmets. Gabriel and Alisa are the two racers shown at the very end. Just coincidence, I am sure. This excellent research shows you should have questioned the claim of the ad agency that said it was Jessie. Look at it this way:

    Lets say Alisa was in it. If she was and people started to believe it, what do you think the ad agency would have said?
    Come on , Kris, you can do this. You know quite well that they would have denied it, anyway. So why did you not further investigate and see if it could be proven that Jessie was in that video or not?

    And now Gabriel being in it for most of it, in 4 different parts, completely refuted the entirely of the lies launch by some, probably most of them Satan worshippers. I seriously doubt that the Giacomazzi’s would allow their daughter’s name to be used if the ad agency and “others” had not asked the to use it and they agreed to let them use it. In fact, dare say that Satan might have had a hand in it, too. I can only hope that the UK faces more hell for your well proven discovery and that RD faces special trouble as a result, just like Sabine and Ella. Hey, Ella might get a new neighbor before long, escaping the law. How bout that! 😛
    And when my vastly expanded article hits. there is really going to be trouble. The evidence is overwhelming.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s